Piñon Post

Haaland brings national shame upon NM due to Epstein ties

26 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

New Mexico is once again in the national spotlight for all the wrong reasons after a bombshell report revealed that Democratic gubernatorial frontrunner Deb Haaland once flew on a private jet connected to disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

According to reporting by the New York Post, newly released emails show Haaland was among several passengers who traveled on the aircraft in 2014 while attending a meeting in Washington, D.C. At the time, Haaland was running for lieutenant governor as part of then–New Mexico Attorney General Gary King’s campaign.

The flight itself was reportedly chartered by King’s campaign, but emails uncovered in the reporting indicate that Epstein arranged access to the aircraft.

One email cited in the report allegedly asked Epstein about providing the plane for King’s travel, stating: “Please call Gary King when you have a moment… He said he was returning your call but also wanted to speak to you about possibly using your plane to get him from Santa Fe evening of Sept. 8 so he could make a breakfast in DC on Sept. 9.”

Flight documentation shows the aircraft was chartered by JEGE LLC, a company linked to Epstein and registered in the U.S. Virgin Islands, where Epstein maintained his infamous private island.

The revelation has sparked renewed scrutiny of New Mexico’s long and troubling connections to Epstein, whose activities in the state have been the subject of ongoing investigation.

Epstein, who pleaded guilty in 2008 to charges related to soliciting prostitution — including from a minor — later died in a New York jail cell in 2019 while awaiting federal sex trafficking charges.

Haaland’s campaign quickly sought to distance her from the disgraced financier, insisting she had no knowledge of the plane’s connection to Epstein.

“Deb never had any interaction with him and the way in which the plane was chartered was never communicated to her,” campaign spokesperson Hannah Menchhoff said in a statement to the New York Post. The spokesperson added that Haaland considers Epstein a “despicable predator” and supports investigations into crimes associated with him both in New Mexico and internationally.

Still, the story has raised uncomfortable questions for the candidate, who is currently leading in early polling for New Mexico’s 2026 gubernatorial race.

The controversy also draws renewed attention to Epstein’s extensive ties to the state, particularly through the Zorro Ranch property in Santa Fe County. The ranch was sold to Epstein in 1993 by the family of Gary King, whose father, former Governor Bruce King, owned the property before the sale.

State officials have recently reopened investigations into possible criminal activity connected to Epstein’s New Mexico estate.

Gary King has also addressed the matter publicly, saying his campaign — not he personally — handled the logistics of chartering the aircraft. He said he was unaware of the connection to Epstein at the time.

“If I had known in advance that the jet belonged to Epstein, I would have asked my campaign to charter with a different company,” King reportedly said.

King acknowledged meeting Epstein once in 2010 in Santa Fe but claimed the meeting occurred when Epstein offered condolences after the death of Bruce King.

While Haaland’s campaign maintains she had no knowledge of the aircraft’s connection to Epstein, the revelation has nonetheless placed New Mexico politics under an uncomfortable national microscope.

For a state still grappling with the legacy of Epstein’s activities within its borders, the resurfacing of these connections — particularly involving a major gubernatorial candidate — has reignited debate about accountability, transparency, and the lasting shadow of one of the most notorious criminal scandals in modern history.

With the race for governor heating up, the controversy is likely to remain a flashpoint as voters weigh the implications of New Mexico’s continued ties to the Epstein saga.

Haaland brings national shame upon NM due to Epstein ties Read More »

From landslide to photo finish: Tuesday elections shake up city halls across NM

11 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Some New Mexico voters headed to the polls Tuesday for a series of municipal elections across the state, delivering decisive victories in some cities, razor-thin margins in others, and at least one high-profile mayoral upset.

Española: Salazar Unseats First-Term Mayor

In Española, incumbent first-term Mayor John Ramon Vigil was defeated by former City Councilor Dennis Tim Salazar in a race that drew significantly higher turnout than previous municipal elections.

According to unofficial results, Salazar secured 860 votes, or 60.18%, compared to Vigil’s 569 votes, or 39.82%.

Earlier in the evening, unofficial tallies provided by the city clerk showed Salazar with a commanding lead. The Santa Fe New Mexican reported Salazar appeared poised to “handily unseat” Vigil as early numbers showed him leading comfortably over both Vigil and a write-in candidate.

By the time final unofficial numbers were reported, Salazar’s margin had widened into a decisive victory. Outside Española City Hall, Salazar celebrated with family members as supporters gathered to mark the win. Meanwhile, a solemn-looking Vigil was seen speaking quietly with friends and family outside one of the polling locations.

Municipal Judge Joseph Madrid also won reelection Tuesday.

Salazar, a former councilor, now returns to city leadership at a time when Española faces ongoing economic and public safety challenges. The upset marks a significant shift in leadership after just one term for Vigil.

Ruidoso: Crawford Survives by 23 Votes

In contrast to Española’s clear outcome, the mayoral race in Ruidoso came down to just 23 votes.

Incumbent Mayor Lynn Crawford narrowly defeated challenger Joshua Richardson, 720 votes (50.81%) to 697 votes (49.19%), according to unofficial results. All results remain pending canvass by the Lincoln County Commission.

Richardson reportedly led in election-day, in-person voting at the Ruidoso Convention Center. However, Crawford’s early-vote advantage — 263 to 155 — ultimately proved decisive, allowing the 63-year-old mayor to secure a third consecutive term.

Turnout was robust for a municipal election, with 1,435 ballots cast — approximately 27% of the village’s more than 5,000 eligible voters.

Voters also approved a $3 million General Obligation bond for water system repairs and improvements by a wide margin, 1,003 to 369.

In village council races, Everett Brophy led all candidates with 854 votes. Adam Sanchez and incumbent Darren Hooker also secured seats, while incumbent Joe Eby fell short.

Artesia: Youtsey Wins Close Mayoral Race

In Artesia, Mayor Pro Tem Jeffrey Youtsey won the mayor’s race, defeating challenger Terrance Todd in a tight contest.

Youtsey received 51% of the vote to Todd’s 49%, according to unofficial returns. He will replace outgoing Mayor Jonathan Henry, who currently serves as state representative for the area, and opted not to seek a second term.

Several city council races were also decided, including a narrow 50.4% to 49.5% win for Terry Hill in District 4. Results will be canvassed by the Eddy County Commission.

Rio Rancho: Runoff Ahead

In Rio Rancho, no candidate secured the required majority in a six-person mayoral contest, triggering a runoff election.

City Councilor Paul Wymer led the field with 6,174 votes (46%), followed by Alexandria Piland with 3,540 votes (26%). The two will face off April 14.

Wymer emphasized his development experience and infrastructure priorities during the campaign, while Piland focused on fiscal responsibility and stricter development standards. The winner will succeed outgoing Mayor Gregg Hull.

Incumbent Karissa Culbreath won reelection to the District 5 City Council seat, defeating challenger Calvin Ward.

Clovis: Incumbents Sweep

In Clovis, incumbents dominated city commission races. Megan A. Palla retained District 4 with 61.56% of the vote in the most competitive race. Debbie Zamora won District 3 with 63%, and Juan Garza held District 1 with nearly 80%.

Turnout was low, with just 844 voters participating — roughly 4% of eligible voters.

Elections Brought Change

From decisive upsets to razor-thin margins, New Mexico’s March 3 municipal elections reshaped leadership in several key cities while setting the stage for at least one high-stakes runoff in April.

From landslide to photo finish: Tuesday elections shake up city halls across NM Read More »

Where NM landed in the latest ‘Best States to Live’ rankings

16 Comments / New Mexico, News / By

According to WalletHub’s 2026 “Best States to Live In” study, New Mexico ranks dead last in the nation — a sobering distinction that underscores years of troubling trends in education, health, and public safety.

The annual analysis compares all 50 states across 51 separate indicators, including affordability, economic performance, education and health outcomes, quality of life, and safety. While some states perform strongly in certain categories and poorly in others, New Mexico’s overall placement at No. 50 signals broad, structural weaknesses that continue to drag down the state’s standing nationwide.

WalletHub assigns New Mexico an overall score of 39.68, the lowest in the country. The state’s weakest areas are education and health, where it ranks 48th, and safety, where it ranks 49th — nearly at the very bottom. Those figures reflect longstanding concerns about crime rates, health access, educational attainment, and student performance metrics.

While New Mexico’s economy ranks 33rd — closer to the middle of the pack — and its quality of life sits at 30th, those middling scores are not enough to offset deep problems in the areas that most directly impact daily life. Safety in particular weighs heavily in WalletHub’s methodology, and New Mexico’s near-bottom ranking in that category reflects persistent issues with violent crime and property crime that have plagued communities across the state.

Education and health metrics further compound the problem. Rankings in this category consider factors such as public school performance, high school graduation rates, access to medical care, and overall population health. New Mexico’s placement at 48th suggests that residents face significant disadvantages compared with most of the country when it comes to both schooling outcomes and healthcare access.

Even affordability — often cited as a relative advantage in lower-income states — does not provide New Mexico with a competitive edge. The state ranks 25th in affordability, squarely in the middle nationally. That means New Mexico does not enjoy the strong cost-of-living advantage seen in some other low-ranked states such as Alabama or Arkansas, both of which rank near the top for affordability despite struggling elsewhere.

Other states occupying the bottom tier include Louisiana (49th), Arkansas (48th), and Mississippi (47th). But New Mexico’s combination of low safety rankings and weak education and health outcomes ultimately pushes it to the very bottom of the list.

WalletHub’s findings highlight persistent regional and structural disparities across the United States. States that rank poorly often face overlapping challenges: limited economic opportunity, struggling public school systems, elevated crime rates, and health burdens such as higher rates of chronic disease. In New Mexico’s case, those factors converge in a way that leaves the state trailing every other state in overall livability.

Where a person lives affects nearly every aspect of life — income potential, public safety, educational opportunity, and even life expectancy. By those measures, WalletHub’s 2026 data paints a stark picture: New Mexico faces the steepest uphill climb in the country when it comes to creating a safe, healthy, and thriving environment for its residents.

For a state rich in culture, history, and natural beauty, the ranking serves as a sobering reminder that serious systemic issues remain unresolved — and that meaningful change will require confronting the root causes behind years of underperformance.

Where NM landed in the latest ‘Best States to Live’ rankings Read More »

Gaslighting NM: Dems claim legislative victory while crises crush families

9 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

An op-ed penned by Javier Martínez, Reena Szczepanski, Day Hochman-Vigil and Raymundo Lara and published in the Albuquerque Journal and the Los Alamos Reporter paints a glowing picture of the 2026 Legislative Session. But New Mexicans say the self-congratulatory tone ignores a glaring reality: meaningful crime reform once again died under Democrat control, while long-delayed fixes to New Mexico’s health care crisis came only after years of inaction.

“In January, House Democrats laid out plans to make life better and more affordable for New Mexico families,” the leadership wrote, gaslighting that “we have delivered on those promises and more.” They further claimed, “here in New Mexico we know how to get things done.”

Yet on public safety — an issue dominating headlines and deeply affecting communities statewide — many of the most substantive proposals never saw the light of day.

Several crime-fighting measures sponsored by Republicans, including Clovis Rep. Andrea Reeb, were referred to the House Consumer and Public Affairs Committee, widely viewed by critics as a legislative graveyard for tougher-on-crime policies. Bills that would have rolled back elements of the state’s controversial cashless bail system, imposed mandatory sentences for certain violent offenders, strengthened penalties for repeat violent felons, and addressed violent juvenile crime were effectively stalled.

Opponents argue that committee referrals were not accidental but strategic — ensuring politically inconvenient proposals never reached a full House vote. Measures aimed at ending so-called “catch and release” practices and holding violent offenders accountable were sidelined, even as Albuquerque and other communities continue to grapple with persistent violent crime rates.

Meanwhile, Democrat leadership touted “real progress on public safety this session with investments and legislation to address the root causes of crime.” But focusing primarily on long-term social programs, while rejecting immediate accountability reforms, leaves law enforcement officers and victims frustrated.

On health care, Democrats highlighted House Bill 99, sponsored by Christine Chandler and others (including nearly all House Republicans), saying it would “bring our laws in line with other states, improve the climate for providers and continue to protect patient safety.”

However, malpractice reform has been debated for years, with medical providers warning repeatedly that rising premiums and lawsuit risks were driving doctors out of New Mexico. Only after the state’s health care system faced severe provider shortages did leadership move to adjust the law — a move critics describe as reactive rather than proactive.

The op-ed also celebrated expanding the Health Care Affordability Fund, joining interstate compacts, and raising medical residency pay. Yet Republican lawmakers note that those steps followed years of warning signs about collapsing rural care networks and overwhelmed urban hospitals.

On immigration, Democrat leaders praised passage of the so-called “Immigrant Safety Act,” asserting it would “make our communities safer.” But removing cooperation agreements with federal immigration authorities will limit tools available to law enforcement in certain cases. It also will threaten to bankrupt Cibola, Otero, and Torrance counties, which have Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities — putting thousands of jobs on the line, millions in economic development being crushed, including gross receipts taxes, and bond ratings will be at stake. The long-term ramifications of the bill, which effectively won’t do anything but crush communities, will be felt by the far-left’s vote on this bill for decades.

The broader concern voiced by critics is not that Democrats passed no legislation, but that they controlled the agenda tightly — advancing far-left priorities and “anti-Trump” bills while systematically blocking stricter criminal accountability measures. When leadership claims, “Because here in New Mexico, we keep our promises,” New Mexicans also ask: promises to whom? The legislative session was surely a win for criminals while hard-working New Mexicans’ livelihoods remain in shambles.

With violent crime still a top voter concern and ongoing strain in the health care system, “real, pragmatic solutions” did not make it across the finish line during the session, despite claims from Democrat leadership.

Gaslighting NM: Dems claim legislative victory while crises crush families Read More »

Smuggling, assaults, and reentry cases: Inside this week’s border numbers

4 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Mexico released its weekly immigration and border crime enforcement statistics Friday, outlining a significant number of federal charges filed over the past week as part of ongoing border security operations in the state.

According to the report, in the one-week period ending February 27, 2026, federal prosecutors in New Mexico filed criminal charges against more than 220 individuals for immigration-related offenses. These prosecutions were carried out in coordination with the El Paso Sector of the U.S. Border Patrol, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) El Paso, and other federal, state, and county law enforcement agencies.

The breakdown of charges includes:

  • 72 individuals charged with Illegal Reentry After Deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
  • 10 individuals charged with Alien Smuggling under 8 U.S.C. § 1324.
  • 61 individuals charged with Illegal Entry under 8 U.S.C. § 1325.
  • 80 individuals charged with Illegal Entry, violation of a military security regulation (50 U.S.C. § 797), and Entering Military, Naval, or Coast Guard Property (18 U.S.C. § 1382). These cases stem from incidents occurring within the newly designated National Defense Area in New Mexico.

Federal officials noted that many of the defendants charged with illegal reentry had prior criminal convictions. Those prior offenses included fleeing the scene of an accident involving death or serious bodily injury, illegal firearm possession by a noncitizen, and prior immigration violations.

One case highlighted in this week’s report involved Jose Cuyuch De Paz, who was encountered by U.S. Border Patrol agents near 505 McNutt Road in Sunland Park after allegedly entering the United States unlawfully on foot. Authorities state that when agents attempted to detain him, De Paz fled into a residential neighborhood, scaling fences and running through backyards. A pursuing agent followed footprints before a fence gave way during the chase, causing both the agent and the suspect to fall. Prosecutors allege that De Paz kicked the agent multiple times during the struggle. A second agent arrived to assist, and De Paz was subdued and arrested. He now faces charges of illegal reentry and assault on a federal officer. Court filings indicate he has denied striking or kicking the agent.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office emphasized that protecting law enforcement personnel remains a central priority in border enforcement efforts. So far in Fiscal Year 2026, 18 El Paso Sector Border Patrol agents have been assaulted. That follows 88 reported assaults during Fiscal Year 2025. Federal authorities stated that U.S. Border Patrol is working closely with the FBI and federal prosecutors to pursue charges in assault cases in order to deter violence against officers operating along the border.

These prosecutions are part of a broader federal enforcement initiative known as Operation Take Back America, a Department of Justice effort aimed at combating illegal immigration, dismantling cartels and transnational criminal organizations, and targeting violent crime.

Under President Donald Trump’s administration, federal officials have identified border security and public safety as top priorities. In New Mexico, enhanced enforcement at both the border and within the interior of the district has led to arrests of individuals accused not only of immigration violations but also of more serious offenses, including human trafficking, sexual assault, and crimes against children, according to federal authorities.

The District of New Mexico covers all 33 counties in the state and includes approximately 180 miles of international border with Mexico. Assistant U.S. Attorneys based in Albuquerque and Las Cruces handle immigration-related prosecutions in coordination with federal, state, and local partners.

Officials noted that the weekly figures reflect only criminal cases filed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and do not include individuals processed through civil or administrative immigration proceedings.

Smuggling, assaults, and reentry cases: Inside this week’s border numbers Read More »

Second court tosses residency challenge against GOP governor hopeful

8 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

A Santa Fe district judge on Friday dismissed a legal challenge seeking to remove Republican gubernatorial candidate Duke Rodriguez from the 2026 primary ballot, marking the second court ruling this week rejecting claims about his eligibility.

State District Judge Matthew Wilson determined that the most recent complaint, filed by fellow Republican candidate James Ellison, was not submitted within the required procedural timeline. Under state law, plaintiffs seeking expedited review in election-related cases must request a hearing within 10 days. The court found that requirement had not been met.

Ellison, a former Public Regulation Commissioner who is also pursuing the Republican nomination for governor, filed the lawsuit without legal representation. He argued that Rodriguez did not satisfy New Mexico’s constitutional residency requirements and further alleged that the Secretary of State’s Office failed to properly verify those qualifications. Specifically, the complaint questioned whether Rodriguez had maintained continuous voter registration in New Mexico for the five years required under the state constitution.

Duke Rodriguez

Following the ruling, Ellison acknowledged that he was unfamiliar with certain procedural deadlines when filing the case.

“I did file this case on my own without representation, and I simply was not aware of all the timelines and requirements,” Ellison said. He indicated he is reviewing whether to appeal the dismissal to the New Mexico Supreme Court.

Rodriguez’s attorney, former state Sen. Jacob Candelaria, argued that the complaint failed on procedural grounds and described the litigation as politically motivated. Candelaria noted that courts have now twice dismissed residency-based challenges to Rodriguez’s candidacy within the same week.

Earlier in the week, a district judge in Aztec rejected a separate lawsuit filed by former Bernalillo County Republican Party Chair John Rockwell and Navajo Dam resident James Maes. That complaint similarly alleged that Rodriguez did not meet the residency requirements outlined in the New Mexico Constitution. In that case, Rodriguez’s legal team argued that constitutional residency qualifications apply to holding office rather than appearing on the ballot.

According to the New Mexico Secretary of State’s Office, the state constitution requires candidates for governor to have been continuously registered to vote in New Mexico for five years and to have maintained residence in the state during that period. A spokesperson previously confirmed that Rodriguez initially registered to vote in New Mexico in 2010. His registration was canceled in 2021 during a routine voter list maintenance process conducted in compliance with the federal National Voter Registration Act. He re-registered to vote in New Mexico on Jan. 14, 2025.

Court filings in prior litigation have referenced Rodriguez describing himself at times as a resident of Scottsdale, Arizona. Public records also indicate that in past years, certain court correspondence sent to an Arizona address associated with Rodriguez was returned as undeliverable. Those details formed part of the arguments raised by challengers questioning his eligibility.

Ellison’s candidacy comes after a series of party registration changes in recent years. In August 2022, he changed his voter registration from Democrat to Decline-To-State. At the time, state law required that no more than two members of the three-person Public Regulation Commission be affiliated with the same political party. Then-Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham appointed Ellison to the PRC in January 2023.

James Ellison

According to public voter registration records, Ellison registered as a Republican in February 2025. He had previously stated in a January 2026 interview with the Santa Fe New Mexican, “Let me say this: I did not leave the Democrat Party.”

Rodriguez, a former New Mexico cabinet secretary and current cannabis industry executive, announced his candidacy for governor in December. He is one of several Republicans seeking the party’s nomination. Other declared candidates include Ellison, state Sen. Steve Lanier of Aztec, Rio Rancho Mayor Gregg Hull, and former New Mexico Judicial Standards Commission Chair Doug Turner.

The Republican primary election is scheduled for June 2. Additional legal action remains possible if Ellison or others pursue appeals.

Second court tosses residency challenge against GOP governor hopeful Read More »

Leger Fernandez embarrasses NM with bonkers claim about popular policy

38 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Far-left New Mexico Democrat Teresa Leger Fernandez is drawing sharp criticism after making what many are calling an insane claim about voter ID laws, asserting that Republicans support voter identification requirements because “they don’t want women to vote… they don’t want working families to vote.”

The comment, which circulated widely on social media this week, immediately sparked backlash from critics who say the statement is not only inflammatory but deeply patronizing. The underlying implication, they argue, is that women and working families are somehow incapable of obtaining or presenting a government-issued ID — a requirement that already exists for countless everyday activities.

In New Mexico, that message appears to be wildly out of step with voters. A KOB 4 poll published February 4, 2026, found that 93% of New Mexicans support requiring voter ID. That level of agreement cuts across demographic and partisan lines, making the issue one of the least controversial election integrity measures in the state.

National data mirrors that overwhelming support.

According to the Pew Research Center, 83% of Americans favor requiring all voters to show a government-issued photo ID to vote. That includes 95% of Republicans and 71% of Democrats. Just 16% oppose such requirements.

Similarly, Gallup reports that 84% of Americans support photo ID requirements, including 98% of Republicans, 84% of independents, and 67% of Democrats. In a separate question, 83% said they support requiring proof of citizenship when registering to vote for the first time.

Even mainstream media outlets have acknowledged the broad consensus. CNN’s Harry Enten recently stated, “The bottom line is this: Voter ID is NOT controversial in this country. A photo ID to vote is NOT controversial in this country. It is not controversial by party and it is not controversial by race. The vast majority of Americans agree.” NBC Nightly News anchor Tom Llamas similarly noted that while voter ID enjoys wide public support, most Democrats on Capitol Hill continue to oppose it.

Globally, voter identification is hardly unusual. Countries like Mexico require robust voter ID systems. Mexico instituted a secure voter credential following election controversies in the 1990s to strengthen public trust in elections. Today, Mexico’s voter ID card is considered one of the most secure forms of identification in the country and is widely accepted for banking and official transactions.

The United States has identification requirements for boarding airplanes, purchasing alcohol, entering federal buildings, and countless other routine activities. Critics argue it strains credibility to suggest that requiring ID to vote — arguably one of the most important civic acts — is somehow discriminatory.

Supporters also point to federal proposals like the SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act), which aims to ensure that only U.S. citizens are registered to vote in federal elections by requiring documentary proof of citizenship. Proponents say the measure strengthens election integrity and public confidence without restricting lawful voters.

The broader debate raises a pointed question: If over 80% — and in New Mexico’s case, over 90% — of voters support voter ID, why are Democratic leaders framing it as voter suppression?

Critics of Leger Fernandez argue her comments insult the very constituencies she claims to defend. Women, working parents, and minority voters across New Mexico routinely present ID to cash checks, pick up prescriptions, or verify identity for employment. To suggest they cannot do the same at a polling place, opponents say, is not advocacy — it is condescension.

As voter ID continues to receive overwhelming bipartisan support nationwide, statements like these may resonate more in Washington activist circles than with everyday New Mexicans who overwhelmingly favor commonsense election safeguards.

Leger Fernandez embarrasses NM with bonkers claim about popular policy Read More »

Violent incidents shake NM: BernCo sergeant dead, NMSP officer shot at

17 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

A tragic Monday unfolded across New Mexico as two separate law enforcement incidents shook communities from Albuquerque to Fort Sumner — including the heartbreaking line-of-duty death of a veteran sergeant with the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office.

Line-of-Duty Death on I-40

The Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office confirmed late Monday evening that one of its sergeants was killed in the line of duty following a traffic stop along Interstate 40 near Carnuel.

“The Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office is heartbroken to confirm one of our sergeants was killed in the line of duty this evening,” the agency said in a statement. “We ask for prayers for the sergeant’s family, loved ones, and our agency during this unimaginable loss. Please allow space for the family to be notified and grieve. Verified updates will be shared later this evening through official BCSO channels.”

BCSO released the name of the fallen sergeant, Michael Shlattman, who was hired in 2012, being promoted to sergeant on July 13, 2024. Shlattman was involved in many assignments, including as a detective in Special Investigations and Auto Theft, as well as a task force officer with the U.S. Marshals Service and the Drug Enforcement Administration, according to KOB 4.

The Sheriff’s Office noted, “On the evening of February 23, 2026, just before 5:00 p.m., Sergeant Schlattman called over the radio to advise he was conducting a traffic stop. While he was outside the vehicle, a semi truck struck the rear of his department issued vehicle, ultimately pinning him beneath. Sergeant Schlattman died on scene as a result of his injuries.”

Earlier in the evening, reporters from KOB 4 relayed breaking developments from the scene. Reporter Tessa Mentus posted that all lanes of I-40 between Tramway and Carnuel were shut down as deputies responded to what officials initially described only as a situation involving a deputy during a traffic stop.

Witnesses at the scene told KOB 4 that a semi-truck crashed into the deputy while the sergeant was conducting the stop. Authorities had not confirmed additional details immediately, nor whether others were injured. Deputies emphasized there was no ongoing threat to the public.

Traffic in the Albuquerque metro area ground to a halt for hours, with major congestion reported on Juan Tabo, Tramway, and Central Avenue as drivers were rerouted around the closure.

“This is every agency’s worst nightmare, and tonight it is ours,” said Sheriff John Allen. “Sergeant Schlattman was a servant leader and a protector in the truest sense. He was the kind of supervisor who never asked a deputy to do something he would not do himself. Our hearts are broken, and we are asking our community to carry this family, and this agency, in your prayers.”

Sergeant Schlattman, BCSO

The New Mexico State Police issued a statement offering support to BCSO.

“We are deeply saddened to learn of the line-of-duty death of a Sergeant with the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office. The men and women of the New Mexico State Police stand shoulder to shoulder with BCSO during this unimaginable time. We pray for strength and peace for the deputy’s family and for every member of the agency grieving this tremendous loss.”

Second Incident: Officer Shot At Near Fort Sumner

In a separate and alarming incident Monday, New Mexico State Police announced they are actively searching for a man and woman who allegedly shot at an officer during a traffic stop near U.S. 285 at milepost 185.

According to NMSP, the officer involved in that incident is okay. However, authorities are warning residents in and around the Fort Sumner area to remain indoors and lock their doors while law enforcement conducts an active search.

Officials described the suspects as traveling in a gray Kia bearing Texas license plate XMX8165. “Do not approach. Call 911 immediately if seen,” the agency said. Officers are actively searching for the male suspect pictured in NMSP’s alert and his female accomplice.

Agents have identified the female suspect as Makaela Johnson, who was accompanying the male suspect. Johnson has an outstanding warrant for the following charges:

• Conspiracy to Commit First-Degree Murder

• Conspiracy to Commit Aggravated Assault Upon a Peace Officer with a Deadly Weapon

• Conspiracy to Commit Armed Robbery

• Harboring a Felon

• Receiving or Transferring a Stolen Motor Vehicle

• Escape from a Peace Officer

• Larceny

A photo of the suspected male assailant is pictured:

New Mexico State Police

The back-to-back incidents have left many New Mexicans shaken, underscoring the dangers law enforcement officers face daily.

Political Leaders Respond

Republican Party of New Mexico Chairwoman Amy Barela issued a statement mourning the fallen sergeant and condemning violence against law enforcement.

“We are deeply saddened to learn of the line-of-duty death of a sergeant with the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Department,” Barela wrote, adding, “We pray for strength and peace for the sergeant’s family and for every member of the sheriff’s department as well as surrounding law enforcement agencies grieving this tremendous loss.”

As investigations continue in both incidents, communities across the state are left mourning, praying, and waiting for further updates — reminded once again of the profound sacrifices made by those who serve in law enforcement.

Violent incidents shake NM: BernCo sergeant dead, NMSP officer shot at Read More »

Gun bills dead, ICE facilities shuttered: Inside the most divisive NM session yet

6 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

The 2026 New Mexico Legislative Session concluded with a sharp partisan divide over public safety, taxes, healthcare, immigration policy, and government expansion. While lawmakers advanced several significant measures, dozens of high-profile proposals were defeated, leaving both sides claiming victories and frustrations.

Key Measures That Passed

Among the most notable bipartisan wins was HB80, which strengthens the state’s Oil and Gas Reclamation Fund. The bill increases dedicated revenue for plugging abandoned wells, accelerates land restoration, and requires annual transparency reporting. Supporters framed the measure as a fiscally responsible way to protect taxpayers from footing the bill for environmental cleanup while maintaining energy production jobs.

Healthcare reforms also featured prominently. HB99 modernized New Mexico’s Medical Malpractice Act by clarifying liability standards and limiting the “stacking” of damage awards when multiple providers are involved. Lawmakers argued the reform would help stabilize malpractice insurance costs and retain physicians in the state. Additionally, SB1 enacted the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact, allowing qualified out-of-state doctors to receive expedited licensure in New Mexico — a move aimed at addressing persistent provider shortages, particularly in rural areas.

Public safety legislation included HB61, which increases penalties for aggravated battery against peace officers by elevating certain offenses to second-degree felonies. Lawmakers said the bill strengthens protections for law enforcement personnel.

The House also adopted HR1, creating a bipartisan investigative committee with subpoena power to examine unanswered questions surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s activities at Zorro Ranch and the response of state and local agencies.

Major Bills That Were Defeated

Several controversial measures were halted this session. SB17, dubbed the “Stop Illegal Gun Trade Act,” failed after facing opposition over new regulations on firearm dealers, expanded reporting mandates, and compliance requirements. Opponents argued the bill would burden lawful businesses without targeting criminals.

Similarly, HJR3, a proposed constitutional amendment establishing enforceable environmental rights, was defeated amid concerns that its broad language could trigger extensive litigation and regulatory challenges.

In the area of crime reform, nearly 25 Republican-backed proposals were introduced addressing fentanyl trafficking, repeat offenders, competency procedures, and expanded victim reparations. Most did not advance out of committee.

Tax reform efforts also stalled. Proposals included eliminating state income tax on tips, reducing taxes on overtime and Social Security income, expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit, and creating credits for foster parents and caregivers. None of the comprehensive package reached final passage.

Housing affordability measures — including zero-percent down loans for first-time homebuyers and restrictions on corporate home purchases — also failed to advance.

Controversial Measures That Passed

Democrats advanced several major initiatives that sparked debate.

SB241 expands the state’s childcare assistance system and broadens eligibility, raising concerns among critics about potential oversight challenges and long-term fiscal sustainability.

HB9 restricts public bodies from entering into federal immigration detention agreements, while HB124 establishes a “New Americans Division” within the Workforce Solutions Department.

SB30 repeals abortion reporting requirements previously codified in state law, eliminating certain public health data collection mandates.

Election policy changes came through SB264, which prohibits armed federal personnel from being present at polling locations within 28 days of an election.

Finally, HJR5 advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow legislators to receive a salary of up to $70,000 annually, pending voter approval.

A Session Marked by Division

The 2026 session reflected deep ideological differences over crime policy, taxation, healthcare access, immigration enforcement, election procedures, and the proper scope of government. While lawmakers secured progress in select areas — particularly healthcare licensing reform and energy reclamation — many high-profile initiatives on both sides stalled.

As the legislature adjourned, both parties signaled that these unresolved debates will likely return in future sessions, ensuring that the policy battles of 2026 are far from over. It is also unclear what Democrat Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham will sign or veto, or if she may call the Legislature back in for a special session.

Gun bills dead, ICE facilities shuttered: Inside the most divisive NM session yet Read More »

Democrats’ gun grab collapses as major anti-2A bills go down in flames

17 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

In the final stretch of New Mexico’s legislative session, two sweeping gun control measures championed by progressive Democrats have effectively collapsed — a major victory for New Mexicans’ Second Amendment rights.

Senate Bill 17, the so-called “Stop Illegal Gun Trade and Extremely Dangerous Weapons Act,” was rolled indefinitely in the House Judiciary Committee, halting what critics described as one of the most aggressive gun control packages ever introduced in New Mexico. Meanwhile, Senate Bill 261, which sought to dramatically expand so-called “gun-free zones” around polling places and ballot drop boxes, failed to advance out of the House Government, Elections and Indian Affairs Committee after Ranking Member Rep. John Block forcefully exposed what he called “massive holes” in the legislation.

According to reporting from the Santa Fe New Mexican, the bill’s sponsors admitted the bill’s effective death, with state Sen. Debbie O’Malley telling the outlet, “There’s not enough time to hear it again.”

With time running out in the session, Democrats were unable to muster the momentum needed to ram the bills through — despite heavy pressure from national gun control groups. Pro-gun groups, lawmakers like Rep. Stefani Lord (R-Sandia Park), concerned citizens, and others were instrumental in the death of the radical bill — described the most far-reaching anti-gun measure in the entire country.

SB 17: Sweeping Ban and Registry Scheme Halted

SB 17 would have imposed broad prohibitions on commonly owned gas-operated semi-automatic firearms and standard-capacity magazines — firearms that are overwhelmingly used for lawful purposes including self-defense, sport shooting, and hunting. Opponents argued the bill directly conflicted with the U.S. Supreme Court’s “common use” standard under the Second Amendment.

Beyond firearm bans, SB 17 layered on costly “site hardening” mandates for federally licensed firearm dealers, many of whom are small business owners already subject to extensive ATF regulation. The bill also attempted to create mechanisms critics warned could function as a de facto state gun registry — raising serious constitutional concerns about commandeering federal records and creating conflicts with federal law.

Perhaps most alarming to opponents was a provision forcing gun dealers to submit annual certifications under threat of felony charges for technical paperwork errors. Critics characterized this as a “zero tolerance trap” that would punish law-abiding retailers for minor administrative mistakes while doing nothing to deter violent criminals. Data cited during debate indicated retail theft accounts for a tiny fraction of crime guns, undermining the bill’s stated premise.

Ultimately, SB 17 stalled and was rolled indefinitely in House Judiciary — effectively killing it for the session.

SB 261: Expanded Gun-Free Zones Defeated

SB 261 attempted to transform polling places and ballot drop boxes into expanded gun-free zones by creating new 100-foot and 50-foot no-carry buffers. The legislation would have stripped existing exemptions for concealed handgun license holders — disarming thousands of law-abiding citizens the moment they stepped near a polling entrance.

More troubling, critics warned the bill jeopardized public safety by restricting law enforcement’s authority. Under SB 261, officers would have been required to be “requested” by an election official to carry within certain zones — replacing their general authority to act in the line of duty with a bureaucratic permission structure.

During its hearing in House Government, Rep. John Block aggressively questioned the bill’s language and consequences. He argued it would create confusion for responding officers, expose citizens to petty misdemeanor charges for carrying even non-functional firearm components such as frames or receivers, and potentially delay emergency response in volatile situations.

Block warned that hamstringing police authority around polling locations could have the opposite of the intended effect — undermining security rather than enhancing it. His line of questioning exposed what critics described as sloppy drafting and unintended consequences, ultimately contributing to the bill being rolled without a vote.

A Major Win for Gun Owners

With both SB 17 and SB 261 now effectively dead, gun owners and constitutional advocates are celebrating what they view as a critical firewall against sweeping restrictions.

As the session closes, the failure of these measures underscores a broader reality: even in a Democrat-controlled Legislature, radical gun control proposals face steep resistance when constitutional scrutiny, public safety concerns, and procedural accountability are brought to bear.

For now, New Mexico’s law-abiding gun owners retain their rights — and lawmakers who attempted to curtail them will likely face continued pushback from constituents in future sessions.

Democrats’ gun grab collapses as major anti-2A bills go down in flames Read More »

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 … 100
Scroll to Top