New Mexico

WaPo report: NM flips to Republican if SAVE America Act enacted

7 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

A new analysis highlighted by the Washington Post is turning heads in New Mexico after concluding that the proposed federal SAVE America Act could dramatically reshape the state’s political future — with researchers suggesting New Mexico could become significantly more competitive for Republicans if proof-of-citizenship voter registration requirements are enacted nationwide.

The opinion analysis, authored by Yale Law School professor Ian Ayres and researcher Jacob Slaughter, argues that while the national partisan effect of the legislation may be negligible overall, New Mexico stands out as one of the few states where the impact could be substantial.

Their conclusion: New Mexico may be one of the clearest examples in the country of a state where stricter voter registration verification requirements could disproportionately affect Democratic voters.

According to the Washington Post piece, Democrats in New Mexico are estimated to be 13 percentage points less likely than Republicans to possess the documentary proof of citizenship that would be required under the SAVE America Act for new voter registrations.

That gap, the authors argue, could eventually create a 3.3-point Republican advantage in the state’s electorate over time as voters move, re-register, age into eligibility, or otherwise need to register anew.

In plain English: a state long viewed as reliably blue could become dramatically more competitive.

The SAVE America Act — backed by President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans — would require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, such as a passport or birth certificate paired with photo ID.

Republicans have framed the bill as a common-sense election integrity measure designed to ensure only citizens vote in American elections.

But what makes the Washington Post’s analysis especially notable is that even critics of the bill are now openly acknowledging its potential political consequences for New Mexico.

The Post’s authors wrote that New Mexico is “the one clear exception” among major battleground and competitive states where the legislation appears likely to create a measurable Republican advantage.

That finding is already fueling new scrutiny over New Mexico’s voter registration system and raising broader questions about the composition of the state’s electorate.

The analysis also comes amid growing concern among Republicans about New Mexico’s recent shift to a semi-open primary system, which now allows declined-to-state voters to choose either party’s primary ballot.

Combined with longstanding debates over election security, automatic voter registration, and ballot access, the report is likely to intensify political battles over how elections are conducted in the Land of Enchantment.

Importantly, the SAVE America Act would not affect already-registered voters unless they need to re-register. But over time, researchers say the cumulative effect could materially alter the makeup of the electorate.

Nevada was the only other state identified by the Washington Post analysis as potentially seeing a significant Republican boost, though the projected shift there was smaller.

For New Mexico Republicans, the findings will likely reinforce arguments that the state is not inherently unwinnable — and that changes to election law and voter composition could reshape the map in coming years.

For Democrats, the report presents an uncomfortable data point from a left-leaning national outlet: the same publication criticizing the SAVE America Act is effectively acknowledging that New Mexico’s Democratic advantage may depend heavily on an electorate less likely to meet heightened citizenship-document standards.

Whether the SAVE America Act ultimately passes remains uncertain, with the legislation facing hurdles in the U.S. Senate, notably due to pushback from Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who has refused to take up the key voter integrity legislation in any meaningful way.

But one thing is now clear: according to even liberal legal analysts, if it does become law, New Mexico’s political future may look very different.

To contact GOP Leader John Thune and ask him to pass the SAVE America Act, his Washington, D.C. office number is (202) 224-2321.

WaPo report: NM flips to Republican if SAVE America Act enacted Read More »

Two candidates deadlocked in wild GOP lt. governor race

7 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

A new poll shows New Mexico’s Republican race for lieutenant governor is wide open — and with a stunning majority of voters still undecided, the contest could come down to who breaks through in the final stretch before primary day.

According to a new Albuquerque Journal poll, state Sen. David Gallegos and attorney Aubrey Blair Dunn are effectively tied in the GOP primary for lieutenant governor, with each earning roughly 20% support among likely Republican and participating independent primary voters. Meanwhile, candidate Manuel Lardizabal registered just 4%.

But the most eye-popping number in the survey may be this: 56% of voters remain undecided.

That means more than half of likely GOP primary voters have yet to make up their minds in the June 2 contest — a sign that the race remains completely fluid despite early positioning by the campaigns.

“Frankly, here we have a situation where I think most Republicans don’t even know who the candidates are,” pollster Brian Sanderoff of Research & Polling Inc. told the Albuquerque Journal.

The lieutenant governor race is the only statewide Republican primary contest this year outside of the gubernatorial race, but it has largely flown under the radar as candidates for governor dominate headlines and fundraising.

Under New Mexico law, lieutenant governor candidates run separately in the primary but are paired with the gubernatorial nominee for the general election — a structure that often leaves the down-ballot race overshadowed until late in the cycle.

Still, this year’s contest is shaping up to be more competitive than many expected.

Gallegos, who represents Eunice in the state Senate and previously served four terms in the House, entered the race with backing from much of the Republican establishment and won the most support at the GOP pre-primary convention in March.

But Dunn has positioned himself as an outsider willing to challenge party insiders. He recently joined litigation filed in Otero County alleging that Republican Party officials improperly meddled in contested primaries and seeking the removal of state GOP Chairwoman Amy Barela.

The poll suggests the race may be shaping along geographic and demographic lines.

According to the Journal’s reporting, Dunn performs better among Anglo voters and older Republicans, particularly seniors 65 and older, where he leads Gallegos 22% to 14%.

That advantage may stem in part from his family name. Dunn is the son of former Land Commissioner Aubrey Dunn Jr. and grandson of longtime state Sen. Aubrey Dunn Sr., giving him residual recognition among older Republican voters familiar with New Mexico political history.

Gallegos, meanwhile, reportedly performs better among Hispanic voters and holds an advantage in eastern New Mexico — his political home turf.

Regionally, Dunn leads by five points in the Albuquerque metro area, while Gallegos leads by five in eastern New Mexico, according to the Journal poll. Those regional divides could intensify as campaigns focus on turning out their geographic bases.

Another wildcard in the race is New Mexico’s new semi-open primary system.

This is the first major election cycle in which declined-to-state and independent voters may choose to vote in either party’s primary without changing party registration. The Journal found Gallegos currently leading among those independent voters planning to participate in the GOP primary.

But with such an overwhelming share of undecided voters, the effect of that new voting bloc remains uncertain.

In practical terms, the race is still anyone’s to win.

With no candidate above 20%, minimal statewide name recognition, and more than half the electorate undecided, the lieutenant governor primary may become one of the most volatile and unpredictable Republican contests on the ballot.

The numbers suggest one thing clearly: while insiders may have favorites, Republican voters have not yet settled on one.

And with early voting underway soon, whoever defines himself fastest in the coming weeks may seize the nomination.

Polling cited from the Albuquerque Journal / Research & Polling Inc. survey conducted April 24–May 1 among 528 likely GOP and participating independent primary voters, margin of error ±4.3 percentage points.

Two candidates deadlocked in wild GOP lt. governor race Read More »

Haaland’s ‘debate’ panned as far-left game show for progressive activists

14 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Saturday’s Democrat gubernatorial “debate” looked less like a serious forum for voters and more like a carefully curated progressive showcase — complete with activist-selected questions, audience participation gimmicks, and even a pre-debate game show format.

Former Interior Secretary Deb Haaland and Bernalillo County District Attorney Sam Bregman took the stage at Central New Mexico Community College for what organizers branded “The Debate Games,” the only scheduled faceoff between the two Democrats before the June 2 primary. But unlike the recent Republican gubernatorial debate aired by KOAT-TV, Saturday’s event was not a traditional journalist-moderated debate focused on broad voter concerns.

Instead, the event was organized by the left-wing nonprofit Dukes Up and featured questions sourced from progressive activist organizations including the American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico, Indivisible Albuquerque, Jewish Voice for Peace, and the Center for Biological Diversity, among others. 

According to New Mexico PBS, the event also included a system where audience members waved flags to determine whether candidates had answered questions sufficiently — with candidates losing speaking time if the crowd disapproved.

Even Bregman, who had spent months demanding Haaland debate him, admitted afterward that the event was no real debate.

“It wasn’t a debate,” Bregman told reporters, criticizing the format as overly narrow and saying the audience and question pool did not reflect a true cross-section of New Mexico voters, according to the Santa Fe New Mexican and Source New Mexico.

“This is actually special interest groups asking questions,” Bregman said before the event. “I don’t think anybody should be fooled into thinking that this is a real debate, because it simply is not,” he added, per the Santa Fe New Mexican.

Despite their occasional differences in tone, the two Democrats were largely aligned on core policy issues throughout the evening.

Both candidates blasted President Donald Trump and vowed to oppose federal immigration enforcement efforts. Haaland declared the country is in a “break-glass moment” and accused Trump of “wreaking havoc” on New Mexico, according to Source New Mexico. Bregman similarly pledged to confront immigration agents he says violate constitutional rights.

On economic issues, both candidates embraced expanded tax credits and further government intervention to address affordability. Both also backed continuation of New Mexico’s universal child care program.

Where the candidates diverged most noticeably was on energy and environmental issues.

Haaland took a hardline stance against major data center projects like Project Jupiter in Doña Ana County, saying, “I just believe very strongly that data centers don’t have the best interests of our community at heart,” according to Source New Mexico.

Bregman, by contrast, struck a more measured tone, saying data centers “if done right” could benefit communities and bring substantial construction jobs.

The candidates also split over produced water reuse from oil and gas operations. Haaland opposed broader reuse, saying “the science is still out” and warning the water could be dangerous if released into the environment. Bregman appeared more open to treated reuse, likening it to recycled wastewater used in parks and golf courses.

On the proposed Blackstone takeover of PNM Resources, Haaland sharply attacked private equity, saying such firms are accountable to “their shareholders, not the community, not New Mexicans,” while Bregman said the utility may need outside capital but insisted any deal must include protections against rate hikes.

Throughout the event, however, little direct confrontation occurred between the candidates, with both mostly using their time to tout their own records and “progressive” credentials rather than meaningfully sparring.

The event ended with the audience chanting “Deb, Deb, Deb!” — underscoring what many observers noted was a heavily pro-Haaland atmosphere.

With Haaland already leading comfortably in polling, Saturday’s so-called “Debate Games” did little to resemble the kind of substantive, broadly focused debate voters typically expect in a gubernatorial race.

Instead, it served primarily as a progressive policy showcase — and one that even one of the participants declined to call a real debate.The “debate” will air Thursday on New Mexico PBS’ YouTube channel at 7:00 p.m.

Haaland’s ‘debate’ panned as far-left game show for progressive activists Read More »

Planned Parenthood takes ‘great pride’ in NM’s trans patient surge

16 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

New Mexico’s far-left political leadership has transformed the state into a regional destination for abortion and transgender-related medical procedures, with new reporting from the Albuquerque Journal showing a sharp increase in out-of-state patients traveling here for hormone treatments and other so-called “gender-affirming care.”

According to the Journal, Planned Parenthood clinics in New Mexico have seen a 50% increase in patients seeking hormonal transgender treatments over the past six months, with half of those patients coming from outside New Mexico.

The influx comes as neighboring conservative states such as Texas and Utah have enacted restrictions on unproven and scientifically unproven so-called “transgender” medical interventions for minors and tightened abortion laws—while New Mexico Democrats have moved aggressively in the opposite direction, positioning the Land of Enchantment as one of the most permissive states in the nation for both abortion and transgender procedures.

Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains CEO Adrianne Mansanares celebrated the trend, telling the Journal that New Mexico is “one of the most welcoming states” for gender-related medical care.

“I take great pride in that,” Mansanares said. “It’s really wonderful that people see New Mexico as a place where they can come.”

That “welcome mat” did not happen by accident.

In 2023, New Mexico Democrats rammed through legislation shielding providers of transgender-related medical care from out-of-state legal actions and strengthening legal protections for patients seeking such treatments. The same Democratic majority has also enacted sweeping abortion protections, helping make New Mexico a destination for late-term abortion and other controversial procedures.

Republicans argue the state has gone far beyond simply protecting adult choice and has embraced an increasingly radical social agenda.

“Whether it’s abortion or transgender services, the most fundamental failure of Planned Parenthood is that they don’t provide options so much as they push their views on highly impressionable people,” Republican Party of New Mexico Chairwoman Amy Barela told the Journal.

She also criticized taxpayer support flowing to organizations like Planned Parenthood through Medicaid reimbursements and other state contracts.

The Journal highlighted the story of Grace Dukes, a 19-year-old transgender-identifying patient whose family left Texas after that state banned transgender hormone treatments for minors. Dukes said Texas officials “betrayed” families by restricting such procedures.

But many New Mexicans view those restrictions differently—seeing them as parental-rights and child-protection measures.

New Mexico’s Democratic leadership, by contrast, has aligned itself firmly with activist groups and providers pushing expanded access to both abortion and transgender interventions, even as the issue becomes increasingly divisive nationally.

The result is that New Mexico is no longer merely tolerating these controversial procedures—it is actively becoming a hub for them.

As the Journal’s reporting makes clear, out-of-state demand is rising rapidly.

That may be welcome news for Planned Parenthood and progressive activists, but for many residents it raises a larger question: why are New Mexico’s leaders working so hard to turn the state into the Southwest’s destination for abortion and gender-transition medicine while the state continues to rank near the bottom nationally in education, child well-being, and violent crime?

Instead of fixing New Mexico’s chronic failures, Democratic leaders appear intent on building a national reputation for exporting progressive social policy.

And increasingly, people are coming here for exactly that.

Planned Parenthood takes ‘great pride’ in NM’s trans patient surge Read More »

Massive undecided vote keeps GOP governor primary in flux

9 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

A new poll suggests former Rio Rancho Mayor Gregg Hull, who is endorsed by New Mexico State University College Republicans, currently holds the edge in New Mexico’s Republican gubernatorial primary, but with a massive share of voters still undecided, the race remains far from settled just weeks before ballots are cast.

According to a new poll conducted by Research & Polling Inc. for the Albuquerque Journal, Hull leads the Republican field with 30% support among likely GOP and participating independent primary voters. Small businessman Doug Turner follows with 21%, while former Cabinet secretary and businessman Duke Rodriguez trails at 9%. A striking 40% of respondents remain undecided, underscoring how fluid the race still is heading into early voting.

“Republican voters are still getting to know their three candidates for governor, so the race is up for grabs,” pollster Brian Sanderoff told the Albuquerque Journal.

The numbers suggest that while Hull has built an early advantage, no candidate has yet consolidated the Republican electorate in the open-seat contest to replace term-limited Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham.

One likely factor is name recognition. As the Journal noted, none of the three Republican contenders has previously held statewide or federal elected office, leaving many voters still unfamiliar with the field. Hull’s current lead may be aided by his 12-year tenure as mayor of Rio Rancho, the state’s third-largest city, giving him stronger visibility in the Albuquerque metro area and north-central New Mexico.

That regional strength appears to be fueling his advantage. The poll found Hull holds a commanding lead in both the Albuquerque metro and north-central parts of the state.

However, the race is far more competitive elsewhere.

Turner, who is endorsed by former Congresswoman Yvette Herrell, outperformed Hull in eastern New Mexico, traditionally one of the state’s most conservative regions, where 27% of voters surveyed backed Turner compared to 19% for Hull, according to the Journal. In southern and southwestern New Mexico, meanwhile, more than half of voters remain undecided, suggesting that region could become a decisive late battleground.

Rodriguez, who has the endorsement of former Gov. Gary Johnson, while trailing overall, showed stronger support among independent voters participating in the GOP primary under New Mexico’s new semi-open primary system. The Journal reported that 14% of independent voters surveyed backed Rodriguez, higher than his showing among registered Republicans.

A political action committee called Protect Our NM has been casting doubt on Rodriguez’s eligibility for the ballot via mailers, writing, “If Duke Rodriguez becomes the Republican nominee, Democrats could file to remove him from the ballot—potentially clearing the way for their far-left candidate to become governor with no Republican opposition.” It is unclear who is funding the the PAC, overseen by prominent political consultant Chris Cupit, but it will become evident when the next campaign filings are due in mid-May.

This comes as allies of Rodriguez’s campaign have been attacking Turner for alleged COVID-19-era contracts, which they are claiming are tied to Democrat Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham. Those claims, however, have not yet been substantiated with facts.

This year marks the first primary election under New Mexico’s semi-open primary law, which allows declined-to-state voters to choose a Republican or Democratic ballot without changing party registration. The impact of those voters remains uncertain, but their participation adds a new variable to the race.

The poll also highlights the fundraising disadvantage Republicans face heading into the general election. According to the Journal, the three Republican candidates combined had raised only about $1.5 million as of last month, compared to nearly $11 million raised by Democratic frontrunner Deb Haaland.

Still, the GOP primary itself remains highly competitive.

Unlike bruising primaries seen in other states, the three Republican candidates have largely avoided attacking one another so far, instead focusing their fire on Democrats and outlining similar conservative policy priorities. They largely agreed during this week’s KOAT gubernatorial debate, with one notable disagreement over the future of the state fairgrounds.

With early voting beginning Tuesday and four in ten Republican voters still undecided, the next several weeks could prove decisive.

Hull may currently lead, but the latest polling suggests New Mexico Republicans have not yet made up their minds — and the GOP nomination remains very much in play.

Republican candidates split on major NM issues in TV debate

Massive undecided vote keeps GOP governor primary in flux Read More »

Fashion magazine, MS NOW celebrate MLG being NM’s freebie queen

18 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Democrat Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham is being celebrated by left-wing media and fashion elites as a national “Power Mom” for turning New Mexico into a testing ground for taxpayer-funded progressive social programs.

Lujan Grisham announced this week that she has been named to Marie Claire’s 2026 “Power Moms” list, an honor bestowed by the fashion and lifestyle publication on women it says are “making a difference for women and children.” The governor is set to receive the award Thursday night at an event in New York City.

The recognition comes largely because of her push to make New Mexico the first state in the nation to offer so-called “universal child care,” a sweeping taxpayer-funded entitlement program she has repeatedly touted as a national model.

“What an honor to join Marie Claire magazine’s 2026 list of ‘Power Moms’ making a difference for women and children!” Lujan Grisham wrote on X. “When we empower women by helping them with child care everyone wins.”

The governor also thanked MS NOW (formerly MSNBC) personality Mika Brzezinski and the hosts of Morning Joe for highlighting New Mexico’s program in a glowing segment on Friday, where the panel praised Grisham for her progressive agenda.

Brzezinski gushed to the governor, “You’re on this list, again, for your determination in making New Mexico the first state in the nation to offer universal child care.”

Meanwhile, Marie Claire Editor-in-Chief Nikki Ogunnaike applauded Grisham for “tak[ing] a stand for universal child care,” adding that the women honored this year are “reshaping the culture around motherhood.”

The magazine’s profile of Lujan Grisham, titled “Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, the Universal Child Care Whisperer,” portrays the governor as a trailblazer for building what it frames as a groundbreaking new welfare model.

Marie Claire praised her for using New Mexico’s oil and gas wealth to help balloon the state’s Early Childhood Trust Fund from $320 million in 2020 to $9 billion by 2024, providing the financial backbone for the program.

But the accolades come as the governor’s signature “freebie” program faces mounting legal and political trouble at home.

As previously reported first by Piñon Post, Republican gubernatorial candidate Duke Rodriguez recently scored an early courtroom victory against the administration after a district judge ordered the state to cease enforcement of several child care regulations tied to the program unless officials can justify them in court.

Rodriguez’s lawsuit alleges the administration unlawfully created the universal child care program without proper legislative authorization, without sufficient appropriation, and without following required rulemaking procedures.

The court’s Alternative Writ of Mandamus stated the challenged rules may have been enacted “without legislative authorization and without the necessary appropriation.”

That legal cloud has done little to stop national progressive media from celebrating Grisham’s agenda.

In addition to universal child care, Marie Claire highlighted several other taxpayer-funded initiatives championed by the governor, including:

  • 12 weeks of paid parental leave for state employees
  • Universal free school meals for K-12 students
  • Plans to expand paid leave mandates further statewide

To supporters, Grisham is a progressive innovator. To critics, she is simply the latest Democrat governor using temporary oil and gas windfalls to build an ever-expanding welfare state while seeking praise from elite national media.

The irony, critics note, is that while New York media outlets celebrate New Mexico as a progressive policy laboratory, many working New Mexicans continue to struggle with rising crime, poor schools, and one of the nation’s worst poverty rates.

Nonetheless, in the eyes of Manhattan magazine editors and MS NOW hosts, Lujan Grisham’s legacy appears secure: New Mexico’s “freebie queen” is now a certified “Power Mom.”

Fashion magazine, MS NOW celebrate MLG being NM’s freebie queen Read More »

Wealthy out-of-state buyers driving Santa Fe to the top of luxury market

4 Comments / New Mexico, News / By

A new national housing ranking is shining a spotlight on a trend many longtime New Mexicans say they have watched unfold for years: wealthy out-of-state buyers increasingly flooding into Santa Fe and driving the city’s luxury real estate market to new heights.

According to a new Wall Street Journal/Realtor.com luxury housing market ranking, Santa Fe has claimed the title of the nation’s hottest luxury housing market for Spring 2026, leapfrogging 18 spots from its prior position to take the No. 1 ranking in the country.

The report points to a surge in affluent buyers seeking a slower-paced lifestyle, favorable tax treatment, and perceived “climate resilience” as key drivers behind Santa Fe’s meteoric rise.

Larry Lamsa, Wiki Commons.

“What makes Santa Fe’s case compelling is the breadth of its strengths,” Realtor.com senior economist Anthony Smith said in the report. “This is not a market that wins in a single category.”

The report found that homes in the top 10% of Santa Fe’s market now carry a median price of $2.69 million, with entry-level luxury prices jumping 11.3% year-over-year, even as luxury prices nationally declined.

Even more striking, vacation homes account for roughly three times the national average in the Santa Fe metro, according to Realtor.com, underscoring the degree to which the city has become a destination for luxury retreats and investment properties rather than just primary residences.

Much of that demand is coming from outside New Mexico.

Dconvertini, Wiki Commons.

According to the report, nearly 70% of buyers browsing Santa Fe listings are located outside the state, with the biggest outside-market interest coming from Phoenix, Denver, and Albuquerque.

The data reinforce a growing perception that Santa Fe’s housing market is increasingly being shaped not by local wages or local demand, but by affluent buyers relocating from wealthier metropolitan areas and bringing outside money into a relatively small market.

Smith cited Santa Fe’s low property tax rates of roughly 0.45%, short average commute times, and low climate-risk exposure as among the factors attracting wealthy buyers.

“Climate is another strong point, with the risk exposure being minimal, a factor that has become increasingly relevant as buyers weigh long-term value,” Smith said.

MARELBU, Wiki Commons.

The city’s long-standing appeal is also helping fuel the boom. Realtor.com highlighted Santa Fe’s renowned arts scene, historic architecture, outdoor recreation, and cultural identity as major draws for buyers seeking a luxury lifestyle market outside of traditional urban centers.

“For those buyers, Santa Fe offers a rare combination: cultural richness, natural beauty, and a cost structure that rewards rather than penalizes the luxury buyer,” Smith added.

Santa Fe’s ascent reflects a broader national trend away from dense urban luxury markets and toward smaller lifestyle-driven metros. Realtor.com noted that four of the top five luxury housing markets now have populations under 350,000, suggesting wealthy buyers are increasingly prioritizing quality of life over traditional prestige markets.

As Santa Fe continues attracting out-of-state wealth, housing prices in the region remain far out of reach for many local families, young professionals, and even middle-class residents.

What real estate analysts celebrate as a booming market, others increasingly view as the continued transformation of Santa Fe into a playground for wealthy outsiders.

Whether seen as economic growth or cultural displacement, one thing is clear: Santa Fe is no longer simply New Mexico’s historic capital—it is now one of the most sought-after luxury housing destinations in America.

Wealthy out-of-state buyers driving Santa Fe to the top of luxury market Read More »

New Mexico’s voter rolls are changing fast after primary overhaul

14 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

New voter registration data suggest New Mexico’s political landscape may be shifting in ways that could reshape future primaries, with both major parties losing registrants while “declined to state” voters surge following Democrats’ overhaul of the state’s primary election system.

According to the latest 2026 voter registration update compiled by Decision Desk HQ, New Mexico now has 1,422,544 total registered voters, with Democrats maintaining a registration advantage of 130,077 voters over Republicans. But beneath the surface, the latest numbers show notable movement away from both major parties and toward independent registration.

Democrats currently hold 573,297 registered voters, Republicans have 443,220, and voters registered as “other” or declined to state (DTS) now total 406,027.

Compared to April, Democrat registration dropped by 257 voters, while Republican registration fell by 378. Meanwhile, DTS/other registration surged by 6,731 voters in just one month.

The spike comes less than a year after Democrats and a handful of Republicans in the New Mexico Legislature passed legislation opening partisan primary elections to independent and DTS voters for the first time in state history.

Under the new law, voters registered as DTS can now choose either a Republican or Democrat ballot in the primary without permanently changing their registration, a major departure from New Mexico’s longtime closed-primary system.

Critics warned at the time that the change would incentivize voters to abandon party registration altogether while still participating in partisan nomination contests, potentially diluting party identity and encouraging crossover voting.

The newest numbers may be showing exactly that.

Since November 2024, Democrat registration has fallen from 590,301 to 573,297, a drop of 17,004 voters. Republicans have grown modestly from 435,362 to 443,220, a gain of 7,858, but that increase is dwarfed by the growth in DTS/other registration, which exploded from 351,422 to 406,027, an increase of 54,605 voters.

That means unaffiliated and third-party registration has grown nearly seven times faster than Republican registration since the last presidential election.

The trend raises significant questions about how the new semi-open primary system may affect both parties, particularly in competitive primaries where independent voters could now help determine nominees.

Some political observers speculate that left-leaning voters may be strategically registering DTS to preserve the ability to participate in either party’s primary depending on where they believe they can have the most influence. Others argue many voters simply prefer no formal party affiliation now that they can still cast a primary ballot.

Regardless of motive, the numbers suggest New Mexico’s electorate is becoming less tied to party labels even as Democrats continue to hold a substantial registration edge.

Still, that Democrat advantage has been shrinking over time.

In November 2016, Democrats led Republicans in registration by 199,883 voters.
By November 2020, that lead had fallen to 185,848.
By November 2022, it was 177,966.
By November 2024, it had narrowed further to 154,939.
Now, as of May 2026, the Democrat advantage stands at 130,077.

That represents a total Democrat registration advantage decline of nearly 70,000 voters over the past decade.

Yet despite the narrowing registration gap, Democrats still won New Mexico in the 2024 presidential election by just 6 points, according to the graphic.

Whether the continued rise of DTS voters ultimately benefits Republicans, Democrats, or neither remains to be seen.

New Mexico’s voter rolls are changing fast after primary overhaul Read More »

Meta drops bombshell warning ahead of NM trial

30 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Social media giant Meta is threatening to shut down access to Facebook, Instagram, and even WhatsApp in New Mexico if a judge orders the company to implement sweeping child-safety mandates sought by Attorney General Raúl Torrez.

The warning comes ahead of a bench trial beginning Monday in Santa Fe, where the New Mexico Department of Justice will seek court-ordered reforms to Meta’s platforms after previously securing a $375 million jury verdict against the company for violating the state’s consumer protection laws.

According to newly unsealed court filings first reported by Source New Mexico and expanded upon by The Verge, Meta says the state’s requested relief is so broad and burdensome that compliance may be impossible—leaving a full withdrawal from New Mexico as its only realistic option.

“Granting this onerous relief could compel Meta to entirely withdraw Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp from the State as the only feasible means of compliance,” the company said in its filing.

Meta argues that New Mexico’s demands would require the company to build entirely separate New Mexico-specific versions of its platforms, which it says would make little economic or engineering sense.

Mariia Shalabaieva, Unsplash.

“It does not make economic or engineering sense for Meta to build separate apps just for New Mexico residents,” the filing states.

The company further argued that many of the state’s proposed mandates are “technologically or practically infeasible,” and that some are so vague they violate Meta’s due process rights because the company would have no clear way of knowing whether it was in compliance.

Among the most aggressive changes sought by Torrez, according to court filings and reporting from The Verge and the New York Post, are requirements that Meta:

  • Ban infinite scroll, autoplay, and push notifications during school and sleeping hours for minors
  • Cap New Mexico minors’ use of Meta platforms at 90 hours per month
  • Implement age-verification systems for users
  • Detect 99 percent of newly uploaded child sexual abuse material (CSAM)
  • Reject underage accounts with near-perfect accuracy
  • Prohibit end-to-end encryption for minors
  • Display warning labels about risks associated with platform use
  • Permanently ban adults found engaging in child exploitation
  • Submit to oversight by an independent compliance monitor or committee

Meta says many of those requirements are unrealistic and impossible to guarantee in practice.

“Nor could Meta guarantee the perfection the State demands, making it impractical for Meta to operate in New Mexico,” the company argued.

Attorney General Torrez blasted the threat, accusing Meta of putting profits ahead of children’s safety.

“Meta is showing the world how little it cares about child safety,” Torrez said in a statement reported by KOAT 7.

“Meta’s refusal to follow the laws that protect our kids tells you everything you need to know about this company and the character of its leaders.”

Torrez also rejected Meta’s argument that the requested reforms are impossible, asserting the company has repeatedly altered its products and policies when it served its business interests.

“For years the company has rewritten its own rules, redesigned its products, and even bent to the demands of dictators to preserve market access,” Torrez said. “Meta simply refuses to place the safety of children ahead of engagement, advertising revenue, and profit.”

The current bench trial is the second phase of New Mexico’s broader legal battle against Meta, which began in December 2023, when Torrez sued the company and CEO Mark Zuckerberg, alleging Meta knowingly designed addictive products harmful to children and failed to adequately protect minors from exploitation.

Meta has said it plans to appeal the jury’s prior $375 million verdict.

The case is drawing national attention as one of the most aggressive state-level attempts yet to force judicial restructuring of a major social media platform’s business model.

If the judge grants New Mexico’s requested injunction and Meta follows through on its threat, New Mexico could become the first state in the nation to lose access to Meta’s core social media platforms as a result of court-ordered regulatory demands.

Meta drops bombshell warning ahead of NM trial Read More »

Republican candidates split on major NM issues in TV debate

26 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

New Mexico’s three Republican gubernatorial candidates squared off Wednesday night in a televised, 30-minute KOAT debate, offering voters a clearer picture of where the GOP primary contenders stand on taxes, education, crime, immigration, and the future of the state fairgrounds as the June 2 primary approaches.

The debate featured Rio Rancho Mayor Gregg Hull, businessman and former Human Services Secretary Duke Rodriguez, and businessman Doug Turner.

While the candidates largely agreed on broad conservative themes such as cutting taxes, supporting ICE detention contracts, and criticizing Democratic Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham’s outgoing administration, the debate also revealed notable differences on policy specifics and governing style.

All three candidates pointed to New Mexico’s crime and education crises as top priorities, though each emphasized different root causes and solutions.

Rodriguez argued crime is the state’s single biggest issue, saying it touches nearly every other policy area.

“When we deal with crime, we talk about fixing poverty, fixing a failing education system, dealing with mental health, addiction,” Rodriguez said. “All those issues collide.”

Hull, meanwhile, said education is the foundational issue.

“If we’re not educating our kids, we are failing them,” Hull said, arguing better schools would strengthen the workforce and reduce long-term crime.

Turner focused heavily on educational outcomes and CYFD failures, noting that nearly half of New Mexico’s third graders cannot read at grade level.

“We have been failing our children in this state for 30 years, and that has to end now,” Turner said.

All three Republicans blasted the recently enacted law banning local governments from contracting with ICE detention facilities.

Turner argued the law harms rural economies and makes little practical sense.

“ICE is going to use facilities somewhere,” Turner said. “They might as well go to our state and promote economic growth in those communities.”

Rodriguez said the law unfairly assumes New Mexico counties cannot run detention facilities humanely.

Hull said shutting down such contracts “sends a message that we’re not willing to hold people accountable.”

Perhaps the strongest consensus of the night came on tax reform, with all three candidates calling for major reductions.

Rodriguez took the most aggressive stance, promising sweeping tax elimination.

“I said eliminate state personal income tax,” Rodriguez declared. “Eliminate New Mexico gross receipts tax on all retail sales.”

Hull similarly endorsed eliminating the state income tax while calling for broader reform of gross receipts and property taxes.

Turner proposed reducing the personal income tax to 3% over time while also pursuing long-term gross receipts tax reform.

The debate’s clearest divide emerged over the future of Expo New Mexico and the state fairgrounds.

Hull strongly backed keeping the fairgrounds in its current Albuquerque location.

“The state fair needs to stay right where it’s at,” Hull said, calling it part of the city’s and state’s identity.

Turner broke with Hull, arguing the site should be redeveloped for more productive uses and the fair moved elsewhere.

“We’re 32,000 housing units short in this state,” Turner said, suggesting the land could be used for housing, a stadium, or other redevelopment.

Rodriguez took a middle-ground approach, saying the decision should be left to the next administration after stakeholder input.

The candidates also offered varying critiques of the state’s universal child care program.

Rodriguez, who recently sued the Lujan Grisham administration over the initiative, reiterated that he supports child care assistance but argued the current rollout is unlawful and unsustainable.

“It has to be a program that is lawful, legal, and sustainable,” Rodriguez said.

Turner said he supports the concept but wants means testing added.

“An extremely wealthy person shouldn’t have the state paying for their child care,” Turner said.

Hull questioned whether the state has the infrastructure and budget capacity to sustain the program long-term.

With early voting beginning May 5, the debate gave Republican voters one of their final major opportunities to compare the three candidates side by side.

Though all three candidates offered similar criticism of Democratic governance, Wednesday’s debate showed meaningful differences in tone, priorities, and policy specifics that could shape the outcome of the increasingly competitive GOP primary.

The winner will advance to face the Democratic nominee in November, along with independent candidate former Las Cruces Mayor Ken Miyagishima.

WATCH:

Republican candidates split on major NM issues in TV debate Read More »

1 2 3 4 5 6 … 258
Scroll to Top