On Wednesday, the Albuquerque City Council came to a decision not to pass an anti-gun resolution that would have sent a proposal to the legislature requesting they strip the “firearms pre-emption clause” from Article II, Section 6 of the state constitution. The measure would ask for the revision to the article of the Constitution to be put on the ballot for voters’ approval.
The anti-gun measure, which would have potentially allowed cities like Albuquerque to pass whatever restrictions on guns they would like, would offer citizens no protection, and subject them to extreme restrictions on their constitutively protected right to own a firearm.
According to the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action, “Only five states — CT, HI, MA, NJ & NY, all bastions of gun control — have no preemption law or constitutional protection. Preemption ensures uniformity in state gun laws wherever you live, work or travel so that law-abiding citizens don’t unknowingly run afoul of confusing and conflicting local restrictions.”
The measure failed on a vote of 4 to 5, with Council Members Klarissa J. Peña, Brook Bassan, Cynthia Borrego, Trudy Jones, and Don Harris all opposing the measure. The resolution’s sponsors, Diane G. Gibson and Isaac Benton, as well as Pat Davis and Lan Sena, supported the failed measure.
Pingback: Why Do Michael Bloomberg's Mayors Against Illegal Guns Continue to Embrace Extremist Violence? - Guns Ammo and Preparedness
Pingback: Why Do Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns Continue to Embrace Extremist Violence? - Concealed Patriot
Pingback: Mayors Against Illegal Guns Still Embracing Extremist Violence – Gun News
Pingback: Mayors Against Illegal Guns Still Embracing Extremist Violence – Minnesota Gun Rights