Activists say quiet part out loud about NM’s anti-ICE agenda

A new article from far-left outlet Truthout is openly confirming what many suspected all along: New Mexico’s so-called “Immigrant Safety Act” was designed to obstruct federal immigration enforcement, cripple ICE detention capacity, and serve as a model for other blue states seeking to undermine deportation operations.

In the piece, titled “New Mexico Becomes the Latest State to End Cooperation With ICE Under New Law,” activists and legal architects behind the legislation admit that the law’s purpose is to interfere with President Donald Trump’s deportation agenda by cutting off detention space needed for removals.

Sophia Genovese, an attorney who worked on both the New Jersey and New Mexico campaigns, told Truthout plainly: “Ending local and state cooperation with ICE is an important way of throwing sand in the gears of the Trump administration’s mass deportation machine.”

She added the clearest admission of all: “There cannot be mass deportations without detention.”

That statement confirms the law was never merely about public safety or local control. It was crafted specifically to obstruct deportations by reducing ICE’s access to detention facilities in New Mexico.

Truthout’s reporting further shows New Mexico’s legislation is being celebrated nationally as a template for similar anti-ICE laws across the country.

“We see a tremendous upswelling of this type of legislation being proposed in different states across the country,” said Rebecca Sheff of the American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico, who helped draft the law.

Sheff said the current political climate is “a time to make the most of the political willingness to take bold action,” making clear activists see New Mexico as a launching pad for broader national efforts.

Truthout reports that comparable “Dignity, Not Detention” laws are already in place in California, New Jersey, Washington, Illinois, Colorado, and Maryland, while organizers in New York are actively pushing similar legislation. New Mexico is now being held up as the newest success story in that campaign.

The article also makes clear that New Mexico’s law is intended to force ICE out of existing detention contracts in counties like Torrance and Cibola.

“These agreements will no longer be legal,” Truthout states, noting the law requires public entities to terminate those contracts as soon as permitted.

That means New Mexico counties will lose detention-related jobs, revenue, and economic activity tied to those contracts—all while ICE simply shifts detainees elsewhere.

Rather than ending detention, the law pushes illegal immigrants into facilities in neighboring states such as Texas, where ICE maintains other detention infrastructure, including facilities like Camp East Montana. New Mexico loses the economic benefits while other states receive the detainees and federal dollars.

Truthout also reveals the ideological extremism driving the law.

One activist quoted in the piece described immigration detention as “literally kidnapping and disappearing folks into these systems.” Another said the goal is to “abolish immigration detention” altogether.

Those statements expose the broader agenda behind the legislation: not reform, but dismantlement of the immigration enforcement system itself.

The article further praises New Mexico for using state authority under the 10th Amendment to resist federal immigration enforcement and “withhold state involvement in ICE detention,” as Sheff put it.

In short, Truthout’s own reporting makes the purpose of New Mexico’s anti-ICE law unmistakable: the state is being used as a pawn in a national progressive campaign to obstruct deportations, dismantle ICE detention infrastructure, and export radical anti-enforcement policy to other states.

What supporters marketed as an “immigrant safety” bill is, by their own admission, a strategic effort to jam the machinery of federal immigration enforcement—while New Mexico counties and taxpayers bear the cost.