Piñon Post

New PFAS rule to require companies to label products sold in NM

Leave a Comment / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

New Mexico is once again leading the nation in aggressive environmental regulation, this time approving a first-in-the-nation rule that will require warning labels on consumer products containing so-called “forever chemicals,” also known as PFAS.

The New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board voted Monday to approve a rule that will phase out PFAS in certain consumer products and require warning labels on others, according to the Santa Fe New Mexican. Products containing intentionally added PFAS will soon be required to carry a label warning consumers, with the labeling requirement expected to begin as early as January 2027.

The label will include a symbol — a conical flask icon with the acronym “PFAS” — intended to alert consumers that the product contains the chemicals. Environment Secretary James Kenney said the icon is meant to act as a universal warning symbol for shoppers. “That image will serve the universal language of identity and provide whoever is shopping the ability to understand what we’re trying to convey: There’s PFAS in this product,” Kenney said.

PFAS, short for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are used in a wide range of products including waterproof clothing, nonstick cookware, food packaging, carpets, cosmetics, and cleaning products. The chemicals are known as “forever chemicals” because they do not break down easily in the environment and can accumulate in the human body.

Under the new rule, some products containing PFAS — including cookware, food packaging, toys, dental floss, and firefighting foam — will be phased out starting in 2027. Other products such as cosmetics, carpets, and cleaning products will follow in later years, with the state ultimately aiming to eliminate PFAS from most consumer goods by 2032, according to a legal analysis published by the National Law Review.

But the most controversial part of the rule may be the labeling requirement itself. According to the National Law Review, New Mexico has become the first state in the country to require consumer-facing warning labels on all products containing PFAS, even if those products are otherwise exempt from phase-out requirements.

The legal publication warned that the labeling law could have major consequences for businesses and manufacturers. The rule “forces companies to answer the fundamental question of whether a product contains PFAS in less than ten months,” the analysis states, creating a compressed timeline for companies to test and disclose chemical content.

The publication also warned that the labels could expose companies to lawsuits, noting that plaintiff attorneys often use publicly disclosed chemical information to file consumer fraud, personal injury, and environmental lawsuits. There is “no reason to believe that the PFAS warning labels that New Mexico requires would not be monitored and tracked by the same attorneys,” the report states.

In other words, the labeling requirement may not just inform consumers — it could also create a roadmap for litigation.

Businesses throughout the supply chain are now being urged to evaluate their PFAS risk, as lawsuits related to PFAS contamination and product use are already increasing across the country.

Meanwhile, state health officials say there is currently no approved way to remove PFAS from the human body, meaning the only current recommendation is to reduce exposure.

The new rule represents a major regulatory expansion in New Mexico and could have wide-ranging effects on manufacturers, retailers, and consumers alike — from product availability to prices to potential legal battles — as the state moves forward with one of the most aggressive PFAS regulatory frameworks in the country.

New PFAS rule to require companies to label products sold in NM Read More »

Heinrich delivers ‘surprise’ vote on Trump DHS nominee

13 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

U.S. Sen. Martin Heinrich, a Democrat often aligned with the party’s progressive wing, is drawing national attention after casting what he described as a “surprise” vote in favor of confirming President Donald Trump’s nominee, U.S. Sen. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma, to serve as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.

The U.S. Senate confirmed Mullin on March 23 in a 54–45 vote that was largely along party lines. Heinrich and U.S. Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania were the only two Democrats to vote in favor of the Trump nominee. All but one Republican supported Mullin, while Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky voted against the confirmation.

Heinrich had signaled his position ahead of the vote, releasing a statement explaining his decision and acknowledging that some would view his vote as unexpected given the highly partisan nature of the confirmation.

“This is going to surprise some people, but I consider Markwayne Mullin a friend,” Heinrich wrote.

In his statement, Heinrich said his decision was based largely on his working relationship with Mullin and the needs of New Mexico, particularly when it comes to border security and federal agencies operating in the state.

“I consider Markwayne a friend and someone with whom I have a very honest and constructive working relationship,” Heinrich said. He noted the two senators have worked together on bipartisan legislation, including the Tribal Buffalo Management Act and the Legislative Branch Appropriations bill.

Heinrich said that while he frequently disagrees with Mullin politically, he believes Mullin is independent and willing to stand up to pressure.

“I have also seen first-hand that Markwayne is not someone who can simply be bullied into changing his views,” Heinrich said. He added that he hopes Mullin will serve as a Homeland Security Secretary who does not “take their orders from Stephen Miller,” referring to the Trump adviser known for hardline immigration policies.

Heinrich framed his vote largely around New Mexico-specific concerns, noting that the state shares a long stretch of the U.S.-Mexico border and is home to hundreds of federal employees working for DHS agencies such as Customs and Border Protection, Border Patrol, and the Transportation Security Administration.

He also said he has struggled to maintain a constructive relationship with DHS leadership in recent years and wants a secretary he can directly communicate with on issues affecting New Mexico.

Heinrich said he believes Mullin understands the need for a border strategy tailored to the Southwest’s “unique terrain” and supports a balance of infrastructure, technology, and personnel.

He also pointed to Mullin’s statements during his confirmation hearing indicating support for requiring judicial warrants in certain immigration enforcement actions, which Heinrich said was an important factor in his decision.

Despite Heinrich’s reasoning, the vote stood in sharp contrast to the overwhelming majority of Democrats, who opposed Mullin over concerns about immigration enforcement policies, qualifications, and the broader Trump administration agenda.

The confirmation was described by national media outlets as “mostly along party lines,” but Heinrich’s vote — along with Fetterman’s — gave the confirmation a small but notable bipartisan element, something that has become increasingly rare in modern cabinet confirmations.

Mullin, a sitting U.S. senator prior to his confirmation, was known for having personal relationships across the aisle, which analysts say may have helped him secure the two Democratic votes.

Heinrich’s vote is likely to draw scrutiny from both sides of the political aisle, as Democrats continue to oppose Trump’s immigration policies while border security remains a major issue in New Mexico and across the Southwest.

Regardless of the political reaction, Heinrich’s vote marked one of the few instances of a Democrat supporting a Trump cabinet nominee, making it a notable break from party-line voting and one that quickly drew national attention.

Heinrich delivers ‘surprise’ vote on Trump DHS nominee Read More »

NM makes national news over gaps in Epstein ‘Truth Commission’ probe

10 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

New Mexico is once again making national headlines after reports surfaced raising questions about the apparent lack of action by the state’s so-called “Truth Commission” tasked with investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s activities tied to Zorro Ranch.

National media coverage this week highlighted renewed scrutiny surrounding Epstein’s New Mexico property and whether state agencies and officials failed to properly investigate allegations tied to the ranch for years. The reports have also brought attention to concerns from New Mexico lawmakers that the Truth Commission may not be fully pursuing the scope of its investigation as required under House Resolution 1.

In a recent national television interview, Rep. Stefani Lord (R-Sandia Park) said the commission’s responsibility is clear and cannot be limited to a narrow review.

“This commission has a job, and it’s very simple. They have to follow the evidence wherever it leads. They can’t ignore anything,” Lord said on Newsmax. “They have to make sure that everybody that was involved in Epstein’s world was accountable. He did not operate in a vacuum. There were breakdowns on multiple levels of government.”

“If Jeffrey Epstein moved to New Mexico today, we do not have a state law — we have failed to pass a state law — that would require him to register in our state,” Dow said.

Lord also raised questions about why Epstein was not required to register as a sex offender in New Mexico and whether investigations were delayed or shut down.

“We need to know why was he not a registered sex offender in New Mexico? Were there any investigations delayed or shut down, and did anyone have any influence or connections in this role of why this wasn’t investigated thoroughly?” she said.

The renewed national attention comes as lawmakers formally requested that the Truth Commission expand its investigation beyond individual acts to include systemic failures in government oversight, law enforcement, and policy.

In a formal letter to the commission, Reps. Lord and Rebecca Dow (R-Truth or Consequences – House GOP Caucus Chair) wrote that the investigation must include “institutional, legal, and procedural failures that may have contributed to an environment in which misconduct could persist without sufficient scrutiny or intervention.”

The letter specifically calls for an examination of legislative efforts related to sex offender registration laws, law enforcement and prosecutorial actions or inaction, interagency coordination failures, and whether conflicts of interest or political influence played a role in the lack of action surrounding Epstein’s activities in New Mexico.

In a press release accompanying the request, Rep. Lord said the public deserves answers if people in positions of authority failed to act.

“If those in power had the ability to act and chose not to, the public deserves to know why and whether money or relationships influenced that inaction. This investigation must follow the truth, not protect the powerful,” Lord said.

The press release also emphasized that the Truth Commission was created not just to investigate past wrongdoing, but to identify systemic failures and prevent similar crimes from happening in the future.

Despite the commission’s broad mandate under House Resolution 1 — which includes promoting transparency, protecting vulnerable populations, and ensuring accountability — critics say little visible progress has been made publicly, even as national reports continue to raise new questions about Epstein’s activities in New Mexico and whether opportunities to investigate were missed.

Lawmakers say the stakes go beyond Epstein himself and focus on whether New Mexico’s institutions failed to protect victims and hold powerful individuals accountable.

“The main thing is we cannot allow this to be a surface level investigation,” Lord said in the interview. “They need to go all the way, follow every single lead and make sure that everyone involved is held responsible.”

As national attention grows, pressure is likely to increase on the Truth Commission to show results and demonstrate that its investigation is moving forward — and that New Mexico is willing to fully examine how Epstein was able to operate in the state for years without greater scrutiny.

Watch the Newsmax interview here:

NM makes national news over gaps in Epstein ‘Truth Commission’ probe Read More »

New study ranks the best states for doctors — What about NM?

10 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

As National Doctors’ Day approaches on March 30, a new report from personal finance website WalletHub ranks New Mexico among the worst states in the nation for physicians, highlighting ongoing challenges in attracting and retaining medical professionals in the state.

WalletHub’s 2026 report on the Best and Worst States for Doctors placed New Mexico 45th overall, putting it near the bottom nationally. The rankings evaluated all 50 states and the District of Columbia across 19 key metrics, including physicians’ average annual wages, hospitals per capita, malpractice insurance costs, physician burnout rates, and the quality of each state’s public hospital system.

While family physicians earn an average annual salary of around $238,000 nationwide, the WalletHub study suggests that financial opportunity alone does not determine where doctors choose to practice. Instead, the report found that working conditions, insurance costs, and healthcare infrastructure play a major role in determining which states are most attractive to medical professionals.

According to the report, the top 10 best states for doctors in 2026 are Montana, Indiana, Louisiana, South Dakota, Minnesota, North Dakota, Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa, and Wisconsin. Many of these states ranked highly due to lower malpractice insurance costs, strong hospital systems, and higher average wages when adjusted for cost of living.

By contrast, the worst-performing states were Vermont, Maryland, Oregon, New Mexico, Illinois, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Rhode Island, New Jersey, and New York. New Mexico’s low ranking reflects long-standing issues in the state’s healthcare system, including doctor shortages, rural access challenges, and high malpractice insurance costs, which have been cited by medical professionals as barriers to practicing in the state.

WalletHub analyst Chip Lupo said that where doctors choose to practice can have a major impact not only on their own financial success but also on patient outcomes and access to care.

“Setting up a practice in one of the best states for doctors can have a profound effect on your medical career,” Lupo said. “Not only will you be working in top-quality medical facilities and earning high salaries, you’ll be less likely to burn out, and pay less for malpractice insurance. Meanwhile, residents living in one of the best states for doctors will have access to quality healthcare at a reasonable cost.”

The report also highlighted several key national comparisons. Louisiana has the highest average annual wage for surgeons when adjusted for cost of living—three times higher than in the District of Columbia, which has the lowest. Mississippi has the lowest number of physicians per 1,000 residents, while the District of Columbia has the highest. Nebraska has the lowest annual malpractice liability insurance rates, at more than eight times lower than rates in New York, which are the highest in the country.

New Mexico’s low ranking comes as the state continues to struggle with physician shortages, particularly in rural areas, and as policymakers debate changes to malpractice laws, healthcare funding, and medical education programs aimed at keeping more doctors in the state.

The WalletHub report notes that states with strong hospital systems, lower insurance costs, and better working conditions tend to retain more medical residents and experience lower physician burnout rates—factors that ultimately improve healthcare access for residents.

The full WalletHub report, including methodology and state-by-state rankings, is available on the organization’s website.

New study ranks the best states for doctors — What about NM? Read More »

All the times NM Dems praised alleged sexual predator Cesar Chavez

15 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

For decades, leading New Mexico Democrats have openly celebrated and elevated Cesar Chavez as a civil rights icon—praising his legacy in speeches, social media posts, official resolutions, and public events. But as serious allegations about Chavez’s past, including being a pedophile and rapist, resurface and gain wider attention, those glowing tributes are now drawing renewed scrutiny, including by his second-in-command, Dolores Huerta, who now claims she birthed multiple of his children after he raped her over 60 years ago.

From the governor’s office to members of Congress, party leaders across the state have repeatedly lauded Chavez in unequivocal terms. Below is a comprehensive look at the statements, posts, and actions from prominent New Mexico Democrats who have championed Chavez—raising fresh questions about judgment, accountability, and the narratives they continue to promote:

[CLICK NEXT BUTTON TO GO TO NEXT PAGE]

All the times NM Dems praised alleged sexual predator Cesar Chavez Read More »

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Leftist protesters target Albuquerque icon over alleged ICE discount

26 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

A well-known Albuquerque restaurant has become the center of a growing political flashpoint after a viral TikTok video sparked protests over claims that the establishment offers a discount to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.

The controversy centers on the Frontier Restaurant, a longtime staple located directly across from the University of New Mexico campus. The restaurant, popular with students, locals, and visitors alike, has recently drawn criticism from fringe activist groups after allegations surfaced online that it extends a “military discount” to ICE personnel.

The backlash intensified after a TikTok video from extremist activist account @drlmc—reshared on X by the account @LongTimeHistory—encouraged followers to boycott the restaurant and protest its policies. The video claims that ICE agents frequent the restaurant and use it as a place to coordinate enforcement actions.

“They allow agents to sit inside for hours and plan how to kidnap neighbors,” one protester alleged in the video, without providing evidence. The TikTok post further urged viewers to reconsider patronizing the business, stating, “Choose where to spend your money—don’t be complicit!”

The video also included inflammatory rhetoric targeting ICE agents, with one protester declaring, “ICE are not military, they are federal goons.”

The claims quickly gained traction online, prompting a tiny gaggle of agitators to gather outside the Frontier Restaurant with haphazardly written signs. Protesters held them and chanted slogans criticizing both ICE and businesses perceived to support federal immigration enforcement.

Peter Rimar, Wiki Commons

Supporters of the restaurant argue that the backlash is misplaced and politically motivated. Many point out that businesses routinely serve members of law enforcement and government agencies without incident, and that offering discounts—whether to military, veterans, or other public servants—is a common practice across the country.

“Frontier Restaurant is beloved in New Mexico. Often, the first stop for people flying in. Do not think their business will suffer a bit. If anything, increase it,” wrote Paulette Lucas on X. 

The account @TDog73 added, “I normally don’t speak out for local businesses but the Frontier is now coming under attack by the useless dregs of our society. Who is with me on supporting them like they have never been supported before? Let’s flood their restaurant and laugh in the faces of the perennial losers. See you all on Saturday for lunch.”

“Frontier will now get all my disposable income, finally someone in New Mexico who actually supports the USA!” wrote Mario Avila on X.

The protest comes amid heightened national debate over immigration enforcement and the role of local communities in either supporting or resisting federal actions. Fringe activists have refused to take a somewhat objective approach, calling for ICE’s complete and total destruction, which would cripple public safety for New Mexicans and Americans.

Leftist protesters target Albuquerque icon over alleged ICE discount Read More »

Holloman AFB shooting investigation deepens as officials release new details

4 Comments / New Mexico, News / By

A shooting at Holloman Air Force Base on Tuesday has left one person dead and another injured, according to an official release from the 49th Wing Public Affairs Office.

The incident occurred on March 17 near the base Shoppette, a commonly frequented area for service members and personnel. Authorities confirmed that one individual was pronounced dead at the scene, while another—an active-duty service member assigned to Holloman—sustained injuries and was transported for medical care. Officials report that the injured service member is currently in stable condition.

The deceased has been identified only as a civilian and military veteran who was previously stationed at Holloman Air Force Base. Their identity has not yet been released, pending notification of next of kin. Similarly, the name of the injured service member has not been disclosed due to privacy considerations.

Base officials emphasized that the shooting appears to have been an isolated incident and that there is no ongoing threat to the Holloman community or surrounding areas. Early findings from the investigation say that the shooting was “domestic related, but the individuals were not married.”

“The shooting… resulted in one person injured and another person declared deceased at the scene,” the 49th Wing Public Affairs Office stated in its release. “This was an isolated incident and there is no ongoing threat to our community.”

Authorities have not released further details regarding the circumstances leading up to the shooting, including how the individuals were connected or what may have triggered the incident. The case remains under active investigation.

Officials are also urging the public to refrain from speculation, particularly on social media, as the investigation continues and families are notified.

“We ask that individuals avoid speculating on social media regarding the incident out of respect for the families involved,” the release stated.

The shooting has raised concern among residents and military families in the Alamogordo area, though base leadership has sought to reassure the public that the situation is contained and under control.

Holloman Air Force Base, home to the 49th Wing, plays a critical role in national defense and regularly hosts training operations and personnel from across the country. Incidents of this nature are rare on the installation.

More information is expected to be released as investigators continue to gather facts and piece together a timeline of events.

Holloman AFB shooting investigation deepens as officials release new details Read More »

Tight race looms in NM House District 53 as Luna and Silva face off

10 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

A closely watched legislative contest is shaping up in southern New Mexico, where incumbent Democrat State Rep. Sarah Silva of Las Cruces is seeking re-election against Republican challenger Ben Luna of Chaparral in House District 53. The race is expected to be one of the more competitive contests in the state, following Silva’s narrow 158-vote victory in 2024.

Silva, completing her first term, has centered her campaign on economic stability, public investment, and expanding access to essential services. In a recent campaign video, she highlighted her work leveraging oil and gas revenues to fund housing assistance, universal childcare, and healthcare access. 

“We all deserve the freedom that living in stable, supportive communities provides,” Silva said, emphasizing her focus on strengthening communities amid what she described as uncertainty at the federal level. 

Silva’s campaign has also taken a more aggressive tone as the race heats up. In her video, she criticized Luna as a political newcomer and accused him of spreading misinformation during the previous election cycle, with direct instances not specified.

“The Republican who filed to run against me is a content creator who spread fake news and harmful lies during the 2024 election to try to help Republicans win,” she said. “Folks like that don’t plan on working hard for you or New Mexico, and we can’t let him win.”

Luna, on the other hand, is presenting himself as a grassroots advocate with deep ties to rural communities and a focus on property rights, water access, and economic opportunity. In a recent press release, Luna emphasized his hands-on involvement in assisting local families and ranchers facing regulatory challenges from state and federal agencies.

According to Luna, he has shown up “to help neighbors upon request,” including working with Otero County ranchers Spike and Kelly Goss in disputes with the U.S. Forest Service. He also cited past advocacy alongside Catron County ranchers Kit Laney and Carolyn Nelson in conflicts involving both federal land management and the New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. Additionally, Luna pointed to efforts supporting rancher Arturo Martinez Sandoval in Cibola County regarding land access issues tied to state-controlled properties near the Juan Tafoya Land Grant.

“People in our communities care about jobs, safe neighborhoods, good schools, and keeping our way of life strong,” Luna stated in a recent press release. “Those aren’t partisan issues-they’re New Mexico issues.”

His message has resonated with voters concerned about government overreach, particularly in rural and agricultural communities.

“This campaign isn’t about left versus right. It’s about common sense. It’s about fairness. It’s about putting Doña Ana and Otero families first,” Luna said, adding, “I’m running for one simple reason: I care about our families and the life we’ve built here in Southern New Mexico.”

Luna has also received endorsements from state leaders, such as State Sen. Jay Block (R-Rio Rancho), reinforcing his positioning as a candidate focused on economic development, small business support, and defending traditional industries such as oil and gas.

“Ben Luna has been a strong advocate for the industries that power New Mexico’s economy and the small businesses that depend on them. He has consistently stood with ranchers, farmers, and the oil and gas workforce while defending our constitutional rights. I am proud to endorse Ben Luna Jr. for House District 53,” Sen. Block wrote in a statement.

The race highlights a broader contrast in priorities. Silva is emphasizing continued public investment, social services, and infrastructure development, while Luna is focusing on regulatory reform, individual rights, and support for rural economies.

According to the recent conservative-leaning CPAC rankings, Silva garnered a 28% rating. For comparison, far-left Rep. Angelica Rubio, also of Las Cruces, who is known for her progressive stances, garnered a 29% ranking. On balance, Silva received a 100% score from the progressive Conservation Voters New Mexico ranking for the current legislative session, keeping her 100% progressive lifetime score.

With House District 53, a quite moderate district encompassing a mix of urban and rural communities—including parts of Las Cruces and Chaparral—the outcome may hinge on turnout and which candidate can better connect with voters across those diverse constituencies.

Given the razor-thin margin in the last election and the heightened political environment in 2026, both campaigns are expected to invest heavily in outreach and organization in the months ahead.

Tight race looms in NM House District 53 as Luna and Silva face off Read More »

Toulouse Oliver campaigns off taxpayer-funded lawsuit to hide voter rolls

11 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

New Mexico Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver is facing renewed scrutiny after posting a campaign video on social media Monday in which she openly touted her role in suing the Trump administration—using taxpayer-funded resources—to block federal access to voter data.

In the video, Toulouse Oliver framed the legal battle as a defense of privacy and voting rights, while simultaneously tying the lawsuit to her ongoing campaign for lieutenant governor.

“I’m in a lawsuit against the current administration to make sure your private information, your birth date, your social security number, and your driver’s license number stay private,” Toulouse Oliver said in the video. “We are pushing back against the Trump administration… and as your next lieutenant governor I’m going to bring that fight with me to the fourth floor in Santa Fe.”

She concluded the message with a direct campaign appeal, asking viewers to “help support my campaign so we can continue to fight back.”

The remarks come amid an escalating legal dispute between Toulouse Oliver’s office and the U.S. Department of Justice, which has filed a federal lawsuit accusing her of unlawfully refusing to provide New Mexico’s statewide voter registration list.

As previously reported by Piñon Post, the DOJ’s request is not unusual or unprecedented. Federal law—including the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), and provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1960—requires state election officials to maintain and, upon request, provide records related to federal elections.

The DOJ’s complaint specifically cites federal statute requiring that election records “shall, upon demand in writing… be made available for inspection, reproduction, and copying.” According to federal officials, that includes voter registration data such as names, dates of birth, addresses, and identifying numbers used to verify eligibility.

Importantly, the DOJ has stated that such information is used strictly for election administration and oversight purposes and is protected under federal privacy safeguards. The agency also emphasized that the data requested is explicitly exempt from Privacy Act restrictions when used in this context.

Despite those assurances, Toulouse Oliver refused to comply with the request, arguing that New Mexico law prohibits the release of certain voter information. Federal officials, however, maintain that federal law supersedes conflicting state statutes.

The Justice Department alleges that her refusal constitutes a direct violation of federal election law and undermines efforts to ensure accurate voter rolls and election integrity.

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon stated that states refusing to comply with federal election laws “interfere with our mission of ensuring that Americans have accurate voter lists… and that all voters have confidence in election results.”

Critics argue that Toulouse Oliver’s latest Facebook post reinforces concerns that the lawsuit is being used not only as a legal defense, but also as a political tool. By highlighting the case in campaign messaging and soliciting support, she appears to be leveraging an active, taxpayer-funded legal battle to energize her base ahead of the 2026 election.

Supporters of the Secretary, meanwhile, argue that she is protecting sensitive voter data from unnecessary federal intrusion and standing up for New Mexico’s autonomy in administering elections.

Still, the timing and tone of the video—blending official legal action with campaign rhetoric—raise ethical and political questions about the appropriate use of public resources and the line between governance and campaigning.

If the court ultimately sides with the DOJ, Toulouse Oliver could be compelled to turn over the voter data within days, potentially marking a significant rebuke of her legal position and her broader resistance to federal oversight.

For now, the case continues to unfold, with New Mexico once again at the center of a high-stakes battle over election transparency, federal authority, and the politicization of election administration.

Toulouse Oliver campaigns off taxpayer-funded lawsuit to hide voter rolls Read More »

NM in national spotlight for secretly pushing trans surgery, abortions on kids

13 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

New Mexico is once again drawing national scrutiny as multiple conservative national media outlets highlight policies and practices in the state involving late-term abortion access and gender transition support for minors. Recent investigative reports published by Life News and Townhall portray New Mexico as a national hub for permissive abortion laws and school policies that critics say enable gender transition support and reproductive services for minors without parental involvement.

The reports have sparked renewed outrage over New Mexico’s regulatory framework for abortion and the role of school-based health clinics in providing counseling and referrals related to gender identity and pregnancy.

National spotlight on late-term abortions

In a March 12 report, Life News highlighted an undercover investigation reportedly conducted by the New Mexico Sentinel involving a facility in Albuquerque. According to the report, undercover footage captured conversations with staff discussing the availability of abortions later in pregnancy — including on minors.

A worker at the Valley Abortion Group allegedly told investigators that the clinic performs procedures “up to 34 weeks… so technically there is almost no deadline,” according to the undercover recording cited by LifeSiteNews.

The outlet reported that New Mexico’s abortion policies allow the procedure “at all stages of pregnancy and placing few statewide restrictions on the procedure.” Critics quoted in the article argue that the state has become a destination for abortion seekers traveling from states with stricter laws.

Tara Shaver of Abortion Free New Mexico told the publication the investigation confirms concerns her organization has raised for years.

“New Mexico’s lack of oversight has created a system where abortion businesses can openly market to patients from other states — including vulnerable minors — while operating with minimal regulatory scrutiny,” Shaver said, according to the report.

LifeSiteNews further reported that advocacy groups believe New Mexico is becoming a regional center for what they describe as “abortion tourism,” citing networks that help patients travel to the state for procedures unavailable in their home states.

Schools and health clinics under scrutiny

Meanwhile, a series of reports by Townhall claims that school-based health centers across New Mexico are enabling access to reproductive services and gender identity support for students.

In a March 11 article, Townhall reported that “dozens of New Mexico public schools host in-house health clinics,” which critics say may allow students to seek services without parental knowledge.

According to the outlet, undercover footage allegedly captured a health clinic worker explaining how staff could intervene in a student pregnancy situation.

“I could call her out of class,” the worker reportedly said in a phone conversation regarding a student seeking help with a pregnancy. The article claims that an evaluation would be conducted and the student could then be referred to another provider to discuss pregnancy options.

Townhall also cited a counselor discussing gender transition issues for a young student and acknowledging concerns about medical treatments for minors.

The counselor reportedly said hormone treatments could be difficult to obtain for a young teen because “their brains are still developing” and the drugs “messes up their brain development.”

“Trans mania” allegations in schools

In a separate March 12 article, Townhall continued its investigative series, claiming that “transgender mania has swept schools across New Mexico, including ones that teach children as young as six.”

The report described undercover interactions with school staff discussing gender identity policies and counseling services.

One school counselor allegedly told investigators that a student “could go to whichever restroom she wants,” according to Townhall, while another worker said a student could meet with therapists during the school day.

Another staff member reportedly explained that the school clinic could not provide gender transition treatments directly but could connect students with providers elsewhere.

“Our agreement with APS is that we don’t do that kind of care,” the worker said in the video cited by Townhall, referring to surgeries and drug treatments, before noting that the clinic could refer students to other providers.

WATCH HERE:

Outrage Ensues

The reports have intensified criticism from pro-life organizations and conservative commentators who argue that New Mexico’s policies have turned the state into a national destination for controversial medical services that put women and children in harm’s way.

National coverage has once again placed New Mexico at the center of a contentious national debate over abortions, parental rights, and gender identity policies affecting minors.

NM in national spotlight for secretly pushing trans surgery, abortions on kids Read More »

1 2 3 4 5 6 … 100
Scroll to Top