News

Keller again sides with criminal aliens over citizens with extreme exec. order

36 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Democrat Albuquerque Mayor Tim Keller has signed a sweeping executive order that effectively cements the city’s status as a “sanctuary” for illegal immigrants, barring city employees and departments from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement in most circumstances. The move is being praised by far-left organizations and progressive city councilors — and sharply criticized by mayoral challenger Darren White, who called the action “reckless” and politically motivated.

Keller’s order, released Monday, claims to “protect immigrant rights,” framing it as a response to what he describes as “harmful federal policies,” including legislation like President Trump’s H.R. 1 — also known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill.” The order prohibits the Albuquerque Police and other departments from using city resources to assist in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations, including detentions, raids, or information sharing, unless legally required.

The executive order assigns oversight to the city’s Office of Equity and Inclusion and expands protocols to limit federal ICE access to city buildings and operations. City departments will now be required to report ICE activity to the mayor’s office and take steps to shield children and working families from immigration enforcement.

“We will not use our resources to support raids, detentions, or information-sharing that we are not legally required to do,” Keller said. “We will protect due process for all people living in our City.”

However, critics argue that Keller is going far beyond due process and prioritizing politics over public safety.

Former Bernalillo County Sheriff Darren White, who is running to unseat Keller in November’s mayoral election, wasted no time in denouncing the order.

“This is nothing more than Mayor Keller doubling down on his dangerous policy of providing sanctuary to illegal immigrants who have committed serious crimes, rather than prioritizing the safety and well-being of our law-abiding residents,” White said in a statement. “He’s veering further to the radical left, using fear-based rhetoric and divisive language to score political points while placing federal law enforcement officers in danger.”

The order builds on a 2018 resolution that first branded Albuquerque an “immigrant-friendly city,” and city officials are already signaling plans to go further. Councilors Joaquin Baca, Klarissa Peña, Nichole Rogers, and Tammy Fiebelkorn all pledged to introduce legislation in August to codify and expand protections for undocumented immigrants.

City leaders and activists behind the policy point to economic contributions from immigrants, citing statistics that claim immigrants account for $12 billion annually in economic activity statewide. Keller’s office and groups like El CENTRO de Igualdad y Derechos argue that immigration enforcement “destabilizes families” and “terrorizes local communities.”

However, those who advocate for the rule of law view the policy as dangerously naïve and out of step with federal law.

White, who led Bernalillo County’s largest law enforcement agency, argued Keller is actively undermining cooperation between city law enforcement and federal immigration authorities — a move that could have fatal consequences.

“This executive order sends the wrong message,” White added. “It signals that Albuquerque is open to lawlessness and illegal activity, and it undermines the hard-working men and women who are tasked with enforcing our nation’s laws.”

The order is already drawing national attention and may become a central issue in the mayoral race, especially as Albuquerque continues to grapple with rising crime and concerns about law enforcement resources being diverted for political activism.

Keller’s executive order took effect immediately. City council legislation seeking to embed its provisions into law is expected to be introduced after the July recess.

Keller again sides with criminal aliens over citizens with extreme exec. order Read More »

Stansbury scrambles to explain link to Ghislaine Maxwell amid public scrutiny

23 Comments / Editorial, New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Far-left Democrat U.S. Rep. Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico’s First District is scrambling to rewrite her own history after official documents linked her to a nonprofit once led by convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein.

The controversy began when the Piñon Post credibly and factually reported on a 2021 financial disclosure form filed by Stansbury during her campaign for Congress. The document, submitted on February 19, 2021, listed “Terramar Project – Woburn, MA” as one of her former employers.

That name and location match exactly with the TerraMar Project, a now-defunct nonprofit founded and led by Maxwell. The organization gained notoriety for its ties to Epstein and its sudden closure just days after his 2019 arrest on sex trafficking charges. Maxwell was later convicted for her role in trafficking and grooming underage girls.

In response, Stansbury’s team told the Santa Fe New Mexican amid questions to issue a statement dismissing the report as a “lie” and “100% false.” Her spokesperson, Caroline Sweeney, claimed the listing was due to a “computing error” by campaign staff who had “mistakenly clicked on an auto-populated field” when entering her financial information into the House system.

But public records and House ethics rules cast serious doubt on that explanation.

According to the official 2021 House Financial Disclosure Instruction Guide, filers must manually enter each employer when completing the form. There are no dropdowns or auto-filled fields that could “accidentally” insert “Terramar Project – Woburn, MA” into the record. 

“Filers must input their reportable information the first time… the system then retains this information for future filings,” the guide states.

Also, no other congressional candidate or individual required to file such a form has ever entered TerraMar in Woburn, Massachusetts before, making the story even more implausible.

Even more telling: Stansbury had already listed “Terramar Consulting Group – Santa Fe” correctly on a 2020 New Mexico state disclosure. That means she knew the correct employer name — and chose something else in her federal filing.

Only after the Rio Grande Foundation filed a public complaint linking the disclosure to Maxwell did Stansbury amend her form. On April 21, 2021, she quietly changed it to say “Terramar Consulting Group – Santa Fe, NM.” Then, in a 2022 disclosure, she listed a third variation: “Terramar, Inc.,” another Santa Fe entity, which had been incorporated and dissolved by Cristina Mormorunni — behind the “Terramar” entity in Santa Fe — and campaign donor to Stansbury.

Stansbury’s team alleges the Democrat U.S. representative helped with a project sponsored by the Hewlett Foundation, but no such report or documentation has any trace of Stansbury whatsoever that can be publicly identified.

Facts show that Stansbury’s evolving story doesn’t pass the smell test.

House ethics rules make clear that Stansbury is personally responsible for the accuracy of her filings — staff cannot be blamed for errors.

Until she provides documentation — such as contracts, pay stubs, or client letters — proving she worked exclusively for a local “Santa Fe” firm without any ties to Maxwell’s entity, the original disclosure stands as the most credible account of her consulting past.

For now, one thing is certain: the only person who connected Melanie Stansbury to Ghislaine Maxwell’s nonprofit was Melanie Stansbury herself.

Stansbury tells displaced Diné energy workers just to sell ‘your art or your wool’

Stansbury scrambles to explain link to Ghislaine Maxwell amid public scrutiny Read More »

Another Dem declares candidacy for lt. gov. nomination in crowded primary

5 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

In a political environment dominated by big-city progressives and career insiders, Jackie Lee Onsuarez is pitching himself as a rural, working-class alternative in the 2026 race for New Mexico lieutenant governor.

Onsuarez, 58, currently serves as a senior staff specialist at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a vital federal facility tied to New Mexico’s energy economy. He’s also nearing the end of his first term as mayor pro tem on the Loving Village Council, where he represents about 1,200 constituents — many of whom feel forgotten by Santa Fe elites.

“I’m an advocate for the people,” Onsuarez said in an interview with Source NM. “I bring to the executive branch a set of diversified skills that nobody has there.”

Despite his alignment with the Democrat Party, Onsuarez strikes a populist tone that sharply contrasts with the far-left progressives who dominate the Capitol. He’s running, he says, because “embedded Democrats and Republicans” have turned a blind eye to rural communities and practical concerns like infrastructure, health care, and crime.

His resume includes international experience working in chemical plant construction across Saudi Arabia, India, China, and the U.K., as well as a master’s degree in electrical engineering from the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology. He also served by gubernatorial appointment on the New Mexico Emergency Response Commission, adding emergency management credentials to his portfolio.

This makes him an unusual figure in a field dominated by left-wing politicians more interested in identity politics than the nuts and bolts of governance.

In fact, Onsuarez enters a crowded Democrat primary alongside two well-known far-left figures: current State Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard, who is term-limited, and State Sen. Harold Pope, a progressive from Albuquerque. Both are deeply entrenched in the Santa Fe political machine, and both have built careers by pushing policies that often alienate rural New Mexicans — particularly those tied to the oil and gas industry.

Onsuarez, by contrast, embraces his Southeast New Mexico roots. “I’m the Democrat that lives in New Mexic, where at least 35% of the revenues are generated for New Mexico’s general fund,” he said. “We rural New Mexicans need a seat at that table.”

That table, of course, is currently dominated by urban leftists pushing climate mandates and anti-industry policies — many of which threaten the economic livelihood of the very regions Onsuarez represents.

While he has not yet raised or spent campaign funds, Onsuarez says his experience in small-town government has equipped him to preside over the state Senate, where the lieutenant governor plays a key procedural role.

“I’ve written laws that I tried to introduce, but they didn’t get very far,” he said. “I’ve written a lot of ordinances, and I’ve worked closely with our legal department. I certainly have the expertise to be able to learn something — and with respect to presiding over the Senate, I have the skill set to do it.”

Onsuarez isn’t endorsing any gubernatorial candidate yet, distancing himself from the three leftist names in the Democrat race: Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, Bernalillo County DA Sam Bregman, and ex-Las Cruces Mayor Ken Miyagashima.

Meanwhile, the Republican field is also taking shape, with Rio Rancho Mayor Gregg Hull leading the GOP ticket for governor. Manuel Lardizabal is the only declared Republican running for lieutenant governor so far, though more conservatives are expected to enter the race.

Whether Onsuarez can survive a Democrat primary increasingly dominated by radical urban progressives remains to be seen — but his campaign may highlight growing fractures within the party between rural pragmatists and Santa Fe ideologues.

Another Dem declares candidacy for lt. gov. nomination in crowded primary Read More »

‘Think NM’: While doctors flee NM, radical group fights to keep crisis going

15 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

In a fiery new op-ed, Think New Mexico Executive Director Fred Nathan is taking aim at a secretive, left-wing dark money group accused of undermining desperately needed reforms to New Mexico’s collapsing health care system. The group, called “New Mexico Safety Over Profits” (NMSOP), is now the subject of a lawsuit from the New Mexico Ethics Commission for allegedly violating campaign finance laws by failing to disclose its donors while spending tens of thousands of dollars on efforts to kill medical malpractice reform.

At the center of the controversy is Senate Bill 176 — a bipartisan attempt led by Think New Mexico to modernize the state’s outdated and lopsided medical malpractice laws. These reforms aim to make New Mexico more hospitable to doctors and health care providers who are fleeing the state in alarming numbers. Between 2019 and 2024, New Mexico was the only state in the nation to lose physicians, while every other state saw increases.

Think New Mexico’s report identified the state’s uniquely hostile malpractice environment as a significant factor. Unlike other states, New Mexico has no cap on attorneys’ fees, no limit on punitive damages, and the lowest legal threshold in the nation for awarding those damages. “This statute is great for trial lawyers,” Nathan wrote, “but not so great for folks trying to find a doctor.”

According to investigative reporting from Searchlight New Mexico, NMSOP has close ties to the New Mexico Trial Lawyers Association, whose members have a direct financial interest in preserving the current system. Searchlight exposed a pattern of unethical tactics used by the group to deceive the public and silence reformers. Rather than disclose their funding sources as required by law, NMSOP told reporters, “We certainly will not be disclosing our donors.”

The Ethics Commission wasn’t buying it. It sued the group, stating plainly, “New Mexicans have a right to know who is funding lobbying campaigns.”

Now, in what appears to be a desperate smokescreen, NMSOP is launching political attacks on Think New Mexico — a nonpartisan think tank that has successfully championed reforms ranging from ending predatory lending to repealing the food tax. NMSOP claims Think New Mexico is doing the bidding of corporate health interests, citing two local independent foundations that provided grant funding but were originally seeded through the sale of health care companies years ago.

Nathan called the accusation misleading and hypocritical, noting that Think New Mexico is fully transparent about its donors and publishes its financials online every year. In contrast, NMSOP refuses to reveal even a single name behind its funding while spending large sums to protect the status quo.

The truth, according to Nathan, is that trial lawyers and their dark money allies are scared — and for good reason. SB 176 may have failed in committee by a razor-thin 5–4 vote, but it earned 24 bipartisan co-sponsors, and Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham backed reform in both her State of the State address and post-session remarks.

“The tide is turning,” Nathan wrote. “And the desperation of those trying to stop reform only proves how necessary it is.”

With New Mexico facing a health care access crisis, the question now isn’t who’s funding the reform effort — it’s why the groups fighting it are so determined to keep their own donors hidden.

‘Think NM’: While doctors flee NM, radical group fights to keep crisis going Read More »

Stansbury said she worked for Maxwell—Now she’s pointing fingers at Trump

17 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Far-left U.S. Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-NM), best known for her performative politics and online posturing, attempted to mock President Donald Trump this week by invoking the late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and a supposed “client list” that has fueled internet speculation. But Stansbury’s swipe at Trump immediately backfired, given her own troubling connection to Epstein’s inner circle.

In a viral post on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter), Stansbury shared a meme renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of Donald Trump is on the Epstein Client List.” She captioned the image with a smug, “Just going to leave this right here,” racking up over 44,000 views and a flurry of mixed reactions.

What the Democrat failed to mention, however, is that she herself reported that she once worked for an organization founded by none other than Epstein’s longtime confidante, convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell.

According to her official disclosure in 2021, Stansbury listed the TerraMar Project as a former employer — a nonprofit that was created and fronted by Maxwell under the guise of ocean conservation.

TerraMar wasn’t just any nonprofit. It was founded by Maxwell in 2012 and dissolved suddenly in July 2019, just six days after Epstein was arrested again on federal sex trafficking charges. Despite being promoted with TED Talks, UN speeches, and Clinton Global Initiative tie-ins, the organization gave zero dollars to any actual environmental programs between 2012 and 2017. IRS documents showed high legal fees, unpaid debts, and minimal legitimate activity, raising questions about what TerraMar actually did — and who it really served.

TerraMar logo, Wiki Commons.

The project’s unusually shallow infrastructure, financial irregularities, and sudden shutdown just six days after Epstein’s 2019 arrest — all of which have fueled speculation that TerraMar may have provided Maxwell and Epstein with a respectable public-facing platform to launder money, build elite contacts, or conceal elements of their sex trafficking operation.

Tax filings even revealed TerraMar owed Maxwell over half a million dollars personally when it shuttered. Meanwhile, the organization claimed lofty goals of “shared global ocean governance” but was widely criticized as being hollow — a PR front cloaked in environmental buzzwords.

Maxwell, who founded TerraMar and led it as president, was later convicted in 2021 on five counts related to the trafficking and sexual abuse of minors.

So while Stansbury attempts to score political points by erroneously tying Trump to Epstein, despite no connection whatsoever, and him directing U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to release whatever appropriate information she can, the far-left Democrat Stansbury might want to revisit her own résumé.

Her social media antics didn’t go unnoticed by New Mexicans. One commenter wrote, “You’re still tied with Gabe Vasquez for the worst Rep. in the history of our State — but this is still really funny!” Another sarcastically praised the post while ignoring the hypocrisy.

The bigger story here isn’t a meme — it’s that a sitting member of Congress, who once worked for an Epstein-linked entity led by a now-convicted trafficker, is trying to deflect attention by dragging President Trump into the narrative. If guilt by association is the standard, Stansbury might be staring into a mirror.

New Mexicans deserve better than cheap social media stunts. They deserve transparency, especially from politicians with ties to one of the most notorious abuse networks in modern history.

Stansbury refuses to eat crow at DOGE hearing after humiliating math fail

Stansbury said she worked for Maxwell—Now she’s pointing fingers at Trump Read More »

Radical activist admits: NM is the hub for child gender mutilation

29 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

A disturbing interview from a far-left activist is shedding new light on the coordinated efforts of radical organizations and individuals who aim to push irreversible transgender procedures on children, and New Mexico is at the center of this dangerous campaign.

Mandy Giles, founder of the extremist group Parents of Trans Youth, appeared at a protest in Houston this week defending the practice of transporting minors across state lines for so-called “gender-affirming care,” which often includes hormone injections, puberty blockers, and genital mutilation surgeries. In the interview, she confirmed that New Mexico—a state with virtually no restrictions on transgender procedures for minors—is one of the top destinations for these procedures.

“There’s not many surrounding states… the closest to us is New Mexico—to Albuquerque—which is a long way away,” Giles told the interviewer when asked where Texas families are going for such procedures. “A lot of families are finding care in Washington State, Oregon, Colorado, Massachusetts, New York…”

That shocking admission highlights how New Mexico, under its Democrat-controlled government, has become a magnet for irreversible, life-altering procedures on vulnerable children. Rather than protecting minors from exploitation, the state has become what critics rightly call a gender mutilation sanctuary—offering surgeries and cross-sex hormones without meaningful oversight, age limits, or parental accountability.

While Texas lawmakers have acted decisively to protect children from these irreversible harms—passing Senate Bill 14, which prohibits doctors from providing puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and transgender surgeries to minors—activists like Giles are working overtime to circumvent these safeguards.

Even more alarming, Giles admitted that nonprofits such as the Campaign for Southern Equality are now actively involved in helping families smuggle children across state lines for these procedures. “They provide navigational help for families to find those clinics and doctors and transportation help,” she said, also referencing financial “microgrants” that grease the wheels of this medically and ethically questionable process.

Giles’ own bio paints a picture of someone deeply embedded in the transgender advocacy machine. A past president of PFLAG Houston and an Equality Texas leadership graduate, she has testified multiple times in opposition to laws designed to protect children from radical gender ideology. Her organization, Parents of Trans Youth, openly promotes affirming minors’ confusion and fast-tracking them toward experimental medical interventions, using her status as a parent of “two nonbinary young adults” to influence other families.

Despite her claims of compassion, Giles is pushing an agenda that many see as deeply harmful and irreversible. The long-term effects of hormone therapies and transgender surgeries are still being studied, but countries like Sweden and the UK have already begun to reverse course, halting youth transition procedures due to mounting evidence of harm.

New Mexico’s role as a destination for these procedures deserves scrutiny. Why are Democrats in the state legislature not only tolerating but encouraging the trafficking of vulnerable minors into their state for irreversible medical experimentation? Why are New Mexico taxpayers footing the bill for policies that could leave a generation of children permanently scarred?

As Texas strengthens its laws to protect children from irreversible harm, New Mexico appears to be racing in the opposite direction—becoming a haven for out-of-state activists who believe ideology should triumph over biology, medical ethics, and common sense.

For the safety of children, this dangerous pipeline must be exposed and stopped.

Radical activist admits: NM is the hub for child gender mutilation Read More »

Pope and Garcia Richard race to the bottom in radical Democrat primary

15 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

The race for New Mexico’s next lieutenant governor is already shaping up to be another bruising Democrat slugfest, with two far-left figures vying for power: State Sen. Harold Pope and State Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard.

On Monday, Pope—an Albuquerque Democrat known for pushing fringe legislation—formally announced his candidacy for the state’s second-highest executive post. Though the news comes as little surprise—Pope had already filed a campaign committee—his campaign rollout confirms a broader attempt by far-left ideologues to entrench themselves deeper in New Mexico’s executive leadership.

Pope told Source New Mexico that he’s running to have a “full-time voice” in the executive branch, claiming he can do more “on the fourth floor” than as a legislator. But his record tells a different story.

Pope has repeatedly aligned with the most radical policies in Santa Fe. He pushed legislation to force sexual education standards onto children as young as 11, regardless of parental consent. He voted to funnel taxpayer-funded college tuition to illegal immigrants through House Bill 64. He backed a payroll tax scheme (Senate Bill 3) that would’ve slammed both small businesses and workers. And he supported legislation that would have imposed centralized housing mandates across the state and cemented extreme environmentalist policies that threaten New Mexico’s oil, gas, and agricultural sectors.

These are not the positions of a moderate or a reformer—they’re part of a nationalized left-wing agenda that is already bleeding New Mexico dry. It also doesn’t help that he jumped on TikTok to advocate for a violent MS-13 gang member, among a slew of other wild takes that have been fully archived by the Piñon Post and will surely be pure gold come the general election, if Pope wins the nomination. 

But Pope isn’t alone. His top Democrat opponent so far is Stephanie Garcia Richard, the scandal-prone Commissioner of Public Lands. Her tenure has been riddled with controversy, including repeated clashes with New Mexico ranchers, lease mismanagement, and failure to balance the state’s economic interests with environmental stewardship. Instead of maximizing returns for New Mexico’s public schools—one of her core responsibilities—Garcia Richard has pursued a rigid green agenda that has alienated key industries and rural communities alike.

Garcia Richard also grabbed headlines for trying to strip the New Mexico State Land Office of transparency and legislative oversight, drawing sharp criticism even from within her own party. Her long track record of pushing anti-development policies makes her a hard sell outside progressive strongholds like Santa Fe.

Also in the race is Jackie Lee Onsurez, a village councilor from Loving, and Republican Manuel Lardizabal, who previously ran for a state Senate seat in Albuquerque.

But the real battle—for now—is within the Democrat Party, where Pope and Garcia Richard are expected to clash in what is shaping up to be a bitter primary. Both represent the far-left flank of the party, and both come with glaring vulnerabilities. While Pope barely held onto his Senate seat in 2024, Garcia Richard continues to face scrutiny over her political decisions and failed stewardship of state lands as she continually jumps from office to office.

With a primary set for June 2, 2026, New Mexico voters will once again be asked to choose between competing versions of the same radical playbook—unless common-sense leadership steps in to break the cycle.

As the Democrat candidates trip over each other to race to the left, conservatives are watching closely. The 2026 election may be the best opportunity yet to finally reverse the state’s dangerous slide toward California-style policies that have already caused so much harm.

Pope and Garcia Richard race to the bottom in radical Democrat primary Read More »

Vasquez tells illegals how to evade ICE after refusing to condemn violent riots

26 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

U.S. Rep. Gabe Vasquez, who once branded himself a moderate, is now openly championing far-left positions on immigration enforcement, drawing sharp contrasts with other border-district Democrats who have avoided taking sides on the issue.

Vasquez, serving his second term in Congress representing southern New Mexico, condemned recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in Los Angeles, claiming the Trump administration is “transforming our streets into war zones.” He went a step further by voting against a House resolution condemning violent riots that erupted in response to those raids — riots that included Molotov cocktails being thrown at agents and patrol vehicles set ablaze.

Instead of distancing himself from the anti-ICE violence, Vasquez has actively encouraged resistance to immigration enforcement. His official congressional website instructs undocumented individuals that they “do not have to open the door” to federal agents and that they “do not have to share your immigration status or your place of birth.” He also promotes the idea that individuals “can report and document raids and arrests to share with attorneys and advocacy organizations.”

Vasquez’s advice comes in the wake of several reported attacks on ICE agents in cities such as Portland, Oregon, and McAllen, Texas.

His outspoken stance places him at odds with other vulnerable Democrats in border regions. Texas Reps. Vicente Gonzalez and Henry Cuellar, both representing districts along the southern border, remained silent on the ICE operations in Los Angeles. Cuellar even joined six fellow Democrats in voting to condemn the riots. In total, five Democrats facing tough re-election campaigns backed the resolution, which passed on June 27. Vasquez voted against it.

The New Mexico lawmaker also opposed the bipartisan Laken Riley Act, which mandates that illegal immigrants accused of violent crimes be detained without bond. Rather than shy away from his controversial vote, Vasquez celebrated it as an act of “courage.”

These radical positions stand in stark contrast to Vasquez’s campaign image. During his previous races, he promised to ensure “a safe and secure border.” He narrowly won re-election in 2024, despite prior revelations that he had used a racial slur in a threatening 2004 voicemail.

In 2020, Vasquez posted content supporting calls to abolish both ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection. One tweet he reposted claimed, “ICE is committing genocide.”

In another 2020 interview, where he appeared under a fake name and wore a mask, Vasquez called for the defunding of police. “It’s not just about defunding police, it’s about defunding a system that privileges white people over everyone else,” he said.

Vasquez’s office has not responded to media inquiries regarding his recent comments or votes. In contrast, he has actually jumped out of press conferences where he was confronted on his stance regarding the border.

‘Had to run’: Vasquez flees border wall question during press briefing

Vasquez tells illegals how to evade ICE after refusing to condemn violent riots Read More »

After Keller directs APD to shield criminal aliens, mayoral challenger fights back

22 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Albuquerque mayoral candidate Darren White has issued a fiery rebuke of Mayor Tim Keller’s latest move to shield illegal immigrants from federal enforcement, calling it a “reckless abuse of city resources” and demanding immediate federal scrutiny.

In a July 12 Facebook post, Keller announced a new policy directing the Albuquerque Police Department (APD) to answer public inquiries about the presence of federal immigration agents in the city.

“Our APD does not enforce immigration laws. But when something doesn’t feel right in your neighborhood, you deserve to know what’s going on,” Keller wrote. “That’s why we’ve created a new way to verify if federal immigration agents are operating in our city. You can now call APD directly to get answers.”

The post featured a group of activists holding a banner that read “Immigrant Friendly — Burque Strong,” surrounded by butterfly motifs — a well-known symbol of open-borders activism. Notably, several protestors in the photo held signs referencing Senate Bills 250 and 836, which include provisions tied to immigrant protections and limiting law enforcement collaboration with ICE.

But White — a former sheriff, police officer, and cabinet secretary for public safety — isn’t having it. In a formal letter sent to U.S. Attorney Ryan Ellison, White demanded a federal investigation into whether Keller’s directive violates any laws, particularly those pertaining to obstruction of justice or interference with federal duties.

“As stated in a public post by Mayor Keller, ‘You can now call APD directly to get answers’ regarding the presence of federal immigration agents,” White wrote. “This directive… risks compromising sensitive operations, places federal personnel in imminent danger, and could even endanger members of the public.” 

White emphasized that Keller’s policies are putting political ideology above public safety. “If Mayor Keller doesn’t want ICE making apprehensions in public, he can rescind the Sanctuary City law and allow ICE access to the Prisoner Transport Center,” he added. “That would be safer for law enforcement, the public, and even the criminals being apprehended.”

In a pointed section of the letter, White also called on the U.S. Attorney to publish the criminal histories of illegal immigrants arrested in recent ICE operations to dispel any illusions that these efforts are targeting innocents. “This will provide the public with the clarity necessary to avoid any confusion… confusion ironically exacerbated by a mayor demonizing federal law enforcement at every town hall he attends,” White said.

Keller’s latest “sanctuary hotline” is being slammed across social media, with many citizens expressing outrage. Comments under his post include: “Keller is pro-everything BUT America!” and “Don’t re-elect this Klown Tim.”

As crime surges and federal agents work to dismantle cartel-driven smuggling networks across New Mexico, White’s tough-on-crime approach is striking a chord with voters who are tired of radical policies that use taxpayer-funded police departments to protect lawbreakers.

“Mayor Keller is turning APD into a concierge service for illegal immigrants, not a law enforcement agency,” one voter commented.

With the mayoral race intensifying, White’s call for federal oversight may be a turning point, as New Mexicans decide whether to continue down Keller’s lawless path or return to a government that puts citizen safety first.

After Keller directs APD to shield criminal aliens, mayoral challenger fights back Read More »

‘Had to run’: Vasquez flees border wall question during press briefing

32 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Far-left Democrat U.S. Rep. Gabe Vasquez is once again refusing to answer whether he supports extending the southern border wall near Sunland Park—this time around Mount Cristo Rey, a revered religious site known for its iconic 29-foot statue of Jesus.

The area has been labeled by U.S. Customs and Border Protection as “a major human smuggling infiltration site for the cartels,” highlighting growing concern over national security and human trafficking. But Vasquez—who has long opposed border enforcement efforts—won’t say where he stands.

According to a recent Source New Mexico article, Vasquez declined to comment when first asked about the wall extension. Then, during a subsequent virtual press briefing with New Mexico’s congressional delegation, Vasquez abruptly left before addressing a question submitted by The Santa Fe New Mexican asking if he supported or opposed the Cristo Rey wall extension.

Vasquez excused his departure by saying he “had to run,” deferring to his communications director Delaney Wehn, who was “on the chat” to field further questions. However, when the newspaper followed up, Wehn did not respond. Even after a second attempt this week, Wehn simply replied: “Thanks for following up here. Apologies, no answers for you at this time.”

The silence is deafening—especially from a congressman representing a border district during a time of record-breaking illegal crossings and cartel violence.

Vasquez’s refusal to answer isn’t surprising given his radical record on border security. In 2022, Vasquez called the existing U.S.-Mexico border wall a “racist political stunt” and said it was “not who we are as a country.” He has previously argued that “barriers and walls” only serve to “divide communities and perpetuate racism,” even as Border Patrol agents in his district struggle to contain daily waves of illegal crossings, drug smuggling, and human trafficking.

He has also openly opposed Title 42, the Trump-era policy that allowed for swift deportation of illegal immigrants during the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead, Vasquez has advocated for expanded “pathways to citizenship” and broader asylum protections, aligning himself with the most extreme elements of the open-borders left.

Now, even as the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”—a comprehensive legislative package that includes border security investments and increased funding for immigration enforcement agents—is under national debate, Vasquez won’t say whether he supports any of its border provisions.

Vasquez’s unwillingness to take a stand—on either the Cristo Rey wall extension or the broader border funding—shows a troubling pattern of dodging responsibility while his constituents face the real consequences of his inaction. But since Vasquez’s previous statements speak volumes, it’s a sure bet Vasquez remains as radically open-borders as before.

With New Mexico communities overwhelmed by cross-border crime and federal agents stretched thin, Vasquez’s silence speaks volumes.

‘Had to run’: Vasquez flees border wall question during press briefing Read More »

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 … 241
Scroll to Top