Gregg Hull, currently serving his third term as mayor of Rio Rancho, is reportedly weighing the possibility of entering the race for the Republican nomination for governor of New Mexico.
While Hull has not confirmed whether he plans to seek reelection as mayor in 2026, speculation is growing about his potential gubernatorial ambitions.
In an interview with the Sandoval Signpost, Hull acknowledged being approached about a run for the governor’s office.
“I’ve been approached by a lot of individuals to look at the possibility, and I’m currently weighing all of my options,” he shared.
Hull first entered the political arena in 2014 when he was elected mayor of Rio Rancho, the state’s second-largest city, after a long career in the private sector.
Sources within the Republican Party, speaking anonymously to the outlet, indicated that Hull is actively gauging support among party members for a campaign to succeed Democrat Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, who is term-limited and cannot seek reelection in 2026.
New Mexico Republicans face an uphill battle in statewide elections, having last won a statewide race in 2016 when Judith Nakamura secured reelection to the state Supreme Court.
However, the GOP has previously seen success at the governor’s mansion, with Susana Martinez winning two terms before Lujan Grisham’s tenure.
On the Democrat side, Joe Biden’s lame-duck Interior Secretary Deb Haaland and U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich are rumored to be considering campaigns for the governorship, with Haaland’s campaign set to start shortly following her ouster from the Interior Department.
In WalletHub’s 2025 report ranking the best states to raise a family, New Mexico landed in last place out of 50 states, with an overall score of 32.40.
The report, which analyzed 50 key indicators of family-friendliness, painted a concerning picture for families in the Land of Enchantment.
The report evaluated states across five dimensions: Family Fun, Health & Safety, Education & Child Care, Affordability, and Socio-economics. New Mexico scored poorly across the board, particularly in education and child care, where it ranked dead last at 50th.
This dimension considered metrics like public school quality, graduation rates, and child-care availability—areas where New Mexico continues to struggle despite the so-called “free” (taxpayer-funded) daycare passed by the Democrat-dominated Legislature, which currently has a $9 billion “trust fund.”
According to WalletHub, the state also ranks 47th in both Health & Safety and Socio-economics. Factors such as high crime rates, low median family income (adjusted for cost of living), and a significant percentage of families living in poverty contributed to these low scores. For context, the median family income in New Mexico is among the lowest in the nation, and families face substantial economic challenges.
Chip Lupo, a WalletHub analyst, explained the broader challenges families face nationwide. “Raising a family has become significantly more expensive in recent years as the cost of living has risen quickly. In fact, it can cost a family well over $300,000 to raise a child to age 18, according to statistics from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. In light of the expensive nature of being a parent and the responsibility it entails, it’s important to live in a city that is affordable while still providing quality health care, education, safety, and opportunities for enrichment,” Lupo said.
New Mexico also struggles with affordability, ranking 44th, and is noted for being a state where many families find it difficult to save for college or manage medical bills. Moreover, the state ranks 39th in Family Fun, reflecting limited recreational opportunities for children and families compared to higher-ranking states.
While New Mexico offers cultural richness and natural beauty, this report underscores the need for significant investment in public education, economic development, and public safety.
Eliseo “Lee” Alcon, a longtime legislator who had been battling liver cancer, resigned from his position in the New Mexico House of Representatives late last year after entering hospice care.
According to House Democrats, he was surrounded by his family at the time of his passing.
Alcon, a Democrat from Milan, was first elected to the New Mexico House of Representatives in 2009.
Over 16 years, he became a powerful advocate for veterans. He served as the chair of the Consumer and Public Affairs Committee and the Labor, Veterans, and Military Affairs Committee.
A military veteran himself, Alcon served as a combat medic in the U.S. Army during the Vietnam War, earning a Bronze Star for his valor and commitment on the battlefield.
In a heartfelt statement, House Democrats expressed their grief over Alcon’s death. “We are tremendously saddened by the loss of our esteemed colleague and dear friend Eliseo. During his 16 years in the House, Rep. Alcon was a tireless champion for his western New Mexico community and our service men and women. We deeply appreciated the warmth, kindness, good humor, and dedication he brought to the Roundhouse.”
The statement continued to highlight his achievements, adding, “Rep. Alcon’s legacy will live on through the historic victories he achieved for veterans and their families, New Mexico workers, and our environment. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family, especially his beloved wife Darlene and their children, grandchildren, and great-grandson.”
Piñon Post publisher and state Rep. John Block (R-Alamogordo) joins the Rio Grande Foundation’s Paul Gessing for an episode of “Tipping Point New Mexico” to discuss what to expect during this upcoming 2025 Legislative Session and what is expected to come up the pipeline.
Block has overseen the Piñon Post since its inception as “John For New Mexico” in 2016 and its official launch as the Post in 2020 — marking five years of constant reporting in the state.
As New Mexico’s legislative session nears, Democrat lawmakers are championing a slate of policies under the guise of public safety and behavioral health. However, these proposals threaten to harm the very communities they claim to help, deepen government dependency, and distract from pressing issues like the long-standing crisis within the Children, Youth, and Families Department (CYFD).
Alcohol Tax Hikes: A Step Toward Modern-Day Prohibition
Democratic lawmakers are once again pushing for higher taxes on alcohol despite evidence that such policies disproportionately harm the state’s poorest residents. The latest “hybrid” proposal seeks to combine increased wholesale taxes with a new 12% retail tax, which would drive up prices across the board, particularly for consumers in low-income brackets. Proponents, such as House Speaker Javier Martínez, D-Albuquerque, argue the move will reduce alcohol-related deaths, yet similar measures have historically failed to achieve meaningful results.
Raising alcohol prices effectively punishes responsible consumers and mirrors the prohibition-era mindset of legislating personal behavior. Instead of addressing root causes like addiction treatment and education, Democrats are targeting taxpayers to fund their schemes, diverting attention from solutions that could empower individuals rather than penalize them. This approach not only burdens working families but also risks fueling an underground market for alcohol, exacerbating the very public health crises lawmakers claim to solve.
Woke Behavioral Health Plans Masquerading as Public Safety
House Democrats have also unveiled plans to pour hundreds of millions of dollars into so-called behavioral health initiatives, framing them as public safety measures. These initiatives include providing state-funded housing, food, and other unmentionables for individuals battling addiction under the guise of “managed alcohol programs.” Such policies, popularized in Canada, enable addiction rather than confront it, creating a cycle of dependency where the government perpetuates, rather than alleviates, suffering.
Instead of enforcing accountability and implementing meaningful reforms to tackle crime and addiction, Democrats seem intent on expanding the welfare state. Public safety measures should focus on holding offenders accountable, protecting communities, and addressing the root causes of crime—not subsidizing destructive behaviors at taxpayers’ expense.
Democrat Inaction on CYFD: A History of Stalled Reform
While pushing these controversial policies, Democrats have failed year after year to address the critical failings of CYFD. This embattled department, responsible for safeguarding New Mexico’s most vulnerable children, has been plagued by allegations of mismanagement and systemic dysfunction. Efforts to establish an independent Office of the Child Advocate to oversee CYFD have repeatedly been blocked by Democratic lawmakers, who appear more concerned with protecting the status quo than ensuring transparency and accountability.
House Speaker Javier Martínez’s admission that CYFD is “broken” rings hollow when Democrats continue to stymie reform efforts. Their opposition to creating an independent ombudsman’s office, which would provide critical oversight, underscores a lack of political will to prioritize children’s safety. Instead of fixing CYFD, lawmakers are content to throw more money at the department without addressing its structural issues.
Misplaced Priorities and Empty Promises
Democratic lawmakers tout their agenda as a path to progress, but their policies reveal a disconnect from the real needs of New Mexicans. From punitive alcohol taxes to misguided behavioral health programs and a glaring failure to address CYFD, Democrats are doubling down on big-government solutions that hurt the most vulnerable and leave systemic problems unaddressed. It’s time for leadership that prioritizes practical, effective solutions over ideological posturing and political expediency.
New Mexico state Rep. Jared Hembree (R-Chaves) has officially announced his resignation from the New Mexico House of Representatives, citing unforeseen health-related issues that require his immediate attention. The announcement marks the end of his tenure as a representative, a role he described as an honor and privilege.
“It is with a heavy heart that I step down from the State Legislature,” said Representative Hembree in his resignation statement. “Serving the people of my district has been a profound honor. My family and I believe in Chaves County, and we must prioritize my health to ensure we can serve in good faith in the future.”
Rep. Hembree official portrait.
This statement underscores the weight of his decision, as Hembree emphasized his commitment to his constituents and his deep-rooted belief in the Chaves County community. He and his family extended their gratitude to the residents of his district and people across the state for their steadfast support.
In his departure, Hembree has pledged to ensure a smooth transition for his successor, working closely with House Republican leadership to maintain uninterrupted representation for the district. This effort highlights his dedication to his role and the well-being of the community he has served.
House Republican Leader Gail Armstrong released a statement following Hembree’s announcement, expressing the caucus’s collective sorrow and support during this challenging time.
“The thoughts and prayers of the House Republican Caucus are with Representative Hembree and his family during this difficult time,” said Armstrong. “We will forever be grateful for his heart for service and tireless dedication to improving the lives of New Mexicans. Representative Hembree has been a mentor, friend, and inspiration to many of us, and he will be greatly missed in the Roundhouse.”
Hembree’s resignation creates a vacancy in the state legislature, which will necessitate the appointment of a replacement to represent the district. Local officials and the House Republican leadership are expected to work collaboratively to ensure the district continues to receive effective representation.
While Hembree’s departure is a loss for the New Mexico State House, his focus on health and family resonates as a reminder of the personal sacrifices that public service often entails.
Actor Alec Baldwin has filed a lawsuit against New Mexico prosecutors and the Santa Fe Sheriff’s Office, alleging “malicious” prosecution in the wake of the tragic 2021 shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the film Rust. This comes after Baldwin’s manslaughter case was dismissed during his July trial, with the actor’s legal team accusing officials of withholding critical evidence and pursuing the case for “political” and “personal” reasons.
The shooting shocked Hollywood and reignited debates over firearm safety on movie sets. Baldwin, who was both the actor holding the weapon and a producer on the film, faced intense scrutiny for his role in the incident. Despite this, he managed to evade criminal charges, sparking criticism that justice has not been served for Hutchins and her family.
In the lawsuit filed in Santa Fe, Baldwin’s attorneys claim that the special prosecutor and sheriff’s office conspired to bring him to trial for “political” gain. They point to a comment made by former special prosecutor Andrea Reeb, who allegedly suggested the case could bolster her political career. The complaint further alleges that prosecutor Kari Morrissey presented “false and incomplete” testimony to secure Baldwin’s grand jury indictment.
While Baldwin’s legal team seeks financial damages, they also call for accountability from those who pursued his case. “Defendants must now be held accountable for their malicious and unlawful pursuit of Baldwin,” the lawsuit states. But this aggressive counteraction has drawn criticism, especially given Baldwin’s role as a producer and central figure in the Rust tragedy.
Halyna Hutchins lost her life when Baldwin pointed a reproduction 1873 single-action revolver at her during a rehearsal. Baldwin has claimed he did not pull the trigger, but forensic evidence has suggested otherwise. The gun discharged a live round, allegedly loaded inadvertently by weapons handler Hannah Gutierrez Reed, who was later convicted of involuntary manslaughter and sentenced to 18 months in jail.
Baldwin’s defense has consistently emphasized that live rounds should never have been on set and that he bears no responsibility for the weapon’s safety. However, as a producer, Baldwin had a duty to ensure that safety protocols were followed, raising questions about his accountability beyond the moment of the shooting.
Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer dismissed Baldwin’s case, citing the “willful withholding” of evidence by the prosecution. She described the actions of the special prosecutor and sheriff’s office as showing “scorching prejudice.” Morrissey and the sheriff’s office filed evidence regarding the source of live rounds under a different case number, further complicating the investigation. Morrissey denies any wrongdoing, maintaining that the evidence handling was proper.
While Baldwin has filed his lawsuit, he must now prove that the defendants—public officials—are not protected by state laws granting immunity for actions taken within their official duties. This legal battle adds yet another layer of complexity to a case already fraught with controversy.
Critics argue that Baldwin’s lawsuit is an attempt to shift focus from his own responsibilities as both an actor and producer. While the prosecution’s errors are undeniable, Baldwin’s refusal to acknowledge any personal accountability has left many feeling that justice remains elusive for Hutchins’ family. The actor’s dismissal of any role in ensuring on-set safety—despite being one of the film’s key decision-makers—has fueled accusations of deflection.
This lawsuit may provide Baldwin with a platform to clear his name in court, but it also highlights broader issues about accountability in Hollywood. As calls for stricter safety protocols on film sets grow louder, Baldwin’s case serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of negligence and the legal quagmires that often follow.
Fox News host Laura Ingraham took aim at Joe Biden’s far-left Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland, a former New Mexico congresswoman, during a recent episode of “The Ingraham Angle,” referring to her as “another DEI hire of the Biden administration.”
The term “DEI” stands for diversity, equity, and inclusion—an approach embraced by woke organizations to hire people merely based on their skin color, gender, sexual orientation, or any other “diversity” factor while largely ignoring relevant qualifications.
The segment began as Ingraham and her guest, ex-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, discussed the devastating wildfires sweeping through the Los Angeles area. Thousands of acres have been scorched, forcing mass evacuations, with drought conditions and high winds worsening the crisis.
McCarthy highlighted the challenges firefighters face, saying, “Could you imagine a poor fireman coming in there and trying to put out a fire with no water? Gavin Newsom fought President Trump. He came in and changed the biological opinion. People know this in California – the little delta smelt – to bring the water down.”
Ingraham shifted the conversation to Haaland, who oversees agencies critical to managing public lands and natural resources. “And Deb Haaland, we gotta call her out too because she’s the interior secretary,” Ingraham stated. “Another DEI hire of the Biden administration. I’m sure she is a lovely person. She is completely incompetent. Completely incompetent. Totally.”
This is not the first time Haaland has faced criticism from conservative figures for her failures and complete lack of knowledge.
Her confirmation hearings were also a trainwreck, where she had trouble forming coherent sentences or giving direct answers, constantly repeating vague terms like “I understand” or “I appreciate what you are saying” without formulating tangible answers to give any information that could help senators understand her qualifications.
Sen. Jim Risch (R-ID) plainly asked Haaland, “Did you or do you now support the Biden action of shutting down the Keystone Pipeline his first day in office?” She refused to answer the question, responding, “I have to respect it, uh, Senator. He is the president of the United States, and I realize that, um, these are some of the things that he talked about when he was running for office.” Not until Sen. Risch had to press three more times did he get a vaguely discernible answer from Haaland, where she finally said, “I will tend to support President Biden’s positions. I assume you could take my answer as a yes.”
During one line of questioning by Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY), Haaland was asked why she made the statement that she would vote to legalize marijuana to account for lost jobs in the oil and gas industry due to extreme government regulation. She claimed her argument was merely one about “diversify[ing] our funding streams.”
Barrasso pressed her, “Is selling marijuana among what the Biden administration calls ‘better choices… to give jobs to displaced oil and gas workers?” Haaland said she didn’t know Biden’s position on the legalization of weed. Barrasso clapped back, “Well, we know what your stance is on replacing the revenue from the energy jobs… And your preference is to turn to drugs is what you’ve recommended to the voters.”
During another exchange, Haaland had difficulty answering basic questions about oil and gas pipelines on federal lands from Sen. James Lankford (R-OK), ultimately admitting she didn’t know the answer to the question.
In 2022, Haaland got wrecked over her failure to answer basic questions about oil leasing, telling a Republican senator, “I’m not an economist” to justify her lack of knowledge. She ended up furiously scribbling notes to hide her complete ineptitude.
WATCH: Democrat staffers furiously scribble notes for Biden Interior Secretary Deb Haaland as she struggles to get through her Senate testimony pic.twitter.com/pT4a1VO8Xx
In 2023, a Republican congressman proposed reducing her annual salary to $1, a move that ultimately failed. Earlier, she was involved in a heated exchange with Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO), who accused her of pursuing an “agenda for radical climate change.”
Secretary Haaland apparently doesn’t know who’s in charge of the Interior Department. Hint: it’s supposed to be her 👇 pic.twitter.com/c1BSXtiViW
The leftist website Mediaite reported on Ingraham’s comment, trying to paint Haaland as a historic figure due to her being “the first Native American to serve as a cabinet secretary.”
Despite some individuals attacking legal efforts for sanctuary cities for the unborn measures in New Mexico counties and municipalities by claiming they would create a constitutional right to abortion, the state Supreme Court today made very clear it would not make that determination in a lawsuit on the matter.
The ordinances were crafted using the federal Comstock Act, which prohibits the mailing of abortion-related materials, which would include the unsafe medication abortion pills.
Although the Court struck down these ordinances, it did write, “It is an enduring principle of constitutional jurisprudence that courts will avoid deciding constitutional questions unless required to do so,” adding, “Our forbearance of the constitutional questions, however, should not be construed as commentary on their merit. Rather, we heed the canon of constitutional avoidance and refrain from deciding constitutional issues unnecessary to the disposition of this case.”
During the case, Attorney General Raúl Torrez’s office argued that the ordinances violated the New Mexico Constitution’s Equal Rights Amendment, but the New Mexico Supreme Court declined that argument, writing, “We therefore decline to reach the State’s additional arguments under the New Mexico Constitution.”
The Court concluded, “We hold the Ordinances are preempted in their entirety based on the independent and adequate state law grounds provided in the Reproductive and Gender-Affirming Health Care Freedom Act, the Medical Practice Act, the Medical Malpractice Act, and the Health Care Code, as well as the Uniform Licensing Act.”
Now, the New Mexico Supreme Court, by ruling on the matter, has paved the way for the case to be taken to the U.S. Supreme Court. If the highest court in the land disagrees with the New Mexico Supreme Court that the Health Care Freedom Act explicitly preempts local regulations that interfere with access to reproductive health care, it could mean enforcement of a prohibition on trafficking abortion medications through the mail.
Attorney Jonathan Mitchell, who spearheaded these ordinances and worked on the litigation, wrote following the ruling, “We are thrilled with the New Mexico Supreme Court’s ruling.”
He added, “This is the first court to hold that an ordinance requiring compliance with the federal Comstock Act prohibits the shipment and receipt of abortion-related paraphernalia in states where abortion remains legal. We look forward to litigating these issues in other states and bringing the meaning of the federal Comstock Act to the Supreme Court of the United States.”
Senate Energy and Natural Resources ranking member Martin Heinrich, a far-left Democrat from New Mexico, is once again using his platform to grandstand, this time accusing Committee Chair Mike Lee of Utah of violating “protocol and precedent” over the scheduling of a confirmation hearing for President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for Interior secretary, former North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum.
In a statement rife with indignation, Heinrich lamented Lee’s decision to hold the hearing next Tuesday without all the necessary paperwork being submitted. “I am extremely disappointed that Chairman Lee has scheduled the first Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee confirmation hearing over my objection and before basic information has been given to the Committee. This is a breach of protocol and precedent, established over decades by Chairs of both parties,” Heinrich declared.
Heinrich, whose record is characterized by obstructionism and environmental extremism, claimed that nominees traditionally submit a questionnaire, financial disclosures, ethics approvals, and undergo an FBI check before hearings proceed. He refused to budge, stating, “Until these steps have been completed, I will not consent to notice of nomination hearings. Every nominee, every party, every administration should be subject to the same standards. I would urge Chairman Lee to reconsider his decision.”
Lee has not responded publicly to Heinrich’s objections, but the senator’s tactics appear to be a continuation of his pattern of attempting to stall progress under Republican leadership.
Meanwhile, Burgum has taken the high road, recently meeting with Heinrich and describing the interaction in positive terms. “Just really fun to talk to someone like Sen. Heinrich,” Burgum said, in part, graciously acknowledging New Mexico’s energy production success while joking about North Dakota’s place behind the state in national rankings.
If confirmed, Burgum would oversee public lands and wildlife conservation while holding significant influence over oil and gas leasing. A staunch advocate for expanding energy production and slashing overreaching environmental regulations, Burgum is expected to face opposition from Heinrich and his Democratic colleagues. However, his credentials as a two-term governor of an energy-rich state and his lack of scandal have garnered bipartisan respect, making his confirmation likely.
As part of his role, Burgum has been informally dubbed Trump’s “energy czar,” tasked with delivering on the administration’s promises of boosting domestic energy production and dismantling red tape that hinders industry growth.
While Heinrich’s obstructionist stance might score him points with his left-wing base, it does little to address the bipartisan concerns of American energy independence and conservation. His theatrics stand in stark contrast to Burgum’s pragmatic and solutions-focused approach, which is likely to resonate during the confirmation process.
In addition to Burgum, Heinrich is also expected to meet with Trump’s Department of Energy nominee, Chris Wright, later this week. Separately, hearings for EPA pick Lee Zeldin and other Trump nominees are moving forward, signaling that the administration’s efforts to enact its energy and environmental policies remain on track despite Heinrich’s predictable roadblocks.
