Saturday’s Democrat gubernatorial “debate” looked less like a serious forum for voters and more like a carefully curated progressive showcase — complete with activist-selected questions, audience participation gimmicks, and even a pre-debate game show format.
Former Interior Secretary Deb Haaland and Bernalillo County District Attorney Sam Bregman took the stage at Central New Mexico Community College for what organizers branded “The Debate Games,” the only scheduled faceoff between the two Democrats before the June 2 primary. But unlike the recent Republican gubernatorial debate aired by KOAT-TV, Saturday’s event was not a traditional journalist-moderated debate focused on broad voter concerns.
Instead, the event was organized by the left-wing nonprofit Dukes Up and featured questions sourced from progressive activist organizations including the American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico, Indivisible Albuquerque, Jewish Voice for Peace, and the Center for Biological Diversity, among others.
According to New Mexico PBS, the event also included a system where audience members waved flags to determine whether candidates had answered questions sufficiently — with candidates losing speaking time if the crowd disapproved.
Even Bregman, who had spent months demanding Haaland debate him, admitted afterward that the event was no real debate.
“It wasn’t a debate,” Bregman told reporters, criticizing the format as overly narrow and saying the audience and question pool did not reflect a true cross-section of New Mexico voters, according to the Santa Fe New Mexican and Source New Mexico.
“This is actually special interest groups asking questions,” Bregman said before the event. “I don’t think anybody should be fooled into thinking that this is a real debate, because it simply is not,” he added, per the Santa Fe New Mexican.
Despite their occasional differences in tone, the two Democrats were largely aligned on core policy issues throughout the evening.
Both candidates blasted President Donald Trump and vowed to oppose federal immigration enforcement efforts. Haaland declared the country is in a “break-glass moment” and accused Trump of “wreaking havoc” on New Mexico, according to Source New Mexico. Bregman similarly pledged to confront immigration agents he says violate constitutional rights.
On economic issues, both candidates embraced expanded tax credits and further government intervention to address affordability. Both also backed continuation of New Mexico’s universal child care program.
Where the candidates diverged most noticeably was on energy and environmental issues.
Haaland took a hardline stance against major data center projects like Project Jupiter in Doña Ana County, saying, “I just believe very strongly that data centers don’t have the best interests of our community at heart,” according to Source New Mexico.
Bregman, by contrast, struck a more measured tone, saying data centers “if done right” could benefit communities and bring substantial construction jobs.
The candidates also split over produced water reuse from oil and gas operations. Haaland opposed broader reuse, saying “the science is still out” and warning the water could be dangerous if released into the environment. Bregman appeared more open to treated reuse, likening it to recycled wastewater used in parks and golf courses.
On the proposed Blackstone takeover of PNM Resources, Haaland sharply attacked private equity, saying such firms are accountable to “their shareholders, not the community, not New Mexicans,” while Bregman said the utility may need outside capital but insisted any deal must include protections against rate hikes.
Throughout the event, however, little direct confrontation occurred between the candidates, with both mostly using their time to tout their own records and “progressive” credentials rather than meaningfully sparring.
The event ended with the audience chanting “Deb, Deb, Deb!” — underscoring what many observers noted was a heavily pro-Haaland atmosphere.
With Haaland already leading comfortably in polling, Saturday’s so-called “Debate Games” did little to resemble the kind of substantive, broadly focused debate voters typically expect in a gubernatorial race.
Instead, it served primarily as a progressive policy showcase — and one that even one of the participants declined to call a real debate.The “debate” will air Thursday on New Mexico PBS’ YouTube channel at 7:00 p.m.

Haaland is a Pos.
Sounds like the Dems have ‘selected’ their candidate…Deb, Deb, Deb.
Even Bregman realized this was not a debate.
Our only hope is if the Trump DOJ can get a hold of the voter rolls and clean them out before the Dem’s selection takes office.
God help us!
It will never happen. Maggie Tolouse Oliver will go to her grave clutching the voter rolls in her fingers.
The Dems will do anything and everything to protect Deb Haaland. They know she isn’t capable of participating in a real debate and she isn’t capable of running our state. She would just be a placeholder for the progressives (George and Alex Soros) to be running things.
The Bregman/Haaland debate was Cowboys and Indians.
Haaland is the DEI Biden.
It was a woke game show. The participants were the best that the Democratic Party has to offer and their best substance was to bash Trump, increase universal child care, more government subsidies at taxpayers expense.
No potential economic growth for NM. No real plans to keep our brightest minds in NM. Just more socialist policies that we now see in the blue state.
What a joke on the audience if they fell for this reckless rhetoric.
God help us.
Some pretty harsh comments but sadly, they are correct. We need to win back the governorship and get all registered Republicans to the polls. If Deb becomes our next governor, our state will only slide deeper into the democrat pit of despair and government dependance.
Soros has chosen his governor of New Mexico. Right wing voters will unknowingly be voting for the drunk bitty.
You 2 lovers go ahead and show your colors so voters can see how disgusting and how out of touch with New Mexico you really are!!
Both of these idiots are far left hate TRUMP love criminals morons. If it wasn’t for those two issues they haven’t got squat. Their rhetoric is nothing more than hate for anything TRUMP. If they actually had political leaders that where good for NEW MEXICO……….hell I’d vote for them. It never ceases to amaze me the dumbasses they actually put in office in this state. mlg and tk are perfect examples of pure stupid in office. It wouldn’t surprise me if they elect the Epstein loving pos holland for governor. That’s my prediction………..I hope for NEW MEXICOS sake I’m wrong.
Whoever wins the R nomination needs to swift boat Haaland over Epstein and her general incompetence, but with hard hitting ads not the soft, weak ones being run now.
Absolute clown show. The difference between the two…….none! If either one is the next governor and fatty Maggie is the next Lt. gov. NM will never recover. Heaven help us.
deb will be a guest on sesame street soon…the first bastion of propoganda that todays left grew up on.
Your choice is Bregman or Haaland PERIOD! Trump has not penetrated through the stranglehold the democrats have legitimate or not. Choose people, Bregman has to win the primary and we will get to the general after that. I have changed to independent voter so should all of you!
Bregman is a classic show pony with wardrobe advice….sorry dude..you aint a cowboy and richardson was not a native from his stringtie days…ltets see his hs photo. Being a hypocrite is a main part of being a politician…especially a dem.