Republican state Sen. David Gallegos of Eunice used New Mexico’s first lieutenant governor debate Thursday to draw sharp contrasts with Democrat State Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard on crime, government dependency, abortion, education, data centers, and the direction of state government.
The hourlong debate, hosted at the Albuquerque Journal and sponsored by the Journal, KOAT-TV, and News Radio KKOB, gave voters one of their first extended side-by-side looks at the two candidates who could soon preside over the state Senate and stand first in line to the governor’s office.
Gallegos, a longtime legislator from Eunice, repeatedly emphasized rural New Mexico, public safety, permanent tax relief, and reducing government barriers to economic growth. Garcia Richard, who became the Democrat nominee after Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver withdrew and the party’s State Central Committee selected a replacement, repeatedly returned to affordability, social programs, health care, and the agenda she shares with gubernatorial nominee Deb Haaland.
From the opening minutes, Gallegos framed the election as a choice over whether New Mexico needs a change in direction.
“I think this state’s been hurt for many years,” he said, adding that his focus would be “protecting New Mexicans first.”
Gallegos rejects temporary checks, pushes permanent relief
When asked how New Mexico should use an expected revenue windfall, Garcia Richard proposed raising the minimum wage, expanding the child tax credit, and increasing the working families tax credit.
Gallegos countered that state leaders should look beyond another round of one-time rebate checks.
He praised gubernatorial nominee Gregg Hull’s approach of pursuing changes that would provide more permanent relief rather than handing residents “$500 here, $500 there.”
Gallegos also called for examining regulations and other government-imposed costs that he said make it harder for New Mexicans and businesses to prosper, while describing the state’s enormous oil-and-gas revenues as “a blessing, not a curse.”
The candidates then produced one of the debate’s liveliest exchanges over Medicaid, SNAP, and other government assistance.
Gallegos described those programs as a “hand up, not a handout,” arguing that the long-term goal should be helping New Mexicans become self-sufficient rather than perpetually dependent on Washington.
Garcia Richard responded that she had relied on Medicaid and WIC after having her first child.
“I now stand before you running for the second-highest office in our state,” she said.
Gallegos quickly turned her own example back toward his argument.
“You proved my theory,” he replied, saying her story demonstrated that assistance can help someone through a difficult period before that person moves forward independently.
Public safety becomes central dividing line
Gallegos was equally direct when an audience member asked what single issue he would address immediately.
“Public safety,” he answered.
He recounted staying at an Albuquerque hotel where an employee warned him to move his truck because it could be stolen. Gallegos argued that New Mexico needs to give police more funding, backing, and respect, and said communities such as Rio Rancho show a different approach to law enforcement.
“Albuquerque is known for ‘Breaking Bad,’ and that’s not good for our state,” he said.
Earlier, Gallegos criticized what he described as “catch-and-release,” called for keeping dangerous repeat offenders incarcerated, and advocated cooperation with federal immigration authorities when dealing with criminal offenders.
Garcia Richard agreed that New Mexicans do not feel safe but drew a sharp line on immigration enforcement, saying local police should concentrate on violent criminals and illegal drugs rather than cooperating with ICE in schools, hospitals, and other public spaces. She accused federal immigration enforcement of “terrorizing” communities in those settings.
KOAT likewise identified public safety as one of the debate’s major fault lines. KOAT
Taxpayer-funded abortion facilities draw stark split
The candidates were perhaps furthest apart on abortion.
Asked whether taxpayer dollars should continue funding reproductive-health facilities that perform abortions, Garcia Richard said “Absolutely.”
Gallegos responded just as emphatically.
“I’d absolutely not,” he said.
Gallegos argued that taxpayers should not be financing facilities specifically designed around abortion services and said medically necessary procedures can be handled by doctors and hospitals.
“We don’t need to be building facilities statewide to fund an industry,” he said.
Garcia Richard later challenged Gallegos directly over his opposition to abortion, asking whether he could still govern under New Mexico’s existing laws.
Gallegos said he would be bound by state statute and acknowledged that a lieutenant governor cannot simply rewrite abortion law. He said any change would need to pass the Legislature, while advocating parental notification or consent involving minors.
Gallegos confronts Garcia Richard on education record
Education produced another pointed exchange.
Garcia Richard, a former teacher, advocated placing literacy coaches in classrooms and defended New Mexico’s taxpayer-funded Opportunity Scholarship program.
Gallegos responded by reminding viewers that Garcia Richard previously voted against legislation aimed at addressing third-grade reading proficiency through retention of some struggling students.
Garcia Richard defended herself by arguing that the much-discussed “Mississippi Miracle” in education also included literacy coaches and additional assistance for struggling students.
Gallegos’ response was brief:
“Still voted no.”
He also explained his opposition to the original free-college proposal, saying he wanted publicly financed higher education tied to graduates remaining in New Mexico for a period afterward.
Data centers: Gallegos says harness them instead of simply stopping them
The candidates also offered sharply different approaches to the exploding data-center industry.
Garcia Richard reiterated Haaland’s promise for a day-one moratorium on new large-scale projects until state officials establish safeguards governing water and electricity, but avoided the fact that her campaign, along with others, have taken hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations from big data centers and their executives.
Gallegos argued that New Mexico should capture the jobs and investment while requiring projects to address their own resource needs.
He suggested using small modular nuclear reactors for electricity and desalinating New Mexico’s plentiful brackish water rather than drawing from existing freshwater supplies.
“I think it’s coming,” Gallegos said of the industry. “If it’s not going to be done, it’ll be done somewhere else.”
‘There’s got to be a compromise’ on gubernatorial debate
One of Gallegos’ sharpest attacks was directed not at Garcia Richard, but at her running mate.
Asked whether Haaland and Hull should debate, Gallegos said New Mexicans deserve to see the gubernatorial candidates confront one another directly.
“There’s got to be a compromise because the people of New Mexico deserve this,” he said, adding that debates reveal a candidate’s “backbone,” knowledge, and vision.
Garcia Richard pushed back, insisting that “no one is running or hiding” and defending Haaland’s experience and statewide campaigning.
The gubernatorial campaigns still have not agreed on a debate date, despite invitations from New Mexico media organizations. The Journal reported that Hull accepted its original invitation while Haaland had not, though the campaigns have since exchanged competing proposed dates.
Gallegos closed the lieutenant governor debate by returning to the constituency he said is too often overlooked in Santa Fe.
“I’m rural New Mexico,” he said. “I want to stand up for the rural people in this state because they don’t feel they have a voice.”
Garcia Richard closed by promoting the Haaland-Garcia Richard ticket’s plans on doctors, housing, affordability, and government programs.
The debate ultimately put two distinctly different governing philosophies on the same stage — something New Mexicans are still waiting to see from the candidates at the top of the ticket.