News

Santa Fe liberals panic as Curry County, ICE make power move

13 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Curry County, New Mexico, has become the first law enforcement agency in the state to enter into a formal partnership with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), taking a bold and much-needed stand in support of border security and the rule of law. Under a May 9 agreement, the Curry County Sheriff’s Office will participate in the federal Warrant Service Officer (WSO) program, allowing specially trained county jail staff to execute ICE-issued administrative immigration warrants.

This partnership, signed by Sheriff Mike Brockett and acting ICE Director Todd Lyons, marks a significant step forward in local-federal collaboration to remove criminal illegal aliens from communities. It comes at a time when open-borders rhetoric dominates New Mexico politics, and some progressive municipalities work actively to shield illegal immigrants from immigration enforcement.

“While our office routinely serves warrants on behalf of other law enforcement agencies, this specific agreement with [the Department of Homeland Security] is new,” Brockett explained. “Participating in the [WSO model] assists DHS in prioritizing the removal of noncitizens who pose a threat to our community due to their criminal behavior.”

Brockett emphasized that the agreement applies strictly within the county jail and actually reduces the need for ICE to conduct enforcement operations in the broader community. “Our participation in the program is limited to the confines of our jail and reduces the need for ICE to conduct arrests within the community,” he said, calling it a “common-sense tool.”

This partnership is a direct rebuke to the left-wing policies pushed by Attorney General Raúl Torrez and others in Santa Fe, who have warned against cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Torrez’s office issued a cautionary memo earlier this year, warning of increased costs and alleged erosion of community trust under such agreements.

But Brockett disagreed. “I disagree with the NM DOJ on their perspective regarding 287(g) programs,” he wrote, referencing the legal framework that allows for such cooperation between federal and local law enforcement. This framework was revived and strengthened under President Donald Trump’s renewed commitment to secure the southern border and enforce immigration law.

Curry County is participating in the lightest of the three 287(g) models, which allows local officers to assist ICE with warrant service and custody transfers — a narrow and practical form of assistance that enhances public safety without burdening officers with full immigration enforcement responsibilities.

Still, the far-left is up in arms. The ACLU’s Becca Sheff accused Curry County of choosing “politics over people” and criticized the agreement’s initial lack of publicity, despite it being listed on ICE’s database of pending agreements.

In reality, the outrage from leftist activists and politicians is about maintaining New Mexico’s sanctuary stronghold, which includes counties like Santa Fe, Doña Ana, and Bernalillo, all of which have passed resolutions limiting cooperation with ICE. These sanctuary policies have directly undermined public safety and shielded dangerous criminals from removal.

A prior ICE agreement with the New Mexico Corrections Department in 2007 authorized prison staff to engage in immigration enforcement, though the agency says it has no current plans to revive that effort.

Despite political pressure, Curry County is prioritizing safety and standing firm in its resolve. With over 600 active ICE-local partnerships nationwide, Curry County is now part of a growing network committed to restoring law and order in the wake of the Biden administration’s catastrophic border policies. President Trump’s leadership has revitalized these partnerships and empowered local agencies to act.

Their move is a model for other counties in New Mexico that are tired of being told to ignore federal law while illegal aliens with criminal records are released back into their neighborhoods.

Santa Fe liberals panic as Curry County, ICE make power move Read More »

Leger Fernandez makes spectacularly dumb claim about Biden’s border

30 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

In a stunning display of denialism during a June 3 U.S. House Rules Committee hearing, far-left Democrat Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez (NM-03) attempted to rewrite history, declaring, “But I do think that it is important that we stay rooted in fact. And the reality is there were no open borders during Biden.”

The comment quickly ignited a firestorm of criticism from Republicans, border security advocates, and anyone familiar with the reality of America’s recent border crisis.

Ben Petersen of the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) rebuked the statement on X, writing:

“Record-breaking MILLIONS of illegal immigrant crossings, overwhelmed border towns & cartel criminals running wild say otherwise.”

Leger Fernandez’s claim is not only false—it’s blatantly contradicted by government data and the lived experiences of border state residents. During Joe Biden’s term from 2021 to early 2025, the United States suffered the worst border crisis in modern history, marked by record-shattering numbers of illegal border crossings.

According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), more than 7.8 million illegal alien encounters occurred under Biden’s watch—the highest ever recorded in a comparable timeframe. This doesn’t even account for those who were not encountered or those who got away, estimated to be far exceeding a grand total of ten million illegal aliens who lawlessly flooded into the country. Fiscal Year 2022 alone saw a jaw-dropping 2.76 million encounters, and the crisis only intensified until President Donald J. Trump returned to office in January 2025.

Since Trump’s return, the border has undergone a dramatic turnaround. Reinstating policies like Remain in Mexico, expanding deportations, and authorizing the completion of the border wall, President Trump has overseen a 95% drop in illegal crossings compared to the same period the previous year, according to the Department of Homeland Security. Some immigration analysts, including those at the Center for Immigration Studies, have even noted that the U.S. is now experiencing the lowest levels of illegal crossings in decades—if not ever.

This resurgence of enforcement has also disrupted cartel operations and slowed the flow of fentanyl and human trafficking across the border, clear proof that secure borders save lives.

Compare that to the Biden years, when the administration dismantled successful Trump-era policies on Day One, ended Title 42, and effectively adopted a de facto open borders policy. The result was predictable: overwhelmed border towns, surging crime, and lives lost at the hands of illegal aliens who should never have been released into the country.

One such victim was 22-year-old Kayla Hamilton, who was raped and murdered by an MS-13 gang member allowed to enter illegally and placed into a resettlement program.

Tren de Aragua gang members from Venezuela even took over apartment complexes and terrorized residents in places such as Aurora, Colorado. Mt. Cristo Rey was also conquered by cartel smugglers under Biden’s reign. 

Leger Fernandez’s desperate attempt to shield the Biden administration from accountability isn’t just dishonest—it’s dangerous. As a representative from a border state, her refusal to acknowledge the facts betrays her constituents and undermines the safety of all Americans. Her actions, along with those of her U.S. House colleagues, Melanie Stansbury and Gabe Vasquez from the New Mexico delegation, to shield illegal aliens from accountability, also speak volumes. Vasquez represents the borderlands of southern New Mexico, where he faces a tough reelection.

Thanks to President Trump, the border is finally being secured once again—but voters should remember who helped create the crisis in the first place.

Leger Fernandez makes spectacularly dumb claim about Biden’s border Read More »

Fourth candidate likely to join crowded Dem primary for governor

9 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Lt. Gov. Howie Morales, a two-term Democrat under current far-left Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, known more for his roots in Silver City than for leading statewide, is expected to announce this week whether he will jump into the 2026 gubernatorial race or seek a different political lifeline: the presidency of Western New Mexico University, which is still reeling from a multi-million-dollar severance scandal.

Morales, 52, told the Santa Fe New Mexican that he wasn’t leaning toward a run for governor until he received “an outpouring of encouragement” from supporters. “The calls coming in really made me second-guess the way I was leaning,” he said Tuesday. Morales plans to meet with advisers before making a decision.

But skepticism remains about whether Morales, who finished a distant fourth in the 2014 Democrat primary for governor, has the political firepower to mount a serious campaign, especially against better-known and better-funded opponents, according to the Santa Fe New Mexican.

So far, three Democrats have entered the race, including former U.S. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland under Joe Biden, who reportedly raised nearly $3 million in just three months. Bernalillo County District Attorney and gun confiscation activist Sam Bregman and former Las Cruces Mayor Ken Miyagishima round out the field. That leaves Morales potentially splitting the vote with another southern New Mexico contender, while two well-known Albuquerque-based candidates may dominate the race in the state’s most populous region.

Morales himself acknowledged that a larger field would help his odds. In 2014, as a relatively unknown state senator, he received just 14% of the primary vote. Though he now holds the second-highest elected office in the state, his statewide political impact remains modest.

Moreover, Morales openly admitted he’s not sure if vocal encouragement will translate into campaign donations—an essential question for any serious contender. “Not necessarily,” he said when asked if money would be the determining factor. “I have children who are still in school.”

That personal angle hints at another option Morales is eyeing—one arguably more aligned with his background in education and his current lifestyle: becoming president of Western New Mexico University, his alma mater. However, that position comes with its own set of challenges.

The university, located in Morales’ hometown of Silver City, is in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons. Former President Joseph Shepard received a $1.9 million payout to resign, approved by a group of regents appointed by Gov. Lujan Grisham. Shepard was then offered a $200,000-per-year teaching position that required only two online business classes per semester.

In light of that controversy, four new regents (also appointed by Lujan Grisham) are overseeing the search for an interim president this summer, with a full-scale national search expected to stretch into 2026. Morales, who holds a doctorate in education and once coached high school baseball, says the school has deep personal meaning for him. “I grew up on that campus. It’s special to me,” he said.

Still, if Morales seeks the WNMU job, he’ll face fierce national competition. And while he’s positioned himself as a “down-to-earth” public servant, it remains to be seen if the university’s leadership, marred by allegations of mismanagement and self-dealing, can regain public trust, no matter who takes the reins.

In a Democrat Party already leaning toward nationally connected, far-left candidates, Morales would either have to moderate himself with cheesy slogans and costumes like Bregman or embrace the far-left radicalism of Lujan Grisham or Haaland. 

In the Republican gubernatorial primary, Rio Rancho Mayor Gregg Hull remains the lone candidate, while others have expressed interest.

Fourth candidate likely to join crowded Dem primary for governor Read More »

Tragic end to traffic stop: Bloomfield officer gunned down in line of duty

8 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Officer Timothy Ontiveros of the Bloomfield Police Department has died from injuries sustained during a violent encounter earlier in the week. The incident occurred during a traffic stop, where Ontiveros was shot in the neck and shoulder by 58-year-old Dennis Armenta. A fellow officer returned fire, fatally shooting Armenta.

Ontiveros was transported to the University of New Mexico Hospital following the shooting, where he underwent extensive treatment. Despite the efforts of medical staff and support from his fellow officers, Ontiveros succumbed to his injuries on Sunday.

“We’re really sad and disheartened on the current events that happened with Officer Ontiveros’s injuries,” said Bloomfield Police Chief Phillip Francisco. “A valiant effort was made to bring him back and recover from his injuries, but unfortunately, he lost that battle today.”

Chief Francisco remembered Ontiveros as a respected member of the department, though he had only been with Bloomfield PD since December 2024. “He was a very likeable person. He was very calm, very approachable… in that time, he got accommodations from citizens about his demeanor, how professional and approachable he was,” Francisco said.

Before joining Bloomfield PD, Ontiveros served with the Farmington Police Department and had volunteered as a firefighter with the Aztec Fire Department since 2017.

Officials confirmed Ontiveros will be transferred to the New Mexico Office of the Medical Investigator. Funeral details have not yet been finalized.

In a statement, the New Mexico Department of Public Safety expressed its condolences:

“It is with profound sorrow and heavy hearts that we bid farewell to Officer Timothy Ontiveros of the Bloomfield Police Department… Officer Ontiveros has fought with extraordinary courage, supported by tireless medical professionals at UNMH and steadfastly watched over by members of the New Mexico State Police.

Our deepest condolences go out to Officer Ontiveros’s family, friends, and loved ones. We also stand in solidarity with the Bloomfield Police Department and the entire Bloomfield community during this incredibly painful time. Officer Ontiveros served with dedication, integrity, and an unwavering commitment to protecting others. His bravery and sacrifice will never be forgotten.”

The Department reaffirmed its support for Ontiveros’s loved ones and the Bloomfield community, pledging to honor his service and memory.

According to a Facebook post from the Bloomfield Police Department, the suspect has a violent and bloody past and was released back onto the streets to cause havoc, including:

– **Date: 04-25-2023** – Aggravated Assault (Armed with an Axe), FPD Case #2023-22851

– **Date: 01-03-2021** – Resisting/Obstructing an Officer, FPD Case #2021-397

– **Date: 08-31-2013** – DWI, BPD Case #2013-7607

– **Date: 04-15-2025** – Threatening Hospital and Staff (SJRMC), FPD Case #2025-24198

– **Date: 08-22-2024** – Criminal Trespass, Concealing Identification, Obstructing an Officer, BPD #2024-8860

– **Date: 05-10-2012** – Criminal Trespass, Resisting Arrest, FPD Case #2021-24169

Tragic end to traffic stop: Bloomfield officer gunned down in line of duty Read More »

Keller ‘proud’ NM counties, cities listed as ‘sanctuaries’ for criminal aliens

38 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

As the Trump administration moves decisively to uphold federal immigration laws and protect American citizens, far-left Democrat leaders in New Mexico are proudly doubling down on their defiance. 

Chief among them is Albuquerque Mayor Tim Keller, who took to X to gloat about the city’s inclusion on the Department of Homeland Security’s official list of “sanctuary jurisdictions” — an indicator of non-compliance with federal immigration statutes.

“We expected this designation — Albuquerque’s immigrant-friendly policies reflect who we are,” Keller posted, calling it “a badge of courage” and vowing not to be “bullied” into enforcing federal law. Rather than expressing concern about the potential loss of federal funds or the safety implications of harboring criminal aliens, Keller made clear that his administration is committed to ideological resistance, no matter the cost to law-abiding residents.

The list, published on May 29, includes 23 New Mexico counties and two cities — Albuquerque and Santa Fe — that, according to DHS, refuse to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. This followed President Donald Trump’s April 28 executive order directing federal agencies to withhold funding from jurisdictions that shield illegal aliens from deportation.

In a statement that underscores the lawless posture of sanctuary cities, DHS wrote: “Each jurisdiction listed will receive formal notification of its non-compliance with Federal statutes. DHS demands that these jurisdictions immediately review and revise their policies to align with Federal immigration laws and renew their obligation to protect American citizens, not dangerous illegal aliens.”

But rather than taking this warning seriously, Democrats like Keller seem emboldened. His X post reflects the same out-of-touch political theater that has defined the progressive left’s stance on immigration, where shielding criminal aliens is viewed as virtuous, and federal law is something to scoff at.

Indeed, it’s not just defiance — it’s negligence. The dangerous policies pushed by Keller and fellow Democrats, including far-left Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, jeopardize public safety and disrespect the rule of law. The governor’s office, instead of committing to work with federal authorities, issued a deflective statement suggesting that counties might have been “mischaracterized.” No apology. No commitment to course-correct. Just more spin.

Meanwhile, radical organizations like the New Mexico Immigrant Law Center are already planning to double down in the next legislative session to further “protect” illegal immigrants, with the enthusiastic backing of progressive lawmakers and municipal leaders.

It’s no wonder New Mexico continues to struggle with crime, drug trafficking, and cartel violence. Sanctuary policies attract criminals, overwhelm resources, and endanger legal residents. President Trump’s administration is finally putting sanctuary jurisdictions on notice. Whether New Mexico Democrats will ever put citizens first remains to be seen — but judging by Keller’s gloating, their loyalty lies not with the American people, but with lawlessness.

Keller ‘proud’ NM counties, cities listed as ‘sanctuaries’ for criminal aliens Read More »

$3.7M in public money for abortions? NM’s Medicaid mystery exposed

16 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

Under the rule of Democrat Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, New Mexico’s Medicaid-funded abortion program continues to operate under a shroud of secrecy, according to a recent investigation by Abortion Free New Mexico, according to Life News. The pro-life watchdog group filed an Inspection of Public Records Act (IPRA) request on February 6, 2025, seeking a detailed breakdown of abortions paid for by New Mexico Medicaid between 2022 and 2024. The response they received from the New Mexico Health Care Authority (HCA) was described as “unprofessional, unclear and incomplete.”

The request, submitted by Tara Shaver, spokeswoman for Abortion Free New Mexico, asked for five specific data points: the total amount paid for abortions by Medicaid, the number and type (chemical or surgical) of procedures, the providers involved, gestational ages, and how many abortions were performed on undocumented immigrants. Instead of providing a full accounting, the HCA replied with a vague one-sentence response: “The New Mexico Health Care Authority, $2,980,083.31 was paid in PregTerm through 2022-2024. The New Mexico Health Care Authority does not have documents responsive to the remainder of this request.”

After continued inquiries, the HCA revised the total to over $3.7 million—$3,768,818.32—highlighting a troubling inconsistency in state reporting. A follow-up letter on April 16, 2025, revealed that 2024 had the highest amount of Medicaid funds used for abortion services. Yet key details—such as the number of procedures and provider information—remain concealed.

“This is unfortunately the norm in Democrat-run states like New Mexico,” said Shaver. “The New Mexico Health Care Authority denied that Medicaid even pays for abortions but gave two contradicting dollar amounts for PregTerm, which is understood to mean medical or surgical abortions. For a state that is so proud to champion abortion, why are they so unwilling to release actual abortion numbers that state taxpayers have funded?”

In a further twist, the HCA stated in email correspondence that it didn’t know of any government agency that could provide the requested data and suggested contacting private entities like Planned Parenthood instead. This raised additional concerns about accountability and transparency in the use of public funds.

Historically, previous administrations in New Mexico had fulfilled similar records requests in full, making the current administration’s evasiveness all the more concerning. Abortion Free New Mexico has since reached out to an open government organization for assistance and filed another IPRA request, this time targeting the medical codes used for abortion billing.

New Mexico is one of only 19 states that funds elective abortions through Medicaid using state-only funds, a policy rooted in a 1999 New Mexico Supreme Court ruling. The Court held that the state must fund all medically necessary abortions, citing the Equal Rights Amendment in the New Mexico Constitution.

As Shaver put it, “There is a definite trend in New Mexico to promote abortion but keep citizens in the dark about their shameful deeds.” She pointed to legislation passed in 2024, including SB 57, which now conceals the identities of abortion providers employed by public bodies. “The citizens of New Mexico deserve transparency from their government, and every innocent life should be protected under the law—born and preborn.”

$3.7M in public money for abortions? NM’s Medicaid mystery exposed Read More »

NM Democrat Party in total chaos: Gag orders, ghosting, and backstabbing

26 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

The New Mexico Democrat Party’s promises of unity have unraveled in spectacular fashion. Just a month after being elected party treasurer, Julie Rochman has resigned in a dramatic episode that lays bare the infighting and dysfunction roiling the state’s left-wing leadership, according to a report from the Santa Fe New Mexican.

Rochman, who won her post with 60% of the vote, said her troubles began the moment she extended a hand to newly elected Chair Sara Attleson. “She sort of really didn’t take it,” Rochman recounted. “I stepped in closer so no one could hear me, and I said, ‘You know, Sara, you have to talk to me. We’re going to be working together,’ and she turned on her heel and walked away.”

The April 26 encounter foreshadowed a toxic dynamic that would escalate over the next few weeks. According to Rochman, she was ignored, excluded from meetings, and ultimately pushed out by a leadership clique that campaigned on “unity” but delivered exclusion.

“I was being ignored by the chair and vice chair,” Rochman said. “I didn’t even know weekly staff meetings were taking place.” After enduring what she described as sleepless nights, she decided to resign. “I’m the problem, and I need to go,” she said, despite her lifelong ambition of being an elected Democrat.

The resignation exposes deep fractures in a party that claims to be preparing for high-stakes 2026 midterms, which includes New Mexico’s governorship vacant amid a disastrous tenure of far-left Democrat Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham. 

Instead of organizing and building coalitions, the party brass is more focused on silencing dissent and consolidating power. Rochman said she was handed a nondisclosure agreement containing an unprecedented nondisparagement clause — a “lifetime gag order,” she called it. She claimed, “That’s very Trumpian, and I will not be a party to that kind of thing,” she said — apparently unaware of the irony in using the comparison to criticize a tactic that came from her own party.

To add fuel to the fire, Rochman questioned the party’s supposed commitment to diversity. While the leadership includes an African American vice chair and a Navajo secretary, Rochman bluntly noted that the team lacks representation from New Mexico’s majority-Hispanic population — a glaring oversight for a party that lectures others on inclusion.

“I think it would be good for the party if [my replacement] happened to be Hispanic and spoke Spanish and came from a rural area,” she said.

Party spokesperson Daniel Garcia attempted to downplay the chaos, claiming that “team building” was simply a matter of taking time. But the damage is done. A public power struggle has broken out, and the party’s top officials are off at a conference while their ranks crumble back home.

Despite it all, Rochman says she’ll remain involved in Democrat politics. But her departure is an unmistakable warning sign: the New Mexico Democrat Party is not the unified, progressive machine it pretends to be. If this is how the party operates heading into an election year, Republicans may be wise to grab some popcorn. The Democrats are beating themselves.

NM Democrat Party in total chaos: Gag orders, ghosting, and backstabbing Read More »

Boxing matches and panic: MLG’s unhinged interview raises eyebrows

21 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

In a revealing and often contradictory interview with the left-wing Source New Mexico, Democrat Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham painted a dire picture of looming budget challenges—but instead of offering meaningful solutions or taking responsibility, she doubled down on political blame games, ideological deflection, and fearmongering.

At the center of the interview is Lujan Grisham’s claim that federal Medicaid reforms under the GOP-led House could cost New Mexico between $1 billion and $3 billion, depending on how the final budget takes shape. Rather than acknowledging the fiscal necessity behind these national efforts to rein in unsustainable entitlement spending, Lujan Grisham portrayed the cuts as apocalyptic.

“People will get hurt and they will die,” she claimed dramatically, without evidence.
“We could be on the hook for up to $300 million if the cuts, as we know them, were voted on today.”

Despite this rhetoric, Republicans in Congress are pursuing modest reductions aimed at long-overdue federal spending discipline, not the wholesale elimination of Medicaid or SNAP. Nowhere in the governor’s 6,000-word monologue does she address the ballooning cost of social programs or the abuse and inefficiencies that plague them.

Instead, she frames fiscal prudence as cruelty while boasting about her own administration’s reliance on reserves to possibly delay the impact:

“My pitch to the Legislature today… is we should try to sustain to the degree that we can for a year,” she said—effectively kicking the can down the road.

While claiming to focus on solutions, Lujan Grisham repeatedly resorted to hyper-partisan attacks. She described officials from the Department of Homeland Security as “terrifying,” accused the Trump administration of targeting New Mexicans, and said of former President Trump,

“There are not two sides… He is vile and abhorrent and doesn’t seem to understand or care that he creates real risk and people are harmed.”

Ironically, while slamming Trump’s leadership, Lujan Grisham admitted her own administration is unprepared to handle the consequences of any political confrontation.

“I don’t want New Mexicans to be targeted when I may not have all the things I need to protect you adequately,” she said, before adding, “I’m not going to invite them to drive over here and get into a boxing match.”

On public safety, the governor defended her decision to send National Guard personnel into Albuquerque, denying concerns that the deployment resembled martial law.

“A tank and people in uniforms like soldiers are not coming into your neighborhoods under this administration,” she insisted, brushing off fears even as crime surges statewide and law enforcement faces a staffing crisis.
“I’m running out of state police to cover all of that additional work,” she admitted, noting 100 current vacancies.

But rather than take ownership of the public safety crisis or offer concrete plans to fix it, Lujan Grisham shifted focus to grievances with past administrations and external factors, blaming Gov. Susana Martinez’s handling of behavioral health and the layout of Albuquerque’s interstate corridors.

When asked about the state’s struggling foster care system and dysfunction within the Children, Youth and Families Department (CYFD), she conceded,

“We have had some missteps. There’s no question about that,”
but quickly deflected, saying,
“Nobody wants to work there.”

Throughout the interview, Lujan Grisham sought to portray herself as a pragmatic, solutions-oriented leader, yet her remarks often came off as defensive and ideologically rigid. On the Biden administration’s retreat from federal DEI enforcement amid lawsuits, she said she was pleased that her administration had been “vanilla” in response.

“We don’t violate any of those rules right now. Thank you so much for reminding us that there’s no discrimination allowed,” she said sarcastically.

Despite repeated questions, Lujan Grisham offered few policy specifics about how she plans to navigate the challenges ahead, be it in healthcare, public safety, education, or immigration. She also revealed that she’s been unable to secure a meeting with President Biden over energy matters, saying,

“I couldn’t get in to see the president. I got in to see some very nice liaisons.”

She admitted the White House refused her request to collaborate on a felony warrant task force or fentanyl drug bust efforts, instead prioritizing mass deportations. Her response?

“No, thank you. That’s not a deal I’m willing to be engaged in.”

In short, Lujan Grisham’s interview amounted to a laundry list of grievances—against Trump, Republicans, the courts, Homeland Security, and even her own agencies—punctuated by dramatic language and sparse accountability. While Republicans work to right-size bloated federal programs, the governor is more concerned with ideological purity and political positioning than pragmatic governance.

As the state faces major budget challenges and an increasingly dangerous public safety environment, the governor’s remarks raise more questions than answers—and confirm that New Mexico’s leadership remains committed to the very big-government policies that created the problems in the first place.

Boxing matches and panic: MLG’s unhinged interview raises eyebrows Read More »

Lujan Grisham accused of political retaliation by one of her own

16 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

New Mexico Democrats are again at each other’s throats, this time in a public feud that lays bare the fractures within the party’s ranks. Freshman Rep. Sarah Silva (D-Las Cruces) ignited a firestorm on social media this week, accusing Democrat Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham of retaliating against her district after Silva championed a bill aimed at restricting free speech through lobbying at the Roundhouse.

Silva, in a fiery post, showcased a photo of what she called a “massive pile of swag” — minor gifts from lobbyists that have no real value, allegedly meant to sway her during the recent legislative session. Valuing the freebies at up to $2,000, Silva claimed, “It’s an example of the influence professional lobbyists and their employers have at the Roundhouse that you do not.”

The Democrat lawmaker says her pushback came in the form of House Bill 143, which would have required lobbyists to disclose their positions on legislation and promptly update that information if their stance changed. The bill passed both chambers despite bipartisan opposition. But it never made it into law.

“Unfortunately, the governor vetoed the bill,” Silva wrote, before twisting the knife: “Ironically, HB 143 would have given us information about who lobbied the governor to veto it. Without it, we have no way to know.”

Then came the real bombshell: Silva accused Lujan Grisham of retaliating by gutting funds Silva had secured for her district. Specifically, the governor used her line-item veto pen to kill $1 million earmarked for a public safety facility in Chaparral and another $100,000 for a study on incorporation and local governance, clearly targeted retaliatory measures due to HB 143 or some other reason, exposing massive cracks in the Democrat Party.

“Frankly, I’m pissed off,” Silva admitted. “It appears to me that the governor’s Chaparral vetoes were at least in part retaliation for my attempt to bring transparency to the work of her lobbying buddies.”

While Silva’s bill may have raised eyebrows — critics point out it imposed vague and burdensome mandates on both lobbyists and possibly lawmakers themselves — the governor’s veto doesn’t appear entirely above board either. Instead of offering technical amendments or working to clarify the bill’s flaws, Lujan Grisham simply tanked it and, if Silva’s claims are to be believed, punished a fellow Democrat in the process.

A spokesperson for Lujan Grisham brushed off the allegations as “obviously unfounded,” saying the governor supports more transparency, not less. “She would like even more transparency than HB 143 would have required,” claimed Lauren Dodd Thorp, suggesting the governor wants those same standards applied to herself and the Legislature.

That statement rings hollow to many watching the drama unfold. If the governor truly wanted more transparency, why veto the bill outright instead of working to improve it? And why yank funding for Chaparral — a move that just so happens to undercut one of the bill’s sponsors?

Also, after the 2025 Legislative Session, Lujan Grisham ferociously vetoed multiple benign bills, including one to increase optical care access in the state, a bill to create new license plates for lowriders and motorcyclists, as well as a bill to create the “state bread,” which was championed by a young girl in Las Cruces. All of these measures the governor rejected with a stroke of a pen because Democrats in the Legislature refused to deliver her agenda across the finish line, as she admitted in her toxic veto messages.

For conservatives and critics of Santa Fe’s one-party rule, the feud could be a moment of schadenfreude. Silva and Lujan Grisham are exposing the ugly side of their party’s internal politics — a mix of heavy-handed lobbying, bruised egos, and backroom power plays.

Ultimately, Silva may have inadvertently revealed more than any bill ever could about how some Democrats, at least the governor, treat dissent in their own ranks. And if the governor’s actions weren’t retaliatory, they sure look like it.

Vindictive MLG vetoes ‘State Bread,’ license plate bills to punish Dems

Lujan Grisham accused of political retaliation by one of her own Read More »

MLG, Dems livid after U.S. House passes Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’

23 Comments / New Mexico, News, Politics / By

In a triumphant moment for conservatives and the America First movement, President Donald J. Trump’s “One Big, Beautiful Bill” (BBB) passed the U.S. House by a razor-thin vote of 215–214, triggering an all-out meltdown from New Mexico Democrats and their allies on the far left. Contrarian Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) voted with Democrats on the bill on concerns of reckless spending, despite in 2023 voting to let Joe Biden raise the debt ceiling. Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) also joined Democrats and Massie in rejecting the bill that protects the Second Amendment and the country.

The historic legislation—a masterstroke of pro-growth policy, border security, and Second Amendment reinforcement—sent liberals into a frenzy. Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham and others unleashed emotional tirades over provisions prioritizing national sovereignty, economic opportunity, and constitutional freedoms. All of New Mexico’s U.S. House representatives rejected the monumental bill.

“The passage of this bill is a monumental win for American families, small businesses, gun owners, and patriots who believe in secure borders and free markets,” said Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA), who helped spearhead provisions to deregulate firearm suppressors. “This is a 2A victory and a direct hit on bloated bureaucracy.”

But while the rest of the country celebrates, New Mexico Democrats are in full panic mode.

Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham fumed, claiming the BBB “attacks Medicaid, jeopardizes food benefits for children, and undermines our progress on clean energy.” She failed to mention that the bill contains the largest middle-class tax cut in American history and reforms long-abused welfare programs to prioritize self-sufficiency and integrity. It does not, however, “attack” these programs.

Even more absurdly, Rep. Melanie Stansbury — red-faced and flustered during a press scrum — declared the bill’s funding of the border wall, Trump’s proposed “Golden Dome” missile defense shield, and national security enhancements as dangerous.

The hysterics weren’t limited to Capitol Hill. The New Mexico Democrat Party joined in, issuing a statement that the bill “will be deadly,” conveniently ignoring that their own party added $6 trillion in debt under Biden with nothing to show but inflation, energy dependence, and open borders.

Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez chimed in with her own apocalyptic claims, accusing Republicans of orchestrating “the largest transfer of wealth from the working class to the ultra-rich in American history.” Her screed overlooked the permanent expansion of the small business deduction, protections for family farms, and tax cuts for tipped workers like waitstaff and drivers — real benefits already lauded by groups like the Job Creators Network and Uber.

Rep. Gabe Vasquez also chimed in with the same tired and discredited talking points, much the same as Fernandez and Stansbury.

In contrast to the doomsday rhetoric from Democrats, industry leaders and advocacy groups celebrated the bill’s provisions:

The National Rifle Association praised the removal of suppressors from the National Firearms Act, calling it a “monumental victory for Second Amendment rights.”

Farm Bureau, Cattlemen’s Association, and National Pork Producers Council highlighted reforms that support family farms and protect food supply chains.

Border Czar Tom Homan applauded new funding to expand ICE operations, enhance wall construction, and combat child and drug trafficking.

The American Petroleum Institute cheered restored American energy dominance and the rollback of Biden-era methane fees.

Claims that BBB will devastate Medicaid and SNAP are baseless fear-mongering. The bill implements eligibility reviews, anti-fraud measures, and streamlined assistance reforms backed by most Americans. Even the alleged $500 billion in Medicare “cuts” are nothing more than trimming waste and fraud, not touching a dime of guaranteed benefits.

And yes — the bill includes funding for the Golden Dome, a groundbreaking anti-missile defense shield to protect against threats like China, Russia, and rogue nations.

At the end of the day, the BBB is about America First. It’s about freedom, prosperity, and security. That’s why the radical left is screaming. They’ve lost control — and the people are taking their country back.

Now, the bill heads to the U.S. Senate. Americans across the nation are urging their senators to finish the job. Let the Democrats wail — the future belongs to those who build it, not those who tear it down.

MLG, Dems livid after U.S. House passes Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Read More »

1 2 3 4 5 6 … 231
Scroll to Top