Politics

NM judge slaps Meta with $567M child safety fund

8 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Meta has been ordered to pay $567 million into a New Mexico abatement fund after a judge found the company’s platforms contributed to the youth mental health crisis in the state, marking another major blow to Big Tech in a growing wave of child safety litigation.

The order, reported by CNBC, follows an earlier finding that Meta willfully violated New Mexico’s Unfair Practices Act. The company had already been hit with $375 million in civil penalties earlier this year. The new $567 million abatement fund brings the total price tag in the case to nearly $1 billion.

Judge Bryan Biedscheid wrote that Meta’s platforms were a “significant contributing factor” to the “current mental health crisis among New Mexico’s youth,” according to the report.

The fund is intended to address alleged harm tied to the use of Meta’s platforms by young people in New Mexico. Most of the money — $420 million — is designated for treatment. The rest is slated for awareness and prevention, screening, referrals, coordination, implementation, quality improvement, and evaluation.

The case has become one of the most consequential state-level fights against social media companies, which are increasingly facing lawsuits over claims that their products harm children, expose minors to predators, and worsen mental health problems.

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez sued Meta in 2023 after his office conducted an undercover investigation involving a fake profile for a 13-year-old girl. Torrez previously said the account was quickly flooded with sexualized content and solicitations from predators.

The ruling gives Torrez one of the biggest wins yet in his campaign against Meta, though the order appears to fall short of the sweeping product overhaul his office initially sought.

Before the second phase of the trial, Torrez had pushed for major changes to how Meta does business in New Mexico, including stronger age-verification technology, changes to recommendation systems, and other child safety modifications.

In a statement, Torrez said the judgment holds Meta accountable for harm to “our children, our families, and our schools” and forces “real changes” in New Mexico.

Meta disagreed sharply with the ruling and said it will appeal.

The company said it works to keep users safe and remains confident in its child safety record. Meta also accused critics of advancing “claims that misrepresent the facts.”

The order does require Meta to continue improving age assurance models and tools in New Mexico, including the use of artificial intelligence. The company must also attempt to create a model within two years that can better identify users under age 13.

Other required steps include making it easier to report underage users and partnering with schools or a child safety organization to create a portal where administrators can flag suspected accounts belonging to children under 13.

But the judge did not force Meta to change its algorithms, a major limitation in the ruling. Biedscheid found that mandating algorithm changes could run into Section 230 and First Amendment concerns.

The court also did not require Meta to end support for end-to-end encryption on Facebook. The judge further found that WhatsApp was not part of the public nuisance being addressed, noting that predators and harmful content are not recommended to adolescents on that platform in the same way.

That split result is important.

On one hand, New Mexico secured a massive monetary remedy and new child-safety requirements against one of the world’s most powerful technology companies. On the other hand, Meta avoided some of the most aggressive remedies that could have reshaped the company’s core products in the state.

The ruling comes as social media companies face what some legal experts have described as a “Big Tobacco” moment. Just as tobacco companies were once forced to confront claims that they misled the public about health risks, tech giants are now being challenged over whether they designed addictive products while downplaying risks to children.

For New Mexico, the case also highlights a grim reality: the state’s youth mental health system is already strained. The judge cited testimony from professionals in fields including health care and noted that New Mexico lacks enough programs and services to meet the needs of troubled youth allegedly harmed by social media.

Meta disclosed in a financial filing that the New Mexico Attorney General’s Office had indicated it could seek up to $62.85 billion in penalties in the case, meaning the legal battle may not be over.

The company’s appeal will likely test how far states can go in using public nuisance and consumer protection laws against social media platforms. It will also raise broader questions about free speech, platform liability, parental responsibility, child exploitation, and whether courts can force tech companies to redesign products used by millions of people.

For now, New Mexico has landed a major judgment against Meta.

But the biggest fight — whether Big Tech can be forced to fundamentally change how it interacts with children — is still far from over.

NM judge slaps Meta with $567M child safety fund Read More »

Epstein committee gets $750K legal contract, delivers 119 pages of nothing

12 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

A taxpayer-funded New Mexico House special committee created to investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s activities at Zorro Ranch has released its long-awaited interim report — and after months of work, a large outside legal team, 20 subpoenas, and access to more than 100,000 records, the panel produced virtually nothing New Mexicans did not already know.

Despite repeatedly branding itself as the “New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission,” the panel is not an independent commission. Its own report acknowledges that it is formally a special committee of the New Mexico House of Representatives, created through House Resolution 1 during the 2026 legislative session.

The distinction matters because the panel has attempted to surround itself with the trappings of a sweeping international “truth commission,” even devoting pages of its report to United Nations concepts typically used after dictatorships, armed conflicts, and widespread human-rights atrocities.

What New Mexicans actually received was a 119-page government-produced book report.

The report summarizes Epstein’s history, describes the acreage and buildings at Zorro Ranch, catalogs employees, recounts publicly available flight logs (but omitted the flight log where Democrat gubernatorial candidate Deb Haaland used his jet), discusses internet connections at the property, lists telephone systems, and repeats information already contained in federal court filings, media reports, and millions of pages released through the federal Epstein Files Transparency Act.

The seriousness of Epstein’s abuse and the suffering of his victims are beyond dispute. But that does not excuse government officials from accountability for how they spend public resources — particularly when they use those survivors’ experiences to justify an expensive investigation that has so far delivered no charges, no identified new perpetrator, no completed financial analysis, and no meaningful legislative proposal, as promised when attempting to pass it. According to Source New Mexico in February:

Some members also wanted to know whether the subcommittee intends to prevent future activity such as has been alleged to have occurred at Zorro Ranch.

“Do you believe that this legislation could, in the future, help us hold these people and various actors from being able to be in a haven in New Mexico, from procuring our land and doing these horrifying things here,” state Rep. John Block (R-Alamogordo) asked Romero.

Romero said whatever the commission learns, “we can also propose specific policies that can help close loops that were open for these crimes to take place or nefarious actions to take place.”

The committee hired the law firm Fadduol, Cluff, Hardy & Conaway P.C. under a contract worth up to $750,000 through December 31, 2026. The investigation includes six attorneys and seven paralegals working at least part time. The report also acknowledges that the legal team used artificial intelligence tools to navigate the documentary record.

For that substantial commitment of public resources, the committee issued 20 subpoenas and says it obtained more than 100,000 records. Ten subpoena recipients fully complied, two partially complied, and eight refused or did not respond.

Yet the committee’s own disclaimer admits the allegations and information in the document “are not findings.” It further concedes that the interim report “offers no final findings” and merely intends to identify themes and pose additional questions.

That is an extraordinary admission after months of work.

The committee’s mandate was to determine whether legislation or other legislative action was necessary to punish crime, protect children and vulnerable people, improve access to civil justice, safeguard public resources, and establish accountability.

The interim report does none of those things.

It proposes no major bill. It identifies no clear statutory deficiency. It announces no referral resulting in criminal charges. It establishes no new compensation mechanism for survivors. It names no previously unknown New Mexico official who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes.

Instead, the document repeats conclusions that had already been widely reported: Epstein abused women and girls, powerful people remained within his orbit, and law enforcement authorities failed to fully investigate what happened in New Mexico.

The committee says evidence supports the conclusion that Epstein abused at least five women and girls at Zorro Ranch between 1996 and 2012. But those accounts were largely taken from preexisting FBI records, court documents, survivor statements, and the federal prosecution of Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell — not newly uncovered evidence produced by the special committee.

The report also discusses an unverified tip claiming two bodies were buried at the ranch. But a March 2026 search conducted by the New Mexico Department of Justice using cadaver dogs and ground-penetrating radar found no human remains.

On possible financial crimes, the panel reached no conclusion whatsoever. It says bank records remain incomplete and expressly “defers reporting” on whether Epstein or anyone else engaged in financial irregularities in New Mexico.

Even the report’s concluding “observations” amount to little more than statements of the obvious.

The first is that Epstein retained power and influence after becoming a registered sex offender. The second is that he conducted his operation largely in plain sight. The third is that New Mexico law enforcement played a passive role while authorities elsewhere handled the case.

Those points may be true, but none required a sprawling special committee, a $750,000 legal-services contract, and a glossy 119-page report to establish.

The committee also missed its own statutory deadline. HR-1 required the interim report to be furnished by July 31, 2026. The report is dated August 5.

After all the buildup, the final page does not present an accountability plan or even a concrete roadmap. It simply says the committee will keep reviewing records, issuing subpoenas, and interviewing witnesses.

In other words: stay tuned, keep spending, and perhaps the next report will contain the actual investigation.

New Mexicans deserved better than a costly compilation of publicly available Epstein material dressed up as a landmark government inquiry. Survivors deserved a serious pursuit of identifiable perpetrators, institutional accountability, and specific reforms — not another government body using their trauma to justify bureaucracy, consultants, and months of political theater.

The crimes were real. The government failures were real.

But this special committee’s first major product is little more than an expensive nothing-burger. Read the report for yourself here.

Epstein committee gets $750K legal contract, delivers 119 pages of nothing Read More »

Vasquez hitches campaign to anti-ICE radical to attack former cop

15 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

U.S. Rep. Gabe Vasquez has hitched his reelection campaign to a full-blown radical anti-ICE activist in a new left-wing video attacking Republican congressional candidate Greg Cunningham, a former Marine, police officer, and undercover detective.

The video, posted directly by Vasquez on X and credited to Courier New Mexico, features Ben Montoya, a they/them activist and podcast producer whose uncovered public posts show a long history of anti-ICE rhetoric, anti-police commentary, anti-prison activism, anti-capitalist views, and profane attacks on conservatives.

The video attempts to smear Cunningham by tying him to Legacy Church in Albuquerque, Charlie Kirk, and traditional Christian beliefs on marriage and gender. It opens by calling Cunningham the “megachurch pastor’s pick” and a “MAGA-backed candidate” trying to flip New Mexico’s 2nd Congressional District.

The Courier video claims Cunningham was inspired to run after a speech by the conservative now-slain activist Charlie Kirk at Legacy Church. It then displays language from the church’s website stating that “God created male and female” and that the church only sanctions marriage between “a man and a woman.”

From there, the video warns that abortion and “LGBTQ” rights are “protected in New Mexico” but “face challenges from candidates aligned with churches that oppose them.”

But there is a glaring problem with the attack: the video does not show Cunningham saying he is “anti-gay,” nor does it provide evidence that he is targeting gay New Mexicans. Instead, it leans on supposed guilt by association, taking a church’s statement of faith and using it to portray Cunningham as extreme.

That smear becomes even more revealing when looking at the person Vasquez chose to amplify.

Posts and profile information uncovered from Montoya’s public accounts show the Courier New Mexico personality using they/them pronouns and listing #BlackLivesMatter on X. Montoya’s linked Tumblr profile includes the slogans “Free Palestine” and “F**k ICE.”

That was not a one-off.

This January, Montoya proposed an anti-ICE protest being held in Albuquerque, calling for the abolition of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

In July 2020, Montoya reposted a claim about ICE policy affecting international students and added the hashtag “#AbolishICE.” On the same day, Montoya quoted a Santa Fe New Mexican story about migrants on a hunger strike and added “#AbolishICE” and “#AbolishPrisons.”

Montoya wrote that migrants “were on a dayslong hunger strike when guards entered their prison dormitory in full riot gear — gas masks, shields and canisters of pepper spray,” then tied the post to abolitionist slogans.

In another uncovered post, Montoya reacted to a story about immigration enforcement by writing, “Another revolting story that I had no idea of until today. This f**king country…”

Montoya also attacked civilian border-security efforts in New Mexico, writing, “I can’t think of a bigger waste of time than pointing a big a** gun at nothing for days.” In the same thread, Montoya described the border crisis narrative as a “manufactured ‘crisis at the border’” and accused border-security activists of acting under “white supremacist” logic.

The pattern goes beyond immigration enforcement.

Montoya promoted abolitionist policing ideas, including #8ToAbolition, a framework that rejects ordinary police reform and pushes toward dismantling policing and prisons as currently structured.

In posts about the 2020 shooting of Rodney Applewhite by New Mexico State Police, Montoya wrote, “His name was Rodney Applewhite,” adding that he was “murdered by NM state police because of a ‘traffic stop.’” Montoya also amplified language claiming Applewhite was “lynched by state police.”

Even while acknowledging in a thread that Applewhite fled a traffic stop, drove dangerously, and tried to grab an officer’s gun, Montoya rejected the idea that the shooting was justified and wrote, “Black lives f**king matter and police must be held accountable for every life they’ve taken.”

That is the radical voice Vasquez chose to elevate in an attack on Cunningham — a former law enforcement officer.

Montoya’s broader online presence also shows the same ideological worldview. One uncovered post promoted Democracy Now as “independent media that is critical of military industrial complex and capitalism.” Another response to NPR’s Throughline suggested an episode on “the symbiotic relationship between mass incarceration and capitalism.”

Other posts show open hostility toward President Donald Trump. One post simply read, “F**K DONALD TRUMP.” Another post reacted to Trump’s 2020 Republican National Convention imagery by claiming it felt “like a literal horror movie” and sharing the line, “Fascism has indeed arrived draped in a flag.”

This is not a neutral messenger. This is an activist with a documented history of hard-left, anti-ICE, anti-police, anti-prison, anti-capitalist rhetoric.

And that is exactly why Vasquez’s decision to promote the video matters.

Vasquez has spent years trying to run from his own anti-law-enforcement baggage. During the 2020 Black Lives Matter era, Vasquez appeared in a local television interview at a protest and said, “We need serious police reform in this country.” He then added, “It’s not just about defunding police, it’s about defunding a system that privileges white people over everyone else.”

The interview became even more controversial after reporting identified Vasquez as the masked man in the clip, despite the interview being attributed to another name at the time. His campaign later said the name issue came from the station and that he declined to give his name because he wanted the focus on protest organizers.

But the words were his.

Vasquez also has a record of since-deleted posts that mirror the same activist language Montoya has used. CNN’s KFile reported that Vasquez deleted progressive tweets attacking oil and gas, rationalizing rioting, and comparing Trump’s America to the Ku Klux Klan.

In one deleted tweet, Vasquez wrote, “The tip of the spear of a white supremacist system ends in state sanctioned, cold-blooded murder of black individuals.” He continued by saying there was “so much to undo” and “shift power structures,” adding, “That’s why the cars and buildings are burning.”

Ironically, it is Vasquez who has spewed racism, calling a black man a “n—er,” according to a police report.

That language lines up almost perfectly with Montoya’s worldview: police as an arm of a racist system, ICE as something to abolish, prisons as oppressive, capitalism as tied to incarceration, and Christians as dangerous extremists.

Vasquez later tried to clean up the record, saying he opposed defunding the police and claiming he supported police funding while on the Las Cruces City Council. But his past statements continue to follow him for a reason.

Now, he is not just being judged by an old clip. He is actively promoting a new attack from a radical left-wing activist whose record reinforces the very worldview Vasquez claims not to hold.

Cunningham’s background could not be more different. Cunningham is a former Recon Marine, police officer, and undercover detective who has campaigned on public safety, service, border security, and support for law enforcement.

The Courier video’s attack on Cunningham is therefore not just about one Republican candidate. It is part of a broader left-wing strategy: make Christian beliefs sound hateful, make law-and-order candidates sound dangerous, and let anti-police activists do the talking.

That, mixed with Montoya’s posts mocking Jesus, saying God being “killed” would be “quite the payoff,” and Christians in general also play into this deep anti-Christian sentiment spewed by the Courier. 

Courier New Mexico is part of Courier Newsroom, a national progressive dark money media network that expanded into New Mexico in 2026. Axios has described Courier as a news group with a “progressive perspective,” and Courier itself describes its model as “values-driven” media. The group, which is funded by billionaire George Soros, has been accused in the past of being “driven by political agendas intended to manipulate unwitting readers” and labeled “pink slime journalism.”

So when Vasquez posts Courier’s video, he is not sharing some neutral fact-check. He is amplifying a progressive media hit featuring an activist with a long paper trail of radical rhetoric.

That raises a simple question for voters in southern New Mexico: Why is Gabe Vasquez using a they/them, “F**k ICE,” #AbolishICE activist to attack a former police detective?

“My wife Jennifer and I have built our life around faith, family and service. Gabe Vasquez and his friends are attacking me for my faith because they’re getting desperate. And every New Mexican can see right through it,” Cunningham told the Piñon Post.

“The truth is, Gabe isn’t just attacking me. He’s attacking every person of faith who wants to make their community a better place. This isn’t going to slow us down. We have a mission to accomplish.”

For a congressman still trying to convince voters he is not anti-police, Vasquez just made that job much harder.

He could have defended his record. He could have debated Cunningham on the border, crime, inflation, energy, or public safety.

Instead, Vasquez boosted a radical left-wing attack from a person whose own posts show hostility toward ICE, prisons, police, Trump supporters, capitalism, and traditional values.

That says far more about Gabe Vasquez than it does about Greg Cunningham.

Editor’s note: All noted references have been saved by the Piñon Post with timestamps, screenshots, URL links, and other metadata to ensure their preservation.

Vasquez hitches campaign to anti-ICE radical to attack former cop Read More »

Disgraced Dem leader Stapleton’s trial opens with stunning defense

13 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Former New Mexico House Majority Leader Sheryl Williams Stapleton’s federal corruption trial opened this week with a stunning defense: she may have taken money that did not belong to her, but her attorney argued she did not steal from taxpayers.

Stapleton, once one of the most powerful Democrats in the New Mexico Legislature, is facing a 37-count federal indictment tied to allegations that she helped steer roughly $3.2 million in federal vocational training money to a company run by longtime friend and co-defendant Joseph Johnson, then received more than $1 million in kickbacks.

Her attorney, Ryan Villa, told jurors Tuesday that Stapleton is “not 100% innocent,” according to the Santa Fe New Mexican, but argued she is not guilty of the federal charges prosecutors brought against her.

Yes, Villa acknowledged, Stapleton took money that was not hers and failed to report it on her taxes. But he argued she took the money from Johnson’s company and a nonprofit they ran — not from taxpayers.

“She is not guilty of bribery, fraud or money laundering,” Villa told jurors.

Villa insisted there was no “pay to play,” no “quid pro quo,” and no evidence that Stapleton and Johnson carried out a long-running scheme to defraud the federal government or Albuquerque Public Schools.

He told jurors the real question was not simply whether Stapleton took money, but “who did she take money from?”

Johnson’s attorney, Nicole Moss, offered a similar finger-pointing defense, telling jurors Johnson was also innocent and that the public received the software Albuquerque Public Schools paid for through Robotics Management Learning Systems.

Moss described Johnson as a hardworking businessman who was allegedly betrayed by “one of his oldest friends” while distracted by the death of his young son.

“The victim here, the person who was cheated by Ms. Stapleton, was Mr. Johnson,” Moss said.

In other words, both defendants appear to agree on one thing: there was no conspiracy between them. Stapleton’s defense says she took from Johnson’s operation, not taxpayers. Johnson’s defense says he was the one cheated by Stapleton.

But federal prosecutors are telling jurors a much different story — and the defense argument has a major problem.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Federici alleged the two longtime friends struck a “corrupt bargain” that “kept millions flowing” to Johnson’s company. Prosecutors say Stapleton, in her role as career and technical education director for APS, helped direct federal education funds toward Johnson’s company and moved invoices through the procurement process.

In return, Federici said, Robotics Management Learning Systems provided Stapleton with blank company checks that she used as she wished.

Prosecutors said roughly 95% of the money in the Robotics bank account came from federal education funds obtained through APS contracts. They also alleged the company received about $3.4 million from APS and federal vocational training funds, with approximately 73% of that total treated as profit.

According to Federici, Stapleton and Johnson split that profit, each walking away with about $1 million for personal use. Stapleton allegedly failed to report any of it on financial disclosures required by her positions as a state legislator and APS administrator.

That is where the “she stole from her friend, not taxpayers” argument starts to collapse. If prosecutors are right that the money entering Robotics was overwhelmingly taxpayer-funded, then the public money did not become irrelevant simply because it passed through Johnson’s company before allegedly ending up in Stapleton’s hands.

The case also comes against the backdrop of years of prior Piñon Post reporting that raised questions about both Stapleton and Johnson long before opening statements began.

Piñon Post previously reported that Robotics Management Learning Systems was registered at a Washington, D.C., address tied to Johnson and his National Corrections and Rehabilitation Corporation, and that Johnson was also listed as president of Ujima Foundation, another entity prosecutors have tied to the alleged scheme.

The prior exclusive reporting also documented that Stapleton and Johnson’s relationship stretches back decades, including shared political circles at New Mexico State University, NAACP connections, and later Rainbow Coalition ties.

Johnson’s own past has not been clean of controversy. Piñon Post previously reported that during the Toney Anaya years, Johnson was charged by state prosecutors with felony counts including bribery, fraud, conspiracy, illegal kickbacks, and racketeering after a scandal involving a state-contracted mental health center. The charges were ultimately dismissed after a key witness recanted, and Johnson later returned to government as Anaya’s chief of staff.

Piñon Post also reported on other Johnson business controversies, including a HUD report finding that a Johnson-linked company in Virginia had “inappropriately spent” nearly half a million dollars in hospital operating funds on questionable contracts, board compensation, country-club dues, travel, entertainment, and housing unrelated to hospital operations.

Stapleton’s public career also came with years of questions. In 2011, KRQE’s Larry Barker reported Stapleton “pocketed more than $100,000 — money she didn’t earn — from APS over the years while serving in the legislature,” with APS later changing rules rather than forcing repayment. She was also accused by a former Martin Luther King Jr. Commission executive director of coercing a no-bid contract involving eRead, though Stapleton denied involvement.

Now, in federal court, Stapleton’s defense is not claiming she did nothing wrong. It is claiming the wrong she did was not the federal corruption scheme prosecutors allege.

The trial is expected to continue through Aug. 14, with prosecutors listing dozens of potential witnesses. Stapleton also faces a separate state case set for trial in October, where she is accused of 28 crimes, including violating ethical principles of public service, soliciting or receiving an illegal kickback, and engaging in an official act for personal financial gain.

Both Stapleton and Johnson are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.

But the opening defense pitch — that money was taken, just not from taxpayers — may be a difficult sell when prosecutors say the cash trail began with federal education money meant for students.

Disgraced Dem leader Stapleton’s trial opens with stunning defense Read More »

Luján’s fundraising panic gets weird fast

22 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

U.S. Sen. Ben Ray Luján’s campaign appears to be in full-blown manufactured fundraising panic mode, sending a barrage of increasingly dramatic emails warning supporters that Democrats could “throw in the towel,” “kiss their chances” of taking the Senate goodbye, and even claiming survey data could become “invalid” if recipients do not respond fast enough.

The string of emails, sent over several days around the campaign’s end-of-month fundraising deadline, shows just how frantic Democrat campaign messaging has become as Luján seeks reelection and national Democrats look for a path back to the Senate majority.

The pleas began with the usual manufactured urgency, but quickly veered into absurd territory.

On July 28, Luján’s campaign sent an “URGENT DEMOCRATIC POLLING” email asking the supposedly critical political question: “DO YOU RECYCLE?”

The email appeared falsely personalized to the recipient, claiming the person had been selected for a local recycling survey and was “representing” Santa Fe Democrats. It said the campaign was reaching out because of “concerning data in Santa Fe regarding low recycling rates.”

“We’re in the midst of a MASSIVE environmental crisis,” the email warned, adding that the campaign still needed “[331] responses to reach statistical significance.”

Two days later, the same recycling-themed email appeared again, with the same “DO YOU RECYCLE?” question and the same claim that 331 responses were needed.

By July 29, the tone had shifted from recycling panic to Senate doom.

“I don’t know what to say,” one email began.

“We’re 2 DAYS away from our end-of-month fundraising deadline. If we don’t hit our goal, we won’t be able to flip the Senate blue. We won’t be able to fight Trump’s agenda,” the email warned.

Then came the highlighted line: “But no one — I mean no one — has donated.”

The campaign claimed “our future is on the line,” along with “the fate of Social Security and Medicare” and even “gas prices.” The email then asked whether the recipient had “anything to spare to help STOP Trump,” warning that Democrats had “only 24 hours left” — despite the same email saying the deadline was two days away.

On July 30, Luján’s campaign claimed it was still “[447] donations short” of its goal.

“If I don’t hit my end-of-month goal, Democrats can kiss their chances at retaking the Senate goodbye,” the email stated. It claimed “the GOP is SWARMING New Mexico” and warned, “If Democrats don’t take back the Senate, MAGA wins.”

The campaign then escalated further: “And if MAGA wins, Trump gets to bulldoze his agenda through Congress. The future of Social Security, Medicare, and gas prices will all be uncertain.”

But perhaps the most bizarre emails involved MS NOW (formerly MSNBC) host Rachel Maddow.

On July 30, Luján’s campaign sent an email with the subject line “GOODBYE, RACHEL MADDOW.” The email claimed, “Trump managed to get Stephen Colbert fired. And now, he’s calling for MSNBC to FIRE Rachel Maddow!” The email couldn’t even get Maddow’s network name correct.

The campaign said it had launched an “URGENT Viewership Poll” to “PROVE massive grassroots support for Rachel Maddow” and demanded the recipient submit a response “in the next 30 minutes.”

A follow-up email the next day, titled “FWD: Rachel Maddow FIRED?!” said the campaign was “RACING to prove that top Democrats support Rachel Maddow” and needed a “98% response rate.”

The campaign warned that Maddow had “courageously EXPOSED Trump and MAGA’s corruption time after time” and that Trump would “LOVE to say goodbye to brave journalists like Rachel Maddow who speak truth to power.”

By July 31, deadline-day panic reached its peak.

“This is the final time we’ll ask you to donate $9 to help RE-ELECT Ben Ray Luján,” the email began, before admitting, “As of this morning, we’re still DANGEROUSLY short of our goal.”

The campaign warned that if Democrats “lose here it’s OVER” and said it had emailed supporters “over and over” because “if things don’t turn around, we’ll have to pack our bags and throw in the towel.”

Then came the “Harsh Reality” section, claiming “The GOP is swarming New Mexico” and that “Donald Trump is trying to RIG elections after his administration FAILED the American people.”

The same email claimed that if the campaign raised “20,000 Senate Memberships” before midnight, Democrats could “END Trump’s razor-thin Senate Majority.” If they succeeded, it declared, “the rest of his corrupt presidency is TOAST!”

The deadline apparently did not end the begging.

On Aug. 1, Luján’s campaign sent another email “humbly asking” for support, claiming there were “less than 4 months until one of the biggest elections of our lifetimes” and saying it needed 2,000 supporters before a new deadline “TONIGHT.”

That same day, another falsely personalized email claimed the campaign had “some concern that many Democrats may have switched parties since the last election.” It asked the recipient to confirm whether they were still a Democrat or “now a Republican,” saying it needed “10 local responses” for its data to be valid.

By Sunday morning, the panic returned to Social Security.

An Aug. 2 email with the subject line “[gutted] what Trump did to Social Security” claimed Democrats were fighting “tooth and nail to SAVE Social Security from Trump’s cuts,” but warned, “the worst has happened.”

It then told the recipient that the survey “needs to begin within 5 minutes of opening this email” or “our data from your state will be INVALID.”

Taken together, the emails show a campaign relying on a steady diet of panic, guilt, fake deadlines, falsely personalized “polls,” and apocalyptic Trump warnings to shake loose cash and clicks.

Whether the campaign actually missed its July deadline is unclear from the emails alone. But the fact that the pleas continued after the deadline — with new urgent demands, new polls, and new warnings — suggests Luján’s campaign was not exactly projecting confidence.

For a longtime incumbent Democrat in New Mexico, the message to supporters was unmistakable: panic now, donate fast, or Rachel Maddow, Social Security, gas prices, recycling, and the entire Senate may apparently be doomed.

However, the panic about supposed failures to meet fundraising goals is completely false, as the last FEC filing at the end of June shows $4,396,754.26 cash on hand for Lujan, with disbursements from the campaign since last year of $2,443,667.94 — hardly a place to “panic.” Republican Larry Marker is the GOP name to take on Lujan.

Luján’s fundraising panic gets weird fast Read More »

Haaland hits panic button after poll shows gov’s race tightening

23 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Democrat Deb Haaland’s campaign is sounding the alarm after a Republican-backed poll showed New Mexico’s race for governor far closer than many political insiders expected.

In a fundraising email sent Thursday afternoon, Haaland told supporters she had “just got our newest poll,” calling it “a tough one.”

“It shows us trailing by 6 points,” the email stated.

The message was tied to an urgent end-of-month fundraising push, asking supporters to chip in before a deadline “tomorrow at midnight” to help the campaign hit a $50,000 goal. The email also included a graphic showing a “Republican opponent” at 49%, Haaland at 43%, and 8% undecided.

The poll referenced in the email appears to be the same McLaughlin & Associates survey released by Republican Gregg Hull’s campaign. That poll, conducted July 13-15 among 400 likely New Mexico general election voters, initially showed Haaland narrowly ahead of Hull, 46% to 45%, with 9% undecided — a statistical tie within the poll’s 4.9% margin of error.

But after voters were given more information, Hull’s campaign says the race shifted to a 49% to 43% Hull lead, the number Haaland’s own fundraising email appears to have seized on.

That means saying Haaland is simply “losing” is not the full picture. The initial ballot showed her technically ahead by one point, though statistically tied. The six-point Hull advantage came on the informed ballot, after voters learned more about the candidates.

Still, the tone of Haaland’s email suggests her campaign is taking the poll seriously.

“MAGA donors have already poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into this race, and this poll will only encourage them to spend even more trying to buy this election, flip New Mexico red, and bring Donald Trump’s extreme agenda to our state,” the email warned.

“This is an all-hands-on-deck moment,” the campaign added, asking grassroots supporters to “step up right now.”

The poll comes shortly after Haaland won the June Democratic primary in a blowout and as many national observers have treated New Mexico as a safe bet for Democrats. Sabato’s Crystal Ball recently moved the race from “Likely Democratic” to “Safe Democratic,” arguing that Haaland appeared well-positioned to keep the governor’s mansion in Democrat hands.

But Hull’s campaign is trying to use the new numbers to argue the race is far from over.

“Gregg Hull is currently a more likeable candidate for governor over the polarizing Deb Haaland,” McLaughlin & Associates wrote in its polling memo, according to the Santa Fe New Mexican’s report.

“With the right resources, it’s clear that Gregg Hull can win the election,” the memo stated.

Hull also posted a campaign graphic declaring the race a “statistical tie” on the initial ballot and claiming he leads by six points on the informed ballot.

The graphic, branded with Hull’s campaign logo and the slogan “Experience Matters. Leadership That Works,” shows Hull at 45% and Haaland at 46% on the initial ballot, with 9% undecided. On the informed ballot, it shows Hull at 49%, Haaland at 43%, and 8% undecided.

Hull used the poll to ask supporters for donations, writing that the race is close because voters have not yet fully heard his story.

“This race isn’t close because New Mexicans want more of the same — it’s close because we haven’t finished telling my story yet,” Hull wrote in a fundraising email.

Haaland’s campaign appears to be making the opposite argument: that Republicans will use the poll to raise money, nationalize the race, and attack her with outside spending.

The poll also lands at a messy moment for Democrats. Haaland’s original running mate, Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver, won the Democratic primary for lieutenant governor but later dropped out, forcing party insiders to choose a replacement. Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard narrowly won that insider vote this week after a scramble inside the Democratic Party.

Now, Haaland’s campaign is trying to turn a Republican poll into a fundraising emergency.

Whether the survey proves to be a true warning sign or merely a Republican internal poll designed to boost Hull’s fundraising, one thing is clear: Haaland’s team is no longer acting like New Mexico’s governor race is a sleepy coronation.

The race national Democrats hoped to label “safe” is suddenly being treated by Haaland’s own campaign as an “all-hands-on-deck” fight.

Haaland hits panic button after poll shows gov’s race tightening Read More »

Garcia Richard barely beats challenger for Dem LG nod

20 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

New Mexico Democrats have officially chosen Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard as their new lieutenant governor nominee, ending weeks of internal party maneuvering after Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver abruptly left the race.

Garcia Richard announced Thursday morning that the Democratic Party of New Mexico’s State Central Committee had selected her to replace Toulouse Oliver on the ticket.

“It’s official — The Democratic Party of New Mexico’s State Central Committee has chosen me as our party’s new nominee for Lieutenant Governor!” Garcia Richard wrote on X. “THANK YOU. I am honored, humbled, and fired up.”

The post included a campaign graphic reading, “Thank you, SCC! I’m ready to serve and build a brighter future for New Mexico. Let’s win this!”

The Democratic Party of New Mexico also released a statement declaring Garcia Richard the winner of the State Central Committee election to fill the lieutenant governor vacancy on the ticket alongside Democratic gubernatorial nominee Deb Haaland.

“Our State Central Committee of Democrats from across New Mexico spoke, and they chose Stephanie,” DPNM Chair Sara Attleson said in the release. “New Mexico Democrats could not be more excited to be campaigning for the Deb and Stephanie ticket across New Mexico.”

Attleson praised Garcia Richard’s experience in the State Land Office, the Legislature, and the classroom, saying she would bring a “highly capable and qualified voice to the Roundhouse” alongside Haaland.

But the vote was not exactly a sweeping show of unity.

According to the party’s own results, Garcia Richard received 255 votes, or 53%, while state Sen. Harold Pope Jr. received 218 votes, or 46%. Toni Pinedo received three votes, and Geoffrey Luehring received one.

Voting was conducted by electronic ballot after the July 25 State Central Committee meeting and closed at 5 p.m. on July 29. Roughly 500 SCC members were eligible to vote, and the party said 97% participated. Because Garcia Richard received a majority of first-place votes, she won automatically without the party needing to use its ranked-choice tally.

The result caps off a chaotic Democratic lieutenant governor scramble. Toulouse Oliver had won the Democratic primary for lieutenant governor but later suspended her campaign, creating a vacancy that party insiders — not regular primary voters — were tasked with filling.

Garcia Richard had previously run for the office before exiting the race, only to reemerge once the slot reopened. Haaland then publicly endorsed her, giving Garcia Richard the establishment boost heading into the SCC vote.

In a follow-up post, Garcia Richard thanked the other candidates “for a spirited campaign” and singled out Pope for his “leadership and commitment to our state.”

“I look forward to working alongside him and leaders across New Mexico to build the future our communities deserve,” she wrote.

She added that she would be on the ballot with Haaland in November and said the pair would fight to “lower costs, expand access to healthcare, build safer communities, and deliver a world-class public education for every child.”

“Let’s unite and win this for New Mexico!” Garcia Richard wrote.

Democrats are now trying to present the Haaland-Garcia Richard ticket as settled and unified after a messy vacancy process that followed Toulouse Oliver’s exit.

But the numbers show Pope came within striking distance, despite Haaland already making clear who she wanted as her running mate. Garcia Richard’s win came by 37 votes out of 477 cast.

The process also highlights the unusual way the Democratic ticket was rebuilt after primary voters had already spoken. Instead of another statewide vote, the decision was placed in the hands of party insiders on the SCC.

Garcia Richard now joins Haaland on the Democratic ticket heading into the general election against Republican gubernatorial nominee Gregg Hull and Republican lieutenant governor nominee David Gallegos.

For Democrats, the announcement is an attempt to move past an embarrassing vacancy and rally behind Haaland’s preferred pick. For Republicans, it gives them a new argument: New Mexico Democrats’ general election ticket was finished not by voters, but by a few hundred party insiders.

Garcia Richard barely beats challenger for Dem LG nod Read More »

Vasquez’s ‘working in NM’ posts hit Alaska-sized problem

6 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

U.S. Rep. Gabe Vasquez is facing new scrutiny after a report revealed his social media accounts posted New Mexico district content while he was actually traveling to Alaska on a privately sponsored backpacking trip tied to a conservation dark money group led by a Democratic mega-donor.

The Santa Fe New Mexican reported that Vasquez’s official X account posted on Aug. 10, 2025, about a visit to Hobbs High School, making it appear to casual readers as though the Democrat congressman was in southeastern New Mexico.

“I visited Hobbs High School to help serve lunch and hear about how school meals are keeping kids healthy and focused,” the post read. “Free school meal programs are a lifeline that our kids can’t afford to lose.”

But according to post-travel disclosure forms filed with the House Committee on Ethics, Vasquez was not in Hobbs that day. He was flying to Alaska for a trip sponsored by the American Lands Project, a dark money grou[ that describes its mission as connecting policymakers with “our country’s irreplaceable public lands and waters.”

The reported value of the trip, including transportation, lodging, meals, and other expenses for Vasquez, was approximately $11,535, according to the New Mexican.

The American Lands Project’s board president is identified as Thomas Campion, a conservationist who has opposed President Donald Trump’s efforts to expand oil and gas leasing in Alaska, including in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

The trip was described in disclosure paperwork as a “fact-finding trip to experience and learn firsthand about the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and meet with local residents that rely on these lands.”

Vasquez’s office defended the timed social media posts as standard practice.

“It’s pretty common to post on social after we do events, which is why in any of those posts, we don’t say ‘today,’” Jake Morel, Vasquez’s press secretary and digital director, told the New Mexican.

Morel said Vasquez and other elected officials regularly spread out content to maximize attention.

“Our office and several other offices frequently bank content, which is pretty common because if, for example, I sent you five press releases at a time, you probably wouldn’t cover all five,” he said. “You maybe would cover one, and you’d probably just be annoyed I’m bombing your inbox.”

Republicans, however, said the posts gave New Mexicans the wrong impression.

“Gabe Vasquez spent that week pretending to New Mexicans that he was home working for them,” Josiah Ward, a spokesperson for Republican Greg Cunningham, said in a statement.

“Now we know he was actually in Alaska on an all-expenses paid vacation funded by a Democratic mega-donor whose life work is shutting down oil and gas,” Ward added. “We know who Gabe really works for, and it’s not the people of New Mexico.”

The timing matters because oil and gas is a massive economic force in New Mexico, particularly in Vasquez’s southern New Mexico district. Republicans note that the industry contributes billions to the state budget and supports thousands of jobs in the region.

Since the Alaska trip, Vasquez has voted at least twice against expanding energy development efforts in Alaska, including in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, according to the New Mexican.

Vasquez also posted photos from the Alaska trip on Instagram last month, writing, “As a sportsman, I know the unique value of our public lands and protecting this country’s most beautiful places.”

He added, “Today’s lease sale of the Arctic Refuge is yet another sell-off to special interests that will forever alter the last frontier, Indigenous people and their traditions, wildlife, and recreation opportunities.”

Morel called the Alaska trip “a standard one taken by a lot of members of Congress from both sides of the aisle” and noted that New Mexico Democratic Reps. Melanie Stansbury and Teresa Leger Fernández had also taken the trip.

But the posts continued while Vasquez was in Alaska. According to the New Mexican, photos of Vasquez at Cavern Theatre in Carlsbad were posted on Aug. 11, while the itinerary placed him in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Additional posts on Aug. 13 and Aug. 15 showed him meeting with an immigrant rights group and visiting a Carlsbad restaurant, even though he was still on the Alaska trip.

Morel rejected the idea that the posts implied Vasquez was physically present in those places at the time.

“I don’t think that in this day and age, in our digital world, that anybody posting something needs to give the impression that they are right there at that thing currently,” he said.

The National Republican Congressional Committee also blasted Vasquez over the report.

“Defund the police Gabe Vasquez has been caught lying to New Mexicans once again, pretending to work while galavanting around Alaska on an all-expenses-paid trip with his fellow anti-oil-and-gas extremists,” NRCC spokesman Reilly Richardson said. “Voters know Vasquez is in office to serve one person: himself.”

The controversy comes as Vasquez faces another competitive reelection battle in New Mexico’s 2nd Congressional District. Republicans are working to flip the seat, and the Alaska trip gives them a new line of attack: Vasquez appearing to post district activity while traveling on a donor-connected trip tied to the same anti-drilling agenda he later supported with his votes.

For New Mexicans in an energy-producing district, the question is simple: was Vasquez working for them — or for the environmental donor class that paid for his Alaska adventure?

Vasquez’s ‘working in NM’ posts hit Alaska-sized problem Read More »

Terror-linked CAIR cheers Santa Fe archbishop’s support for ABQ mosque

26 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

A controversial national Muslim advocacy group with a long history of alleged terror ties is praising Santa Fe Archbishop John C. Wester after the Catholic prelate issued a statement supporting a proposed mosque and community center in Albuquerque’s North Valley.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, released a statement Monday welcoming Wester’s comments and thanking him for speaking out in favor of the project, which has drawn opposition from some nearby residents.

CAIR described Wester’s statement as support for “Muslims’ freedom to build mosque” and framed the controversy as part of a broader fight against “rising Islamophobia.”

The archbishop’s statement, titled “Supporting Our Muslim Neighbors’ Right to Worship,” said he had heard concerns from residents regarding the proposed mosque and community center in the North Valley.

“As Archbishop of Santa Fe and a resident of Albuquerque, I feel compelled to speak clearly and pastorally: our Muslim neighbors have the same God-given and constitutionally protected right to worship freely as every other faith community, including our own,” Wester wrote. “Defending that right is not only a civic duty but a core element of Catholic teaching.”

Wester also cited the Second Vatican Council, writing that the Catholic Church has long affirmed religious liberty as essential to human dignity. He said Dignitatis Humanae teaches that every person “must be free from coercion” in matters of faith.

“This principle applies universally,” Wester wrote. “It is not limited to Catholics or Christians; it extends fully to Muslims, Jews, and all people who seek to worship according to their conscience.”

He went further, saying “anti-Muslim sentiment has no place in the heart of a Christian.”

“Any hostility toward Muslims — whether expressed through rhetoric, suspicion, or opposition to their places of worship — is incompatible with the Gospel of Jesus Christ, who commands us to love our neighbor without exception,” Wester wrote.

CAIR quickly celebrated the statement.

“We welcome Archbishop Wester’s principled statement defending religious freedom and thank him for speaking out,” CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper said. “The freedom to worship is a fundamental and inalienable right of every American and every human being. As anti-Muslim bigotry rises throughout our nation, people of conscience and faith must stand together to encourage mutual respect.”

CAIR also noted that it had previously welcomed the Bernalillo County Planning Commission’s decision to reject an appeal and allow the planned Islamic center and mosque to move forward after months of public opposition.

But CAIR’s involvement brings its own baggage.

The group routinely presents itself as a civil rights organization. But critics, law enforcement officials, and Republican attorneys general have pointed for years to CAIR’s alleged ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Earlier this year, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit against the Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR, and CAIR’s Texas chapters, seeking to stop what his office called “terrorist groups” from operating in the state.

Paxton’s office said CAIR-Texas founding board member Ghassan Elashi was convicted in 2008 of funneling $12.4 million to Hamas through the Holy Land Foundation. Federal prosecutors also named CAIR as an unindicted co-conspirator in that case.

According to the Texas lawsuit, “CAIR’s origin story reveals its true nature.” The petition alleges the group was created after a secret 1993 Philadelphia meeting where Hamas operatives, under FBI surveillance, discussed ways to support Hamas while avoiding law enforcement detection.

The lawsuit further cites a 2009 federal court finding that there was “ample evidence to establish the associations of CAIR” with Hamas.

InfluenceWatch, a project of the Capital Research Center, similarly notes that CAIR has long been suspected of supporting political Islamist movements, especially the Muslim Brotherhood. It says CAIR was founded by Nihad Awad and Omar Ahmad, both former officials of the Islamic Association for Palestine, which critics have described as pro-Hamas.

CAIR has repeatedly denied that it supports terrorism and has challenged state-level efforts to label it as a terrorist organization. The group maintains it is a Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization.

Still, for critics of the Albuquerque mosque project, CAIR’s public celebration of Wester’s statement is likely to deepen concern rather than calm it.

The local debate over the North Valley mosque has already become heated, with CAIR and other supporters casting opposition as bigotry while some residents have raised concerns about traffic, zoning, neighborhood character, and broader ideological issues — such as Sharia law — that oppresses many people of many backgrounds.

Wester urged Albuquerque residents to welcome the project with “goodwill,” writing, “A neighborhood that makes room for the prayers of many is stronger, more compassionate, and more reflective of the values we claim to uphold.”

But the archbishop’s statement now has the enthusiastic backing of CAIR — a group praised by the left as a civil rights organization, condemned by Texas officials as terror-linked, and long scrutinized for its alleged connections to Hamas-linked networks.

That raises a new question for New Mexico Catholics and North Valley residents alike: Why is an organization with CAIR’s record so eager to insert itself into Albuquerque’s mosque fight?

Terror-linked CAIR cheers Santa Fe archbishop’s support for ABQ mosque Read More »

NM Dems reject bill to stop congressional stock trading

8 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

All three of New Mexico’s Democrat members of the U.S. House voted against a bill to restrict congressional stock trading, even as public frustration grows over lawmakers profiting while in office.

The House passed H.R. 7008, the Stop Insider Trading Act, on July 22 by a vote of 232-198. Every voting Republican supported the bill, along with 13 Democrats and one independent. But New Mexico Reps. Teresa Leger Fernández, Melanie Stansbury, and Gabe Vasquez all voted no.

The legislation would bar members of Congress, their spouses, and dependent children from purchasing individual securities issued by publicly traded companies while the member is in office. It would also require members to file public notice before selling covered investments and impose penalties for violations, including a fee of $2,000 or 10% of the value of the covered investment, whichever is greater, along with forfeiture of any realized profit from an improper sale.

The bill now heads to the Senate.

Republicans framed the vote as a long-overdue ethics reform aimed at stopping lawmakers from using their positions, briefings, and access to inside information to benefit financially.

Committee on House Administration Chairman Bryan Steil, R-Wis., called the legislation “a major step forward for ethics reform on Capitol Hill.”

“It ensures no lawmaker can profit off of insider information,” Steil said. “I urge my Senate colleagues to quickly take it up and send it to President Trump’s desk.”

But most House Democrats opposed the final bill, claiming it did not go far enough and objecting to the inclusion of voter ID language. Critics on the left argued the bill would still allow lawmakers to keep existing holdings and sell them with notice.

That argument did not stop 13 House Democrats from crossing party lines and voting for the measure.

In New Mexico, the vote immediately became political ammunition.

Martin Zamora, the Republican challenger running in New Mexico’s 3rd Congressional District, blasted Leger Fernández for voting no while her own financial disclosures face scrutiny.

According to Zamora’s campaign, Leger Fernández’s net worth grew from $1.38 million when she took office in 2021 to $2.19 million in her most recent filing from 2024 — an increase of nearly 60%. Her disclosure for calendar year 2025 was legally due May 15, 2026, but Zamora’s campaign said she requested and received a 90-day extension, pushing her filing deadline to August 13.

Zamora called her vote “a clear signal of whose interests Washington insiders protect first.”

“Thirteen House Democrats crossed the aisle to vote for basic transparency and accountability. Teresa Leger Fernandez wasn’t one of them,” Zamora said. “New Mexicans are struggling to pay for groceries and gas, and their congresswoman just voted down a bipartisan bill that would stop members of Congress from trading on information the rest of us don’t have.”

“Meanwhile, her own net worth has grown by nearly 60 percent since she got to Washington, and her latest financial disclosure is delayed past the deadline,” he added. “New Mexico families deserve answers, not extensions.”

Zamora called on Leger Fernández to release her 2025 financial disclosure immediately rather than waiting until the extended deadline.

“If there’s nothing to hide, there’s no reason to wait until August,” Zamora said. “New Mexicans have a right to know whether their representative in Washington is working for them or for her own portfolio.”

Vasquez, who represents southern New Mexico’s competitive 2nd Congressional District, tried to have it both ways in a July 22 post on X.

“I support banning members of Congress from trading stocks and profiting off their positions of power, and I support commonsense voter ID requirements to keep our elections secure,” Vasquez wrote.

But he then attacked the bill itself.

“Unfortunately, this MAGA-led bill, H.R. 7008, does neither,” he claimed.

Vasquez’s statement came as he heads into another election year in one of the state’s most closely watched congressional districts. Critics are likely to see his position as election-year cover: claiming to support a stock-trading ban in theory while voting against the bill that actually passed the House.

The final roll call was clear. Republicans voted yes. A small group of Democrats voted yes. New Mexico’s House Democrats voted no.

For voters who believe members of Congress should not be able to trade on information unavailable to ordinary Americans, the vote gives them a simple question to ask: why did New Mexico’s Democrat delegation oppose even this step toward accountability?

NM Dems reject bill to stop congressional stock trading Read More »

1 2 3 4 5 6 … 251
Scroll to Top