Enviro-Marxists push for a 500% increase in ‘zero-emission’ cars in NM

A group of fringe enviro-Marxist groups, including the Sierra Club, Conservation Voters New Mexico, the Center for Civic Policy, Southwest Energy Efficiency Project, and others are demanding that the State of New Mexico enact stricter standards mandating that car manufacturers supply New Mexico dealers with a 500% increase in “zero-emission cars such as battery-driven vehicles and low-emission cars such as plug-in hybrids,” reports the Santa Fe New Mexican.

The coalition of extremist eco-left groups claims the move “will help tackle the climate crisis” and build “a clean car infrastructure in the state.”  

According to Tammy Fiebelkorn of the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project, embattled Democrat Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham is supportive of the stricter standards. The standards also include those “pertain[ing] to tailpipe and other emissions from vehicles.” 

The Alliance for Automotive Innovation told the New Mexican that battery-electric and plug-in hybrid cars made up about one percent of the New Mexico market in 2020. According to the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project, the increase that the policy, if enacted, would be at least six percent of new vehicle sales being plug-in hybrid and battery-powered electric cars by 2026 — a 500% increase.

“Adopting this rule would make more plug-in vehicles available in New Mexico, which would make it easier for consumers to buy them and increase market share,” said Travis Madsen, the transportation program director for Southwest Energy Efficiency.

But many contend that the use of electric vehicles is even less “green” because regardless of the car not directly using fossil fuels, it is still being charged by power supplied from fossil fuels, and thus its supposed purpose is defeated. 

Also, electric vehicles have extremely short ranges, from 226 to 258 miles per charge, meaning many people in rural New Mexico who must drive long distances for work or even just to get supplies from the next closest town cannot viably use an electric car. 

The lack of range mixed with the extremely high cost of electric vehicles, slow charging times, constant replacement of batteries (not “green” at all), and subpar performance, the push from these enviro-Marxist groups to force “zero-emission” cars into New Mexico’s economy appears hollow and only targeted to a select few city dwellers who can afford the inconvenience and price of such a vehicle. Also, it is impossible to have “zero-emission” vehicles because of the power needed to charge them that can only come from reliable fossil fuels. 

The push for these unreliable vehicles comes after Democrats in the Legislature pushed for a 20-cent gas tax on the poor through fuel emissions standards for energy producers, although it was defeated after it did not make it past its last vote in the House of Representatives .

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Enviro-Marxists push for a 500% increase in ‘zero-emission’ cars in NM”

  1. Oh the logic! Electric cars increase the need for more electricity. More electricity means more power plants. More power plants mean more nuclear waste and where are you going to put that? Those called to serve the people who elect them are doing what they have been doing for decades. Plugging their ears and doing their own will, not the will of the people.

    Per Searchlight New Mexico: February 3, 2021
    New Mexico’s Nuclear Rush, https://searchlightnm.org/new-mexicos-nuclear-rush/
    ” A long-planned nuclear waste storage facility in the southeastern New Mexico desert was rushed through the approval process during the pandemic, according to New Mexico’s congressional delegation, environmentalists and other opponents.
    Typically, project foes would have been able to voice their disapproval at Nuclear Regulatory Commission hearings around the state. The coronavirus brought an end to such public gatherings, however, so New Mexico lawmakers asked the NRC to pause the hearings.
    Instead, the agency switched to online meetings — and shut out dissenters in the process.”
    …”Democratic Congresswoman Deb Haaland, the Secretary of the Interior nominee, opposes the Holtec plan for health, safety and economic reasons. Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, more than a dozen state legislators and the Democrats in New Mexico’s congressional delegation are against it. The Navajo Nation, the All Pueblo Council of Governors and numerous local governments — representing nearly half the population of New Mexico — also object, citing potential risks to families, communities, agriculture, industry and the environment, now and forever. Some of the waste can remain radioactive for more than 1 million years.”

    Don’t get your cart before the horse! Especially when it’s filled Agenda 3030 Horse ****

  2. France has thousands of electric cars sitting idle. And the reason:? They cannot afford the lithium battery to put them back on the streets!!! THINK PEOPLE! Only the privileged will be able to drive and the Sierra members think they are going to be those with this privilege? LMAO!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!

  3. Every time a liberal proposes a solution, not only don’t they work but they make things worse. The problem is they don’t have any practical experience in living. They probably have never changed a flat tire or changed their own oil.

    They just don’t know how real things actually work. So sad. They get elected by promising things that can never be delivered and then when in office they use draconian regulations for all of us “little people.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top