Politics

NM Senate Judiciary chairman smears ICE agents as modern-day Klansmen

17 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

During a Tuesday meeting of the Legislative Courts, Corrections, and Justice Committee, state Sen. Joseph Cervantes (D-Las Cruces), chairman of the committee, compared federal immigration enforcement to the Ku Klux Klan. Cervantes chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee during the regular session.

The Ku Klux Klan, founded after the Civil War, is notorious as a violent white supremacist organization that lynched Black Americans and their allies, terrorized communities with cross burnings, and is widely recognized as the nation’s first terrorist group. Its bloody history of racial hatred and political violence is well documented.

In stark contrast, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents are federal law enforcement officers tasked with carrying out immigration laws passed by Congress and upheld by the courts. Many ICE agents now conceal their identities in public because of doxxing campaigns, harassment, and threats targeting both them and their families. Just last month, DHS reported that in San Francisco, ICE agents and their families were credibly threatened. It has not been reported that any Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers have covered their faces in New Mexico, although it is probably advisable, given the hostile legislative makeup of the state, which now equates them to the KKK. 

The committee’s agenda included a presentation titled “Enforcing Immigration and Civil Liberties — State and Local Government Roles and Risks.” Speakers were primarily from organizations that advocate for illegal immigrants, including Somos Un Pueblo Unido and the New Mexico Immigrant Law Center. An attorney from the New Mexico Association of Counties also spoke about potential county liability, and State Ethics Commission Director Jeremy Farris discussed a lawsuit his agency filed against the New Mexico Department of Corrections. That suit alleges the department shared information with ICE about three individuals — one with a single DWI charge, another with three DWIs, and a third with three counts of battery on a police officer.

At one point, a representative of the pro-illegal immigrant groups claimed that children were being “taken in the night” and deported despite supposed exemptions. Left unsaid was that many of these children were sent north by parents who abandoned them to human traffickers and cartels. Countless minors endure abuse — including sexual violence — while being smuggled into the United States.

Committee Democrats also expressed outrage that Curry County’s sheriff had signed an agreement with the federal government to serve warrants. Vice Chair Christine Chandler (D-Los Alamos), an attorney, declared: “I think it’s not right that we’re using state or public funds to be supporting these kinds of activities. I’m proud of how we, in the Legislature, have been responding to this assault on individuals who are in this country, many of them, most of them are not criminals. We know that to be the case—young people who are attempting… who are put on ICE airplanes in the middle of the night. Children who are returning to their countries are not criminals. And it’s a lie to try to posture in those ways. We are protecting the disenfranchised, and I’m very proud of that, and if we can find other ways to make sure that happens, I think we should be working on that.”

But the most incendiary comments came from Cervantes himself. Closing out the discussion, he said: “When children are being put on planes and people are being taken in the night and people are raiding mobile home parks and they are doing it with masks and, you know, something we haven’t seen since the KKK days, right? And so we’re in a place that we don’t want to be going.” Cervantes then vowed to fight deportations with lawsuits. Notably, Cervantes is a trial attorney himself.

By equating federal law enforcement officers upholding U.S. immigration law to one of America’s most violent hate groups, Cervantes revealed the extreme partisan lens through which New Mexico Democrats are approaching immigration policy — a position that undermines both public safety and respect for the rule of law.

NM Senate Judiciary chairman smears ICE agents as modern-day Klansmen Read More »

NM’s congressional Dems shut down the government to protest Trump

19 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Far-left Democrat Congressman Gabe Vasquez of New Mexico once again proved he cannot be trusted to take a stand for his constituents, casting no vote on the Republican continuing resolution to keep the federal government open. By refusing to vote yes or no, Vasquez avoided accountability while effectively siding with his party’s radical base, leaving Border Patrol agents, military personnel, and veterans’ care hanging in the balance.

The continuing resolution would have ensured government funding through November, guaranteeing paychecks for those serving on the frontlines of the border crisis. With cartels flooding New Mexico’s southern border with drugs and human trafficking, Border Patrol agents risk their lives every day to protect American communities. A real representative of southern New Mexico would stand firmly for them. Instead, Vasquez ducked the issue entirely, choosing political games over duty. His “present” vote was no better than voting against funding, because it refused to support keeping the government open and protecting critical pay and services.

In his carefully worded press release, Vasquez tried to distract from his non-vote by claiming the Republican bill would “skyrocket health care costs, force rural hospitals to close, and take health care away from New Mexicans.” But these scare tactics have little to do with the actual vote. The bill was about keeping the lights on in government and ensuring Border Patrol, the military, and veterans received the pay and services they’ve earned. Instead of standing up for New Mexico’s frontline communities, Vasquez punted.

The National Republican Congressional Committee blasted Vasquez’s maneuver, saying he put politics before New Mexicans in a cynical attempt to appease the radical fringe of his party. “Out of touch Democrat Gabe Vasquez voted to risk veterans’ care, military pay, and public safety just to appease his radical base,” said NRCC spokesman Reilly Richardson. In New Mexico’s Second District, where border security is not an abstraction but a daily crisis, this abdication of responsibility is especially glaring.

Vasquez’s Democrat colleagues Melanie Stansbury and Teresa Leger Fernández also voted no, meaning New Mexico’s entire Democratic delegation failed to back a bill to keep the government open. Rather than taking a stand, they either hid from the issue or actively avoided being counted.

Vasquez later claimed he was “eager to work with Republicans on a budget that addresses the real needs of Americans,” but his refusal to cast a real vote shows otherwise. When the time came to ensure Border Patrol agents and service members got their paychecks, Vasquez stood aside.

In another measure honoring the life of Charlie Kirk, Vasquez voted “present” while Stansbury and Leger Fernandez didn’t even vote — a big statement after Kirk’s assassination.

New Mexicans deserve better than evasions and partisan theater. They deserve a representative who will take a stand when it matters most. Gabe Vasquez chose to sit on the fence, and by doing so, he failed the people of New Mexico.

A previous version of this article incorrectly noted that Vasquez, Stansbury, and Leger Fernandez voted differently on this measure.

NM’s congressional Dems shut down the government to protest Trump Read More »

‘Dirty sewer rat’: Speaker Martínez goes on rage-filled ran after Kirk killing

14 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Far-left New Mexico House Speaker Javier Martínez (D-Albuquerque) unleashed an unhinged and profanity-laced Facebook post on the very day conservative leader Charlie Kirk was assassinated at a Utah college campus, raising outrage across the state. Rather than show restraint or call for calm, Martínez chose the moment to attack conservatives, insult Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem as “ICE Barbie,” and demean nearly half of New Mexico voters.

Martínez wrote in part:

“Second, read a g*ddamn book. Although, can she read? Doubtful.
… if you hate my people and/or enable that dirty sewer rat in the White House, go kick a rock. (With all due respect to sewer rats).
… (Yes, this immigrant is the Speaker of the NM House. Choke on that, haters).
… I might be my ancestors’ wildest dream, but I’m also a fascist’s worst nightmare. Bring it.”

The Speaker’s crude tirade, posted from his official Facebook page, shocked many New Mexicans for both its content and its timing. Conservatives noted the hypocrisy: if a Republican leader had smeared Democrats as “rats” or told half the state to “kick a rock” on the same day of a political assassination, calls for resignation would be deafening.

Rep. Rod Montoya (R-Farmington) issued a blistering response, accusing Martínez of abandoning his duty to represent all New Mexicans:

“First off, Mr. Speaker, you represent the state of New Mexico. I would hope that the citizens of New Mexico are your people. But that is not what you seem to be saying here… you’ve just told 47 percent of the people in New Mexico who voted for President Trump to go kick a rock. Mr. Speaker, your job is to represent all of New Mexico. Apparently, your goal is to represent Mexico.”

Montoya also called out Martínez’s misuse of the word “fascist,” noting that the actual silencing of speech and violent attacks are overwhelmingly coming from the political left:

“A fascist is somebody like the person who had to shut Charlie Kirk’s mouth up permanently with an assassin’s bullet. That’s not happening on the right. That’s happening on the left. The cancel culture and all of these school shootings that have been taking place over the last several years are all coming from people on the left who hate traditional Americans, and Mr. Speaker, it doesn’t appear you have any use for traditional Americans either.”

The Speaker’s sign-off — “Bring it” — drew further concern. Montoya warned that it could be taken as an endorsement of further anarchy and civil unrest rather than debate.

For many, the episode highlighted Martínez’s radical priorities. Instead of condemning violence or showing unity, he doubled down on insults, profanity, and division. And while Democrats in New Mexico have so far stayed silent, critics argue the Speaker’s words reveal the contempt many in his party hold for traditional Americans.

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s tragic assassination, the contrast could not be starker: while conservatives called for peace and accountability, the highest-ranking Democrat in the New Mexico House chose to mock, sneer, and provoke.

‘Dirty sewer rat’: Speaker Martínez goes on rage-filled ran after Kirk killing Read More »

National backlash erupts after NM doctor says Charlie Kirk ‘deserved’ to die

47 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

In the wake of the assassination of Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, a doctor in Albuquerque has drawn national attention and condemnation for social media posts in which he appeared to celebrate the violence.

Dr. John R. Vigil, identified in his public profile as board-certified in Addiction Medicine (not Virgil), a Fellow of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, a Master Addiction Counselor, and associated with the University of New Mexico School of Medicine and JRV Medical Group, posted two messages on Facebook following Kirk’s death. 

In one, he reportedly wrote: “If you’re looking for sympathy from me over the death of a MAGAt, it’s between sh*t and syphilis in the dictionary!” In a second post, he said, “I’ll probably lose friends over this, but besides Trump, I can’t think of a more deserving person to get just Karma!”

Those posts, first shared widely by online commentator Cam Higby of Today is America via X (formerly Twitter), included accusations that Vigil said Kirk deserved to die and called the killing just. According to those who shared the posts, Vigil is a managing partner at JRV Medical Group in Albuquerque. 

Reaction and Broader Context

The posts prompted swift backlash. Some commentators say they amount to glorification of political violence. On social media, prominent figures noticed; among them, Elon Musk replied to one of the posts with “!!” — a brief response that drew attention but has not been further elaborated. 

The controversy arises amid heightened national scrutiny over the assassination of Charlie Kirk, which is being widely treated as a political killing. Kirk was shot while speaking at Utah Valley University, and the event has triggered intense conversation about political violence, free speech, and extremism in the United States.

Credentials and Roles of Dr. Vigil

Dr. Vigil’s social media profile and public listings describe him as:

  • Board-certified in Addiction Medicine,
  • Fellow of the American Society of Addiction Medicine,
  • Master Addiction Counselor,
  • Author,
  • Affiliated with JRV Medical Group, and
  • Affiliated with the University of New Mexico School of Medicine in Albuquerque.

These credentials add weight to the public reaction, as they suggest Vigil operates in roles that involve public trust and professional responsibility.

What Is Confirmed, What Is Not

  • Confirmed: The posts attributed to Vigil, as shown via screenshots and social media shares, contain the quoted language. Multiple sources have made the association between those posts and Vigil’s professional identity. 
  • Not Confirmed / Unclear: There is no public statement yet from Vigil confirming authorship or context beyond what has been shared. It is likewise unclear whether there has been any formal action by his employer, by the University of New Mexico, or by medical licensing boards. There is no record yet (at least in widely circulated national reporting) of institutional investigations.

Potential Consequences and Ethical Dimensions

Such comments from a medical professional raise ethical and political questions. Physicians are generally expected, under professional codes and licensing regulations, to adhere to standards of conduct both inside and outside the clinic, especially when public statements might affect patient trust or public reputation. In some states, professional conduct rules permit investigation into off-duty speech if it reflects adversely on the ability to practice or violates laws (including hate speech, incitement, or threats).

If Vigil’s employer or the UNM School of Medicine becomes involved, possible responses could range from public censure, suspension, or review by a medical board—though action depends on state licensing laws and internal institutional policies.

Looking Ahead

At this time, no formal institutional discipline has been confirmed. It remains to be seen whether Dr. Vigil will issue a public apology, clarification, or retraction. Public reaction continues to simmer, with some calling for consequences and others defending free speech—even harsh speech—in politically charged times.

National backlash erupts after NM doctor says Charlie Kirk ‘deserved’ to die Read More »

New Mexicans react with anger, grief after Charlie Kirk assassination

15 Comments / National, New Mexico, News, Politics / By

New Mexico leaders reacted with grief, shock, and an urgent call for greater political civility on Wednesday and Thursday after Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA and a prominent conservative activist, was fatally shot during a university event in Utah. The attack occurred at Utah Valley University in Orem on Sept. 10, just as Kirk was addressing students, and authorities say the shooter remains at large. 

The Shooting & Manhunt

Around 12:20 p.m. local time, Kirk was speaking under a tent in a campus courtyard as part of the “American Comeback Tour.” He had just responded to a question about mass shootings when a single bullet struck him in the neck. Witnesses described chaos immediately following the gunfire: Kirk fell, blood was visible, the crowd ducked and fled. 

Law enforcement officials are analyzing closed-circuit camera footage from campus showing a person “dressed in all dark clothing,” possibly fleeing the scene. The shot appears to have been fired from the roof of a building approximately 200 yards away from where Kirk spoke. 

Multiple individuals were briefly detained, including one man initially arrested on obstruction charges, and a second person interviewed, but neither has been confirmed as the shooter. The Utah Department of Public Safety, the FBI, the Utah County Attorney’s office, the Sheriff’s Office, and local police are co-leading the investigation. 

Reactions from Across New Mexico

New Mexicans of different political backgrounds issued strong statements condemning violence and urging reflection.

State Rep. Stefani Lord (R-Sandia Park) said:

“If you celebrate the murder of a man simply because you disagreed with him, you are part of the problem, part of the poison dividing this country.
When people cheer this kind of violence, or casually throw around words like ‘Nazi’ or ‘fascist,’ they reveal what they truly want: not debate, not dialogue, but for our death.
We can stand firm in our beliefs without losing our humanity. I choose to stand for life, dignity, and truth, even when it costs me.”

Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-NM) called the shooting “tragic and grossly un-American.” She urged all Americans to prefer “respect and dialogue over hate and violence.” 

Republican Party of New Mexico issued a remembrance honoring Kirk as “a devoted family man, a passionate defender of faith and freedom” and said his assassination was an attack on “the very principles of free speech and civil discourse.” It called for citizens to engage respectfully across political divides.

Democratic Party of New Mexico, while similarly condemning the killing and the rise in political violence, also attempted to highlight broader concerns such as gun violence and extremism, arguing that the atmosphere that allows such acts to occur is worsening.

State Rep. John Block (R-Alamogordo) prayed for Kirk’s entrance into Heaven, peace for the family, justice in the case, and warned of “evil prowling among us every day seeking to scare us — even murder us — but we must not let the devil win.”

NM House Minority Leader Gail Armstrong (R-Magdalena) said she was “outraged and heartbroken,” emphasizing that “words matter” and condemning reckless rhetoric that poisons the political climate. She urged accountability for the shooter and called for leaders of all parties to condemn violence and lower the temperature in public discourse.

Local Impact

In New Mexico, Kirk had recently visited Albuquerque for “Freedom Night in America,” drawing thousands to a church event. 

Radicalized far-left protesters also attacked Kirk’s event at the University of New Mexico in 2022.

Supporters in Portales, where Eastern New Mexico University has a Turning Point USA chapter, expressed heartbreak and shock, saying they share values with Kirk and felt the killing was unjust and chilling. 

National Context and What’s Next

Reaction across the U.S. has been swift and bipartisan. Political leaders from both parties, former and current, condemned the act as an assault on democratic norms. Meanwhile, investigators have not yet announced a suspect or motive, but believe the act was targeted. The public has been asked for any photographs or videos that could help. 

For many New Mexicans, the assassination of Charlie Kirk is not just another headline; it’s a painful reminder of how divisive rhetoric and political polarization may pave the way to violence. Leaders across the political spectrum are calling for reflection, restraint, and a renewed commitment to civil discourse as the state—and the nation—grapples with how to prevent such tragedies.

New Mexicans react with anger, grief after Charlie Kirk assassination Read More »

AG Torrez cries ‘racism’ after SCOTUS backs DHS crackdown on illegals

19 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez lashed out Monday at the U.S. Supreme Court for granting the Department of Homeland Security and the Trump Administration authority to continue critical immigration enforcement operations in Los Angeles. In reality, the Court’s action did nothing more than restore the long-standing ability of federal officers to do their jobs while a lawsuit continues in the lower courts.

In a 6–3 decision, the justices stayed a sweeping injunction issued in July by U.S. District Judge Maame Frimpong that had barred ICE agents from considering obvious factors when determining whether someone might be in the country illegally. That order, cheered by activist groups, effectively handcuffed federal law enforcement by forbidding them from looking at context such as location, type of work, language, or appearance when making quick field decisions.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and the Trump Administration appealed, arguing the injunction dangerously tied the hands of immigration officers at a time when illegal crossings and criminal alien activity are overwhelming communities. The Ninth Circuit had upheld Frimpong’s restrictions, but the Supreme Court intervened, restoring federal authority until the case can be fully argued. A district-court hearing on the plaintiffs’ preliminary injunction request is scheduled for September 24.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, concurring with the majority, underscored that officers must still follow the Constitution by relying on “reasonable suspicion” under the totality of the circumstances — the same standard courts have recognized for decades. What the Court rejected was the idea that officers must blind themselves to reality. It is common sense that language, location, and certain behaviors can factor into suspicion when combined with other evidence.

Torrez, however, responded with dramatic claims that the Court’s decision “allows federal agents to continue to stop and detain people because of their skin color, the language they speak, and the work that they do.” That rhetoric badly misrepresents what the Court did. No justice endorsed racial profiling. The justices simply recognized that ICE agents must retain the discretion to act in high-risk environments without fear that every judgment call will be second-guessed by activist courts.

The facts bear repeating: immigration enforcement operations in Los Angeles were targeting day-labor pickup sites where agents had documented a high concentration of illegal entrants, including individuals with criminal records. Critics of the raids, including the ACLU, want the courts to effectively prevent agents from acting in those contexts. The Supreme Court, by contrast, affirmed that DHS cannot be stripped of its basic enforcement tools while the litigation plays out.

Torrez’s broadside is not about protecting citizens — citizens have nothing to fear if they are law-abiding and carry identification. His outrage is about scoring political points by echoing activist talking points that conflate lawful immigration enforcement with racism. It is telling that he framed the Court’s ruling as an “insult to New Mexicans,” when in truth it simply preserves federal agents’ ability to apprehend criminal aliens before they endanger communities.

The bottom line of the Court’s action is simple: DHS must have the authority to enforce immigration law, and the Supreme Court ensured that authority remains intact. Torrez’s mischaracterization only sows fear and confusion, while Sec. Noem and the Trump Administration have taken the responsible position of defending the tools officers need to protect the public.

AG Torrez cries ‘racism’ after SCOTUS backs DHS crackdown on illegals Read More »

MLG plans to massively expand expensive socialist ‘free’ program

24 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Starting November 1, Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham plans to make New Mexico the first state in the nation to provide no-cost child care to every family, regardless of income. That means even millionaires’ children will be entitled to “free” (taxpayer-funded) daycare — all at the expense of hardworking taxpayers.

At a press conference in Santa Fe, the governor boasted that so-called “universal child care” is the “backbone” of her plan to support families. “There are so many people across the country that say [universal child care is] impossible — not impossible,” Lujan Grisham said, adding that she believes subsidizing care for all families will “lift New Mexico out of poverty.”

But the plan comes with an enormous price tag. New Mexico’s Early Childhood Education and Care Department already spends $463 million annually on subsidies. Expanding the program statewide will require at least another $120 million every year — pushing the total tab toward $600 million in recurring spending. The governor says she will ask lawmakers during the upcoming 30-day session to cover the shortfall.

Currently, families earning up to 400% of the federal poverty level — roughly $106,600 for a family of three — already qualify for free care. The new rule removes those limits entirely, opening the program to every household, regardless of wealth. “This amounts to an average annual family savings of $12,000 per child,” the governor’s office admitted in a release, underscoring just how much taxpayers are expected to shoulder for families who could easily afford care on their own.

Critics are warning of the consequences. Sen. George Muñoz (D-Gallup), chair of the powerful Senate Finance Committee, questioned how the governor expects to sustain such massive recurring costs. “I don’t know how they’re going to explain that to people when they don’t have the money to pay for everyone’s child care,” Muñoz said.

The Legislative Finance Committee has also cautioned that expanding eligibility disproportionately benefits higher-income families, leaving fewer resources for low-income, at-risk children. House Republicans have blasted the program as “nannies for millionaires,” writing:

“New Mexico already provides free child care for families up to 400% of the federal poverty level. Now Democrats want taxpayers to subsidize childcare for the wealthy, while ignoring real emergencies like our doctor shortage, failing CYFD, and rising crime. Gov. Lujan Grisham is out of touch with what New Mexico families are actually facing.”

Despite these warnings, the governor brushed aside concerns, claiming wealthy families won’t really use the program. “They’re not going to use this system by and large, so why develop a system that works just in that way?” she said, according to the Santa Fe New Mexican report by Daniel Chacón. Yet her own administration admits the plan will add thousands of new slots — and demands more construction spending to build facilities to handle the expansion.

In total, the governor’s “universal” scheme represents a quarter-billion-dollar hike in taxpayer obligations, with no guardrails to prevent subsidizing the childcare of the rich. Meanwhile, pressing crises like New Mexico’s failing child welfare agency, doctor shortages, and rising crime continue to go unaddressed.

For Lujan Grisham, though, “universal” means everyone — even millionaires’ kids. For New Mexicans, it means a bigger bullseye on their paychecks to cover the growing cost of government handouts.

MLG plans to massively expand expensive socialist ‘free’ program Read More »

NM’s woke senators whine about illegal aliens being deported

30 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

New Mexico’s two Democrat U.S. Senators, Martin Heinrich and Ben Ray Luján, are once again prioritizing illegal immigrants over American citizens. This time, they’ve joined more than 40 Senate Democrats in demanding that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem walk back a commonsense statement from her department acknowledging that Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients are not automatically protected from deportation.

DACA, created by the Obama administration in 2012, shields certain illegal immigrants—often called “Dreamers”—from deportation on a renewable two-year basis. These individuals entered the U.S. unlawfully but have been granted special privileges under the program, including work authorization.

The controversy began after DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin made the obvious point: “Illegal aliens who claim to be recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) are not automatically protected from deportation.” Heinrich, Luján, and their fellow Democrats rushed to attack the statement, insisting that deporting DACA recipients would violate the intent of the program.

In their letter to Secretary Noem, Heinrich and Luján claimed, “DACA was created to provide protections from immigration enforcement for certain noncitizens brought to the United States as children, also known as Dreamers.” They further demanded that DHS “correct” McLaughlin’s remarks and abide by DACA protections moving forward.

The letter also lamented recent enforcement actions against DACA holders, including the detention of one individual in New Mexico. Democrats argued that such actions “disrupt families, harm communities, and inflict unnecessary social, emotional, and economic costs”.

What the Democrats ignore is that Congress never passed DACA and that it remains an unconstitutional executive action. Even the courts have repeatedly limited or questioned its legality. Yet Heinrich and Luján are pushing to expand protections for those who entered the country illegally while New Mexico families struggle with crime, poverty, and a broken health care system.

This is not the first time New Mexico’s senators have sided with illegal aliens over their own constituents. Earlier this year, Heinrich introduced legislation to shield DACA recipients’ personal information, and both senators signed on to efforts urging the Biden administration to reopen new applications despite ongoing court challenges.

Instead of addressing border security or the crisis of fentanyl and human trafficking pouring across New Mexico’s southern border, Heinrich and Luján are once again “crowing” about protecting people who broke America’s laws.

NM’s woke senators whine about illegal aliens being deported Read More »

Sen. Luján melts down in hearing, wags ‘starfish pin’ at HHS Secretary Kennedy

30 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

What was supposed to be a serious Senate Finance Committee hearing on Thursday spiraled into political theater when Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), a live-action role player (LARPer) of a U.S. senator, repeatedly badgered Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., at one point holding up a novelty starfish pin and declaring the secretary “unworthy” of it.

Luján opened his questioning by accusing Kennedy of ignoring expert advice, citing the resignation letter of Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, a former CDC director. When Kennedy answered that he was regularly briefed, naming Dr. William Thompson, Luján dismissed the reply and pressed for more, berating the secretary as evasive, while unhinged, claiming Kennedy couldn’t understand Luján’s “New Mexico accent.”

The senator then fixated on a contractor, David Geyer, claiming he was secretly conducting a government autism study despite Kennedy’s clear denial. Kennedy explained that Geyer was a contractor with limited access to federal data, but Luján insisted otherwise, throwing accusations and dredging up unrelated past legal disputes. “Do you know who works for you, Mr. Kennedy?” Luján peformatively sneered before repeatedly interrupting Kennedy’s attempts to give him an answer.

The exchange reached peak absurdity when Luján waved a starfish pin he said had been given to him at a town hall in Las Cruces. In a dramatic scolding, he told Kennedy: “I was going to give it to you today, but after your questioning today, I don’t think you deserve it.” Luján went on to lecture Kennedy with a children’s parable about tossing stranded starfish back into the ocean, before concluding, “I’m sorry that you’re not worthy of this nice little pin … today was a failure for you, man.”

Kennedy, visibly frustrated after being repeatedly cut off, accused Luján of “showboating” for the cameras. The back-and-forth left the New Mexico Democrat looking more interested in theatrics than substance, with his condescending tone and props drawing raised eyebrows even from colleagues.

Instead of pressing for answers, Luján’s tirade devolved into what critics described as a bizarre stunt that trivialized a serious discussion on health policy. His “starfish speech” capped off an afternoon where Kennedy was often interrupted and prevented from responding fully to questions.

For many watching, the moment cemented Luján’s reputation for turning hearings into spectacles. What should have been an exchange about facts and policy instead ended with a senator making himself the headline.

Sen. Luján melts down in hearing, wags ‘starfish pin’ at HHS Secretary Kennedy Read More »

Governor’s special session ignores crime crisis, focuses on bashing Trump

15 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham announced Thursday that she will convene lawmakers in a special session beginning Oct. 1, 2025, citing what she called “devastating” federal budget cuts signed into law by President Donald Trump.

According to the governor’s office, the session will focus on preserving access to critical services in the wake of steep reductions to Medicaid and food assistance programs. The administration’s proposed agenda includes stabilizing rural health care providers through grants, lowering health insurance costs for families losing Medicaid coverage, boosting food aid for children and seniors, and shoring up the state’s Health Care Authority as it braces for new Medicaid enrollment changes.

“New Mexicans should not be forced to shoulder these heavy burdens without help from their elected officials,” Lujan Grisham said, blaming Washington for forcing costs onto the states. Legislative Democrats echoed her message. Senate Majority Leader Peter Wirth (D-Santa Fe) called the session “essential to protect our rural healthcare providers, safeguard Medicaid coverage, and ensure that New Mexicans don’t bear the burden of federal failures.”

House Speaker Javier Martínez (D-Albuquerque) struck an even sharper tone, saying, “New Mexico is not going to allow Trump and the radical right to take food off your table or kick your family off your healthcare plan.”

But Republicans say the governor’s priorities miss the mark. Senate GOP leaders announced they will use the special session to again press for tougher juvenile justice laws, stronger accountability for repeat offenders, reforms at the troubled Children, Youth and Families Department, and changes to medical malpractice policies they argue would expand health care access.

GOP lawmakers argue that past Democratic opposition has blocked common-sense reforms aimed at curbing crime and protecting vulnerable children. They also point to long-standing Democratic resistance to joining the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact, a move they contend would attract more doctors to the state.

This October’s meeting will mark the seventh special session under Lujan Grisham’s tenure. The governor has also indicated she wants to fold in discussions of behavioral health challenges tied to public safety, which could stretch into next year’s regular 30-day session.

The political clash sets up a familiar dynamic: Democrats framing the gathering as a shield against federal cuts, while Republicans push to address crime, child welfare, and health care reforms they say New Mexicans have demanded for years.

Governor’s special session ignores crime crisis, focuses on bashing Trump Read More »

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 … 229
Scroll to Top